Replies (136)

Benking's avatar
Benking 3 months ago
Yes, and buy Bitcoin🤝🏼
No. Your life is too important. We need you for the future to build up. If you sue, you believe in this scammy pseudo-legal system. In the end you can't win against this rotten system. I prefer to fight only if I'm convinced I can win quickly without depending on third parties. And, I'm not a coward. It's just a risk evaluation. If you go for it, fuck'em;!
But also she definitely didn’t write that book 😅 let alone read it herself. This is probably news to her as well.
Someone gave him 300 Bitcoin, of which I'm sure the tyrant oligarchs will send their Sheriff of Nottingham (IRS/local Police) to demand that he hand over more than half it. Regardless, he's got a nice stack.
Leo's avatar
Leo 3 months ago
Of course not, fuck these people
Maybe, if you just want to be a pain in her ass. In order to win this type of lawsuit, you need to prove damages. Like many other people, I didn’t learn your story until after you were incarcerated. I would bet that your fan base actually increased because of the #freeross movement. The world is your oyster right now. Why take a negative path when there’s so much good you can do?
dustygrooves's avatar
dustygrooves 3 months ago
That’s plenty of F-U money to not get involved in legal stuff, no?
Fear and Wisdom alike can compel a person to move out of the way of the speeding gravel truck. Which compels the person in any such event? How can we know which, Fear or Wisdom or both, is at play? I step out of the way of the speeding gravel truck because to do otherwise would rugpull my ability to do good karmic work in this incarnation, not because I am afraid of what comes next.
Default avatar
Vincent 3 months ago
It’s about narrative control and they trying to ruin your reputation, they lie, lie, lie, lie.
The hypocrisy of these people who have no problem slandering others, but then they try to muzzle anyone who speaks ill of them (lookin at you too Hillary) At least imposing some costs might deter future bs
No. To be litigious is very statist and fiat. It's playing their games, therefore legitimizing their tyrannical systems. Fuck their systems. A cease and desist should suffice, but even that, I would not bother with. View quoted note →
Clear lies. You absolutely have a case. We all hate lawfare, but they're going to keep pulling this shit until the costs outweigh the benefits. image
Mashi mashi's avatar
Mashi mashi 3 months ago
#freesamourai #tornadocash #romansterlingov
She’s such a slimy cunt! I don’t like feeding the evil legal system whatsoever. But if it means bankrupting that lizard cunt, I’d say yes.
Life is short and you’ve spent a large portion of your adult life behind bars. Will going back to fiat courts actually make you feel better? Does her opinion of you matter to you? I bet she didn’t even write the book…
let that shit slide like the grams smh. you have a life to live.
I didn't say they were opposite ends of a spectrum, so you're not correcting anything with that statement, but yes, I agree. Love and fear are opposites. Wisdom is a refined form of love.
R's avatar
R 3 months ago
You’re free now Ross, use your freedom however you want. 🚁😎
CypherPvnK's avatar
CypherPvnK 3 months ago
Kamala is just a fraud. What to expect from this kind of this individual?
Default avatar
Roboto 3 months ago
Wouldn't waste your time
Default avatar
ihsotas 3 months ago
Do it. People who run their mouths this irresponsibly should face some penalties.
Default avatar
ihsotas 3 months ago
Libel is not free speech. This is especially true when it is a very famous person using their platform to damage another person.
Default avatar
ihsotas 3 months ago
He was not a dealer. He was charged for running the marketplace that was used to deal drugs.
DiGTALDementia's avatar
DiGTALDementia 3 months ago
So does that mean cartel drug lords aren't drug dealers just because they only employ the people who deal them? Creating a marketplace which then allows people to sell whatever they want inherently ties you to every sale. Without your marketplace that sale wouldn't have occurred. It's all semantics and Ross knows he doesn't have a case otherwise he'd have just done it instead of posting for clout and attention.
You got a second chance at life when you thought you might never be a free man. Do you really want to wrap yourself into the shitstorm of national politics and the psychopaths involved in that? Go enjoy life. If you choose this other path then you have nobody to blame but yourself for where you end up
Default avatar
ihsotas 3 months ago
Drug lords are deeply involved in the creation and transportation of the drugs. This is not an apples to apples comparison you are making.
Hell yeah. Should also talk about it on podcasts and other shows and spread the message of Bitcoin. You have an audience!
DiGTALDementia's avatar
DiGTALDementia 3 months ago
You can pretend like creating/controlling the entire platform and profiting from drug sales you are aware of doesn’t make you complicit, but the fact is it does. While not exactly the same there are parallels between running a drug empire and running drug empire website. If he had a case a suit would be filed.
ChadXMR's avatar
ChadXMR 3 months ago
I heard she's dumb as a rock 🤔
Go on Joe Rogan!! And let Rogan destroy her. But wait...she just wants to sell her book now. One last cash grab. Don´t fall for it.
rapadu's avatar
rapadu 3 months ago
‘Was auch immer geschieht: Nie dürft ihr so tief sinken, von dem Kakao, durch den man euch zieht, auch noch zu trinken! ‘ (Erich Kästner)
EDJ's avatar
EDJ 3 months ago
There are countless better ways to spend your time.
Dexter's avatar
Dexter 3 months ago
Don’t. I’m heaps glad you’re free and I like what you did with Silk Road. But the reality is that it was pretty shady and while you weren’t technically a dealer you definately enabled dealers so it’s not that far off the mark. And to be clear I’m pro Silk Road and freedom and this is in no way a criticism of you or what you did. I thought it was awesome. Like some other folks said, go on Rogan, tell your story. Spread the word of Satoshi.
Can she really hurt you? What's the ROI on that trial? Is it worth it?
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 3 months ago
Let’s prosecute the people that pave and operate the toll roads that drug dealers knowingly travel upon too, right?
DiGTALDementia's avatar
DiGTALDementia 3 months ago
Lmfao, you misread what I said. I said Ross knew drug sales were occurring on the marketplace he built and was profiting from those. What a wonderfully bad analogy. Ross wasn’t some dude paving a road or operating a toll booth, he built and owned the empire that road was in.
Absolutely. That's defamatory slander at its finest, and it's being used for her own (now nonexistent) political career.
I think no one else can tell you what to do. Deep down you know the answer. If I am to give a penny to your question, I can only ask a question back - how much time are you willing to invest in this lawsuit esp you just got out? You just said it yourself on your bio: "freedom is sweet" - would you be willing to spend the next five years going to court and thinking about the lawsuit or would you rather spend those time making up the time lost? Either way, you are right on what you decide! 👌
xenonsky's avatar
xenonsky 3 months ago
no of course not. just be happy with the fame and freedom
DiGTALDementia's avatar
DiGTALDementia 3 months ago
This is a hilarious take. Ross isn’t the toll booth operator or the paver in your scenario, he owns the empire they’re working in. He knew exactly what was taking place on his marketplace and he profited greatly from it.
Don't use the state to fight the state. You're an inspiration to a movement that is building a better world. You’ve been a light in the darkness for many of us. That’s why we follow you—not because you play their game, but because you remind us that there’s another way to live in the darkness of our times. Let’s stay lighthouses in the storm, guiding others, and keep building the better world we actually want—together, not through them.
DiGTALDementia's avatar
DiGTALDementia 3 months ago
I mean I just joined nostr, but if I wanted a quick following I could parrot right wing conservative conspiracy bullshit for a couple of days and have just as many followers as you. Cult gonna cult.
You did your time, we taxpayers paid for it all. How about the rest of your life try not to sue or be sued and stay out of court? That is a goal of mine. Been sued once but my part still intact.
100% Ross, this is crazy levels of disrespect and you shouldn't have to tolerate it. Kamala is just mad that she lost and see Trump pardoning you as a way to hurt Trump and those he's helped release from prison. You are an amazing pioneer and deserve respect for what you've innovated. Your story inspired me to seek pure freedom and to understand the realities of substance control and harm reduction. That the market you've helped build was a free and truly open one too. Much love man and if there's a way I can donate some sats for the legal fees please share me a Bitcoin address. I doubt you'd read my comment. But I'm grateful your free and I thank you for your contributions to helping build a free and open society.
don’t waste time. Justice doesn’t work my honor and reputation were destroyed by fake news and false accusations spread by politicians, media and the Govt of my country. the TRUTH doesn’t matter
Very sad how many, so called, Bitcoiners answered with yes. For me, you aint Bitcoiners anymore! Fuck the gov! Free speech!
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 3 months ago
Poor phrasing from me. I meant to describe a hypothetical toll booth corporation or entity that profits directly from a known >0 criminals on their tolled roads. Here’s a thought experiment for your virtues: What percent of criminals of any sort, petty crime to violent offenders, should be permitted to use their toll roads? For example, if criminals are less than 0.2% of all drivers, is that permissible? Is it the burden of that entity to KYC everyone and block any offenders? Should local govts subsidize the toll corps law enforcement budgets? If you disagree that that petty crime should not be included, where do you draw the line for crime severity? Why is your moral authority superior? You probably get my point by now.
DiGTALDementia's avatar
DiGTALDementia 2 months ago
Not poor phrasing , it’s just a poor analogy, period. Citizens are forced to use a toll road to live their lives, no one was forced to use the Silk Road, they chose to because it was “anonymous” and they could use it for purposes they couldn’t use eBay for. Your thought experiment is also just as irrelevant. So no real point in responding, but the DOT is not the police, they’re also not a corporation, roads are paid for by the tax payers using those roads and traveling them is a permissible for all. If you get pulled over on the road and are found to have illegal substances or have done a crime, then you will be tried for that crime. Not all of us can be so lucky or possibly bribe corrupt politicians to be pardoned for our crimes. Yet another example of the two tiered justice system.
BroJack's avatar
BroJack 2 months ago
Brother Ross.. if you don’t Sue.. they remain emboldened with yet more fabricated lies..