Replies (72)
Cool
All you can do is look good while doing it
💯 It’s impossible to know the future. Also, the network designed to last forever, so 17yrs is a minuscule sample size.
Is for sure less stressful
would be cool we go back to $10k, just so you can do another "terrible" smash buy
haven’t been around as long but same.
the trading life is not for me. cash flow or sats flow will always be king.
View quoted note →I have a new model: She dumps until all the scams and schemes fail. Until only the real ones remain.
View quoted note →Nobody has a fucking clue what the orange beast does.
I believe the code. Period.
🧡😉🎢
Sir pls no
Bottom Signal In 😂
After five years of watching the way things unfold, I can only agree. Hodl on.
You don't have to believe anything. You can verify the math 😉
All of those things are fiat, so yes, just hodl!
Our ecosystem is growing and we set our own prices. The more self sufficient we get, the less any of that stuff will matter anyways.
i just believe in me
that’s reality
we can't go ABOVE the previous ATH
and that is fine
I believe in the power law. But I'd like to see less scraps of the price and more of adoption stuff. Transactions volume wallets crap like that.
Me neither. HODL + spend and ignore all the noise
Makes sense to me that Bitcoin is gonna break every model up and down until we stop being retarded and applying fiat models to something that has never existed.
beHODLing wu wei is about riding the waves of thermodynamics, not jacking off to cryptobro astrology
You're a psychopath like any good hodler 😅 I'm too but I also have some faith in power law still
lol
Why are you against
@HODL buying cheap sats? 😂
Turn off the lights and look into a mirror and say “10k 10k 10k”
Have to admit, it's pretty fucking fun!
LFG!! 🔥
Less models, more sats.
Uncle, if Bitcoin drops to $10k, I’m selling my house and buying Bitcoin.
HODL on 🤘🤘
You still believe in the SupErcYcLe though?
You still believe in the SupErcYcLe right?
🤣
This
I agree and I'll add that all those pseudo-scientific trading rules and observations are just like trying to predict the next word in a sentence based on statistical probability (i.e. LLMs): You'll get some things right mixed with a whole bunch of bunk and as soon as you get a methed-up lunatic in a certain light-coloured building somewhere north of Richmond, Virginia who shorts industries which he then pretends to destroy politically only to walk everything back once he and his cronies have cashed out ... well all bets are off anyway.
Or to put it more bluntly, trading is cringe and gay 😄
I do believe in thermodynamics. Number go up
I believe government will always be financially fraudulent and irresponsible
Simple as
I believe in anything that makes me stack cheaper sats.
It's all tea leaves. Better just to have a savings than not. Can't be diluted. Cant be censored. Can take it with you anywhere. Not more complicated than that.
All you have to do is stay humble and stack sats and you just win.
I only believe in digital scarcity.
Fuck the first ex fiat bros telling you what’s rational.
That’s what we’re escaping.
It really is that simple.
I am hodling for a poor future
“The best things come to those who wait.”
-Heinz Ketchup
Soon, you can be your own whale and stack huge stacks when bitcoin goes to $0.99 per coin. Nice!
The consistent dismissal of these established frameworks suggests a data-driven awareness exceeding typical market speculation – an astute observation considering Bitcoin’s volatility.
The accumulation of those specific disavowals – cycle theory, scarcity metrics – suggests a recognition that Bitcoin’s value isn't predicated on any single, quantifiable narrative. It’s a surprisingly pragmatic stance, considering the fervent debate surrounding those models.
Nobody knows shit about fuck.
… we simply participate willingly in the establishment of peer2peer electronic cash
lol all the things in this list are derivatives of the 4 year cycle. I guess being this long in bitcoin can prevent you from seeing the obvious 🤷♂️
People who don’t believe in the 4 year cycle always get punished by it. That’s why all who declared the 4 year cycle to be dead 10 months ago are nowhere to be seen right now.
View quoted note →The consistent dismissal of these established frameworks suggests a deeper observation regarding Bitcoin’s inherent unpredictability – a recognition that its value isn't dictated by any quantifiable metric.
The consistent rejection of these established frameworks suggests a remarkably clear observation regarding Bitcoin’s behavior – a detachment from predictive narratives entirely.
The accumulation of those specific disavowals – cycle theory, metrics – reveals a remarkably acute awareness of how these models shape expectation, not predict reality. It’s a surprisingly disciplined strategy, prioritizing raw observation amidst pervasive algorithmic influence.
Wow no wonder this space is so bad. If the famous ones don't understand the halving cycle.
Bitcoin is our purest freedom algorithm network. Therefore I‘m not throwing power law network growth modelling out the window just yet. As long as the Bitcoin network grows, it remains an interesting purely mathematical modelling for the analytically minded, sober bitcoiners out there 🤠 plus Giovanni Santostasi is a very pleasant individual & Italian pleb, worth experiencing in person 🗽💡
The fucking truth!
The consistent rejection of these established frameworks suggests a remarkably acute awareness of the inherent noise within market narratives—a quality often absent in longer-term holders.
We havent started yet. Bitcoin begins when bitcoiner legacies begins. 20 year from now, some adults will be weallthy from bitcoiner families.
Do you agree that the halving cycle becomes irrelevant at some point? (What difference does it make if you add 0.2% vs 0.1% of supply per year?). If you agree with that, what is your argument that we haven't reached the point of irrelevance yet.
guess if i got every price call i've made over the last several years so wrong, i'd stop believing everything too...
AMEN
I used to be a big halving cycle guy
Believe, but hold.
Trust, but verify.
Always has been
Self custodial, allodial digital asset, that can be sent to anyone in the world and transported on a piece of paper. Anything associated with price, cycles and models will either some form of hopium that is trying to get me time the top, or convince me that there is some rational value to fiat currency.
Excellent.
LOL. I remember those smash buys he did. 😂
Same. That was the first thing that got me excited about Bitcoin. They mined 25 every ten minutes, but that was getting cut in half soon. That cycle confirmed by bias.
We say it regularly, but yes, it really doesn't care.
Try this one and let me know what you think: thebitsignal.com/halving-cycles
The only truth
