Replies (99)

drea's avatar
drea 9 months ago
that's just the beginning of it.
gladstein's avatar gladstein
Totally predictable Left-wing groups are now getting debanked under Trump and need Bitcoin image
View quoted note →
.'s avatar
. 9 months ago
Fuck leftist. They are treated with kid gloves. They use our values against us. The right needs to fight back. Are we really pretending lime this?
Nn's avatar
Nn 9 months ago
Hey, Bitcoin is for everyone
A criminal investigation is not “debanking” for political reasons. As we learned in the recent past, criminal investigations and law fare can be political. No?
You realize the root word for defraud is fraud, right? That word is in the image. That aside, if you want to pour your own money into Habitat for Humanity, go right ahead, but don't force me to do that with my money via taxes.
Majority of people have no clue and/or don't actually believe in the freedom shit they spout when the other side is in power and they are the ones getting shitted on. Soon as tables flip, many of them throw all the "principled" stances they had before out the window. They just want to be the side in power and doing the shitting on.
Default avatar
losefriends 9 months ago
They don't need Bitcoin. Bitcoin is crashing. Don't be stuck holding the bag. Devil takes the hindmost.
Habitat for humanity is a great organization that builds homes for low income folk. However why are they receiving funds from the EPA? Presumably this is under the microscope.
John Smith's avatar
John Smith 9 months ago
left wing fools realizing that creating tools for persecuting their opponents ends up with them at the end of the gun barrel as well
One of these days Greenpeace may need Bitcoin. Bitcoin doesn't hold grudges; its utility is there for its enemies too
gladstein's avatar gladstein
Totally predictable Left-wing groups are now getting debanked under Trump and need Bitcoin image
View quoted note →
Bitcoin Ranger's avatar
Bitcoin Ranger 9 months ago
When you build centralized power structures, eventually the other side wins the election.
When the Left is in power, they shut down and criminalize the Right. When the Right is in power, they shut down and criminalize the Left. This should not be… and is a terrible precedent.
Couldn't agree more. The Right are equally bad and the same LARPers as the left. They want to clamp down on free speech using "Terrorism" and "National Security" as threats while the Left wants it cause it's "Hurtful" to others.
wildcatfish's avatar
wildcatfish 9 months ago
"Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome." -Carlie Munger on Fiat
That’s a generalization and not specific to this instance or any of the other corruption DOGE has found. There are actual criminals out there. We can’t just look the other way because people make it political. Precedent went out the window during the Biden administration. Bringing accountability and justice to shadowy NGOs is exactly the precedent we want.
You’re implying that Trump is going after leftist groups just because they are leftist and not because they are corrupt or criminal. We weren’t born yesterday, everyone knows exactly what you were implying. I don’t care what they use as long as it’s not my taxes. Shady NGOs are welcome to request bitcoin donations, but something tells me it won’t go as far as that sweet taxpayer money they were getting
Default avatar
Rand 9 months ago
@ spotOn friend t *Y*
Default avatar
Rand 9 months ago
sure maybe fiat system IZ out of balance & needz more youngrz(ezerz 2 manage)2 supplement but f'n olde blood @ the sake of new IZ beyond strategic/critical thot imho*/*
Nuh's avatar
Nuh 9 months ago
Bitcoin is not ready to serve everyones needs with no kyc, and Bitcoiners who care about this are bullied away. Please let's get Drivechains over with, or OP_CAT or something. Or fuck it let's monetize Signet. View quoted note →
Default avatar
Frank01945 9 months ago
Decentralized, Digital Economies & Democracies Our democracies and economies are being shattered by oligarchs who claim that democracy and freedom for all cannot work and we should trust only them. While good people struggle to reassemble their democracies, we need to design and start to implement replacements for our deeply flawed systems that allow oligarchs to buy politicians and judges. Bitcoin, distributed, decentralized and secure, is an important economic step for humanity. NOSTR, also decentralized and integrated with Bitcoin’s Lightning Network, is a young, decentralized social network. Simple Proof offers truthful timestamped verification of data. Fedimint shows the potential of distributed networks of value, secured by the bitcoin network. The Digital Democracy of Taiwan (TDD) shows that a pro-social, moderated democracy can garner widespread public participation and confidence. And the Tibetan government in exile is a model for a global system of support for the people of Tibet, in spite of the Chinese Communist Party. From these examples, we can envision parallel systems of economic and political freedom and democracy, built upon the foundations of these and other technologies. AI will help. Communities can be of any number, size and geographical location. From two friends, to many relatives, to neighborhoods, towns, cities, counties, craft and trade unions, universities, states, nations, beliefs, political views, and the world. Fedimint can accommodate them all. Public / Private keys assure identity, while Zero Proof Knowledge protects identity. Communities draw up their own charters / constitutions and appoint moderators (like Reddit) to keep discourse within community standards, while trusted members manage keys. All through encrypted communication (like Fedi and Nostr?). Anti-social media by countries, bots, and actors trying to monetize discord and hatred, are countered by spotlights and humor (like TDD). Communities can choose to operate by direct voting or through representatives, with all information available to all. TDD’s system is optimized for consensus and mutual aid. TDD takes difficult issues, like abortion, and finds the parts that “both sides” agree with, like preventing unwanted pregnancies, leaving a remainder of disagreement and minimizing the dissonance. In some ways, we are all alienated by current systems and rulers. We are all communities in exile from what is possible for humanity. There are people in the US calling for a “shadow cabinet”. Imagine a “shadow government” for all institutions, daring to invent and consider better ways to do things, with whistle blowers honored instead of demonized. As Jeff Booth notes, productivity is growing so quickly that there will be more than enough for everybody. We add, there will only be enough if oligarchs don’t get to seize, hoard, squander it. We seek others, particularly those with the technical knowledge to see what is possible and how to start.
Default avatar
Rand 9 months ago
A C C E L E R A T E*****OE*****
WTF? Habitat is not a partisan organization. It’s fucking as American as it gets in the non-profit world. They don’t give away housing- they build affordable homes, find qualified people on the cusp and help them attain financing to get a mortgage. They have a huge success rate. H4H LA (who I’ve worked with personally) runs a lean and mean machine with tons of community volunteers and a core group of badass builders. View quoted note →
Bitcoiners after the truckets debacle still don't understand that there is a difference between fungible Monero and non-fungible Bitcoin. It'll beva hard lesson for many.
gladstein's avatar gladstein
Totally predictable Left-wing groups are now getting debanked under Trump and need Bitcoin image
View quoted note →
InigoBTC's avatar
InigoBTC 9 months ago
Eroding core American principles such as innocent until proven guilty is a sure way to erode trust in the American experiment. Freezing bank accounts should be a penalty used if and when a party is proven to have violated laws at the time the offenses occurred.
I think what he’s saying is that the pendulum swings both ways- and Bitcoin is neutral to politics therefore resilient to overstepping in both directions. I’m with you that corrupt groups should not be funded by taxpayer dollars and am largely supportive of what’s happening- but this is the type of blind partisan action that could blow back in 4 years.
If they’ve committed a crime prosecute them. Otherwise, go fuck yourself with this debanking shit. You sound like a Lizzy Warren minion. Shame on you.
We can’t be scared of doing the right thing because the other side may retaliate later. We are not talking about grandma’s bakery getting debanked because she doesn’t agree with Trump.
Default avatar
Be The Change 9 months ago
I think @less , you need to provide some examples that substantiates your claim here. Ideally examples that are equally burdensome if your point is to equate the culpability of both parties. I don’t see that they equate at all.
Default avatar
Be The Change 9 months ago
Keep in mind that there are several policy stances that the left now oppose which they supported just a couple administrations ago. …such as gay marriage 🤷‍♂️
"Taxpayer money" is the people being defrauded by the United States Government. Start there
DeusVult's avatar
DeusVult 9 months ago
Completely agree. What's amazing is that in spite of this, people still will excuse such action merely because *generally* bitcoiners get more flak from the left, so they assume the right has their best interests at heart. The truth is neither do, and any rightwing/leftwing support you get is because it's politically expedient in that moment.
Yes, there is, and you’re the one that alluded to that by saying things can blow back in 4 years, meaning the other political party can win the election, i.e the other side.
Løbsterhogan's avatar
Løbsterhogan 9 months ago
If someone stole a large sum of money from you, wouldn't you want their bank account to be frozen during the course of the investigation and trial so that you actually had some hope of being reimbursed?
InigoBTC's avatar
InigoBTC 9 months ago
I completely understand and respect your position. If, say, you believed that stole your private property, my funds should be frozen until the matter resolved. My challenge is that this is a slippery slope to abuse. What if I did not actually steal from you, months without access to my money means I will lose my house and my family will starve. Worse yet, I’m concerned for the possibility of abuse. Perhaps you just don’t like the way I write on Nostr, and you make an accusation that results in my financial ruin? What recourse would I have apart from waiting months for the legal system to decide I was innocent?
The stuff I can buy with money isn't magically protected if it gets stolen I can see how it would be useful to solve that problem for the money itself, but solving it seems to create more problems - then again, so does money itself
Default avatar
Dow 9 months ago
Hmm, as much as the media loathes Trump, why hasn’t a single other outlet covered this? Who is the new republic lmao Of course as a principle that’s messed up, but something’s weird about the fact nobody else has called it out when they hate the guy so much.
Default avatar
Dow 9 months ago
Disregard I’m finally finding more sources for it
Default avatar
Dow 9 months ago
Disregard my other comment I’m finding more sources for it now. Weird I had to specifically search frozen funds instead of just habitat for humanity news articles.
Default avatar
Sun of the Moon 9 months ago
False Equivalency. Time to catch up. One group was debanked for actual money laundering via NGOs while the other was debanked for excersising their first amendment rights. Its ironic that our great hero @jack would repost this given his track record to stifle free speech on twitter.
Jacob Drafts's avatar
Jacob Drafts 9 months ago
Indentured servitude. The stolen money is gone? The thief better get to work. Not got to prison. Working to pay back the principle amount stolen plus interest. A lot of interest. On a chain gang at gun point if they refuse to work for garnished wages.
Jacob Drafts's avatar
Jacob Drafts 9 months ago
Of course if they do take it that far they’d also be on the hook to pay for the guards.
I agree with the equivalency part. However we can’t assume @jack ‘s motivations. Maybe he likes people to use bitcoin, regardless of what the incentive for it is? We just don’t know.
Syd 💎's avatar
Syd 💎 9 months ago
But like how about we don’t use banking as a weapon. Let them get convicted of money laundering otherwise it’s just politicians getting to decide who to debank. So insane people defend this shit
Default avatar
Dow 9 months ago
If you didn’t like the idea of democrats doing it to their opponents, you shouldn’t enjoy the idea of Trump doing so either. View quoted note →
Peace K 🪙's avatar
Peace K 🪙 9 months ago
People with power would always use it to their advantage. Putting "your" person in office is a false solution. The solution is to take away power from government.
Default avatar
SpacemanSpiff 9 months ago
Live by the sword... I say this as someone who works for a very politically exposed govt and defense contractor. Every paycheck is part grift. If you rely on govt guns to collect, you need to be ready to be cut off at any moment at best, or have them pointed at you at worst.
Default avatar
SpacemanSpiff 9 months ago
You might have it backwards. Maybe none of this is worth using the govt's monopoly on force to collect for. Maybe both sides shooting down the others grift is exactly what we should not hate to see.
Løbsterhogan's avatar
Løbsterhogan 9 months ago
This does make sense, yes. I have no real objection to your position. I am open to any kind of effective means of restitution.
Actions have consequences. Corruption needs to be rooted out; otherwise, we end up with a rotten system like we currently have. I don’t want my tax dollars going to NGOs or other groups that have no business in getting that money.
Phil 's avatar
Phil 9 months ago
At least we don’t have to argue „bitcoin has no use case!“ anymore. I was predicting this to friends and they said „well, don’t be so dystopian.“