The other day on Twitter/X, I paid out a 2,100,000 sat or $1,700 USD Lightning bounty. Over the past couple years, I’ve offered an occasional challenge on Twitter/X. When people tell me Lightning doesn’t work, I often ask them in random comments for their Lightning details so I can pay them in the next 5-10 minutes on the spot, permissionlessly, wherever they are, with this payment method that supposedly doesn’t work. Every single time, they can’t do it. Because they haven’t even tried it. They’re just talking. I’ve done this a ton of times and nobody ever takes the sizable sat offerings. In Dan Held’s anti-Nostr thread, Mark Jeffrey was critical of Lightning. Unlike most who I offer the challenge to as 99% sure they won’t take it, I offered it to Mark despite knowing he had a much higher probability of accepting it, since he’s tech savvy and active in the broad crypto space. But in my view, if he accepts, then that’s also evidence on the spot that it works. He declined my 21,000 sat offer and politely still talked anti-Lightning. So, I said since I like him, I’d up it to 210,000 sats. He still declined and talked more anti-Lightning. He spoke about how he *wanted* it to work, but the problem just isn’t solved yet. My inner Nostr Lyn couldn't help it, so I upped it to 2,100,000 sats, or $1,700+ USD, if he would just post a way to pay him on Lightning within the next ten minutes. Nobody had ever taken me up on my challenge, so I pressed to my highest offer ever just to see, out of sheer curiosity. He’s a multi-time published novelist, which with my recent fiction hobby, interests me. So, if there’s someone I want to claim the bounty, might as well be him. And then you know what? He did. Of course he had a Lightning address. He went from “want it to work but…” to digging through his past experiences and finding an old Lightning address, within a few minutes. The first person on Twitter/X to accept my challenge. I paid him 2,100,000 sats on the spot, or $1700+ USD. He provided a Stike address, so that’s a shout out to @jack mallers who made Lightning convenient enough for Mark, who doesn’t understand or particularly like Lightning, to finally call my challenge and make me have fun staying poor, lol. And it worked flawlessly despite being an above-average sized Lightning transaction. I then asked Mark if he could identify the sending wallet, but he said he couldn’t. He asked about block explorers to identify the payment, and while I pointed him toward Mempool Space, I highlighted that Lightning tends to make sending privacy pretty good even though I didn’t maximize privacy on this one. I'm not deep into the weeds on privacy tech, so I'm always genuinely curious just to ask "hey, can you identify any privacy leaks here?" I also asked him if he would have shared his bank details publicly like he shared his Lightning address. He said of course not. So even if people say “But Lyn, Mark used a custodial wallet”, I’d say that this tech stack reduced his friction and boosted sender privacy. I think there are still improvements to make of course, particularly Lightning combined with other scaling methods (ecash, Ark-style stuff, and so forth), but it’s a powerful glue that connects a lot of things together. In addition, when it comes to payments and small amounts of working capital, there is an important “choose your own adventure” aspect. For small amounts, in safe jurisdictions, custodial Lightning is not that big of a deal, like keeping cash in your wallet that is prone to theft or loss. It maximizes UX. But it’s important to keep pushing hard, keep developing, keep providing capital, to make as many tools as possible available for people that need to maximize privacy and/or self-custody. Not everyone needs or wants those capabilities for every single payment, but they do need the *option* to turn to them when it’s important. Mark Jeffrey then reached out to chat about fiction. Last year he asked me to go on his podcast to talk about Broken Money, but I fell behind on Twitter/X DMs due to bandwidth constraints and didn’t get back to him. So, after this I got back to him and said I’d be happy to talk about fiction with him to pick his brain, and talk Broken Money on his podcast, and we got one scheduled. 🤝

Replies (136)

Kingbee's avatar
Kingbee 9 months ago
That's a lot of sats to win someone over, but that's your business. Satoshi's quote comes to mind "If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry."
Machu Pikacchu's avatar
Machu Pikacchu 9 months ago
For what it’s worth, there are legitimate issues with lightning payments depending on your setup. For example, maybe I’m an idiot, but I had a roughly 90% payment failure rate with the Breez wallet. Phoenix works almost flawlessly. Mutiny wallet was great until they shut down. It’s possible some of the naysayers have tried Lightning via those apps and got burned over and over and have a hard time looking past that.
Wow! Great push. Mark could and should have had Strike send those sats to his cold storage because strike and cash app will do so 50,000 sats for free, no mining free, as long as you can wait 24 hours and usually this happens in about 3 to 5.
There are legitimate issues, which is why I highlight ongoing development, but: 1) medium-of-exchange usage in broad crypto is low outside of stablecoins. So Lightning is operating with that backdrop. 2) Many people wanted to use Lightning fully self-custodially, and perhaps it was over-marketed as such. It’s a 10x or 100x scaling improvement for bitcoin between entities, but there are still limitations for small users. Which is where it can combine with other tech. 3) The numbers are actually solid relative to how private it is, with no speculative token. Pure utility. Slow burn adoption.
Zryachiy's avatar
Zryachiy 9 months ago
Strike is not permissionless. And bitcoin is meant to be used by anyone, not just those in a "safe" jurisdiction. While lightning UX has improved over the years, it is still nowhere near ready for non-technical (or even technical) people to use in a truly sovereign, private and reliable way.
j_humphr3y's avatar
j_humphr3y 9 months ago
Not permissionless on his end if using strike though. At that point how is it better than cash-app or venmo?
The example you describe, "receiving funds with lightning" is not trivial at all in a self custodial way. Even when you open your own channel with an initial on chain transaction, you can not receive funds. You do not have inbound liquidity. You have to either spend the amount you want to receive first - or rent inbound liquidity from a third party. If this is not a terrible user experience, what is? Lightning only works well when you trust third parties. This is not a "p2p electronic currency". It is a permissioned system provided by third parties.
j_humphr3y's avatar
j_humphr3y 9 months ago
I did. Okay so sender privacy is better that's fair. Still think it's off the mark to brag about things being permissionless and working flawlessly with a larger than average payment when the receiver is on a custodial solution with a bitcoin bank. I have strong doubts that would have worked if he was using his own node.
Rosetta Cypher's avatar
Rosetta Cypher 9 months ago
I think it does have to do with the liquidity provider. Speaking as someone who recently got full setup online. Core Lightning working for me. Via Start9 server and I access my funds remotely through Tor via Zeus app. Took me a few weeks to figure out my problem, but is was.... managing my liquidity properly.
Cobweb's avatar
Cobweb 9 months ago
Most people who onboard onto Bitcoin will be relying on 3rd parties. There's space for both. The key is optionality. You have the option to do it yourself with minimal upfront costs
That is the "problem" with bitcoin and even nostr. It is complicated and not worth the hassle for the normal person. With Stike (while not as pure as the virgin mary) made it "easy" (reduced the friction) enough to use bitcoin & lightning and receive a payment in an instant. Just download the app and I'll send it to you versus self-hosting your own node. Most people do not and will NEVER want that (even though it is the best way to maximize the technology) Both ways are needed to maximize adoption.
Great experiment. Just shows how much integrity most ppl have. It takes courage and principles to not change their opinions and convictions when they are bribed. I like what you did but find the receiving person spineless. Let us all act with more principles and integrity...we got where we are because of corruption. It needs to stop and all of us individually need to act accordingly.
Rosetta Cypher's avatar
Rosetta Cypher 9 months ago
I'm new to BTCPay as of a few days ago. I successfully paid an invoice to myself though. Let us know if you remember the error or encounter it again. You don't have to use BTCPay of course. You could just select "Receive" feature on any custodial or non-custodial wallet. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water ☺️
A little Dylan for naysayers: "Your old road is rapidly agin’ ; Please get out of the new one if you can’t lend your hand"
Yeah that's the sad part about sending to someone's strike address. Might as well just donate it to the government
j_humphr3y's avatar
j_humphr3y 9 months ago
Why is "maximizing adoption" the goal? Good ux without sacrificing privacy and sovereignty should be the goal. If 80% of normies are never gonna use it correctly anyway, why are we chasing them down and making sacrifices to get them to use it poorly? When the goal is popularity you will get this kind of product. There are bitcoin apps you can download and "just use" without sacrificing sovereignty if you use onchain, even without your own node (though it's better with). Fees are low. There's little need for lightning. I don't outright hate lightning, but it has yet to deliver what it was advertised as and it's almost 10 years old. Also Mary had other kids, she didn't stay a virgin.
not the best example perhaps but the point stands we pay counterparties with CC all the time and it is "private" if being able to publicly post an invoice is the big advantage, maybe we need to rethink this.
it was made to be a p2p electronic currency. scaling with something which does not work well for a normie without a third party is completely against what BTC was made for.
Rad. What would have been even better would have been if he sent the sats back. Great story. Totally worth the price. Nicely done.
Super Testnet's avatar
Super Testnet 9 months ago
Lyn has a great thread about people who diss lightning: View quoted note → Lyn also observes that lightning has "boosted sender privacy." Which is true, but did you know? Lightning also has better *receiver* privacy than monero. Even if you use a bolt11 invoice, the sender learns less information than he would if you gave him your monero address. Lightning is so cool!
Just when I couldn’t like you more, for the authentic, educated voice you bring to the Nostr + Bitcoin space, you went and multiplied my respect for you a thousand-fold. I shared this story with my family who also see you as a powerful icon in our generation. Thank you Lyn Alden!
We should all do something similar with people despising Nostr. "If you post your npub within 10 minutes, I'll get you 10 real followers". 😄
personally i have tried lightning for several times and now that we are building a community, its very hard to convince into nostr and btc. is there any btc project that works like softnote by tectum? the paper money (physical aspect) side
Bitcoin-Minded's avatar
Bitcoin-Minded 9 months ago
To @Lyn Alden ‘s original point, have you tried a large payment like that on your own Lightning infrastructure? “Strong doubts” sound like you have not. That dude that claimed the bounty has not worked on figuring it out and trying it. He’s just fortunate that Strike exists and made it easy. FYI I routinely send and receive payments larger than that over lightning in a non-custodial way. It works well and gives me quite a few unique benefits. Not saying that as a flex, but trying to offer a data point rather than an assumption. 😃
With #cashu on nostr you don't even have to ask for any address, strictly speaking. You can just lock ecash to anyone's pubkey and if you publish that on a relay that the other party sees and has access to(eg his inbox relays) then it's done. The money is there to be claimed, only spendable by that person. Now, of course this is better UX if the recipient has published Mint preferences on nostr (like a LN address) because that's explicit trust in that Mint. In [SatShoot](https://satshoot.com) we only let parties pay each other with Cashu if recipient has this "preferred Mint List" event(kind10019) published. But all that said, you indeed can prove that Cashu works in a *permissionless* way with nostr. And btw, this can work if sender and recipient don't have overlapping Mints, or the recipient only has LN wallet. LN bridges that gap between the Mints and all of the Lightning network. I ask for a LN invoice from destination, and "melt" my ecash in exchange for payment of the LN invoice by my Mint. Magic.
Lightning derangement syndrome! Classic
Scrotus's avatar Scrotus
People don't even know. It's absurd. Shit coiners (aka CrYpToBrOs) claim to be knowledgeable about "crypto currencies" act light lightning isn't even a thing.
View quoted note →
The p2p part is the computer network of nodes, an onchain tx is not p2p; miners are not your peers. Lightning however is p2p. In any event, the point was TRUSTED third parties, not third parties to begin with. Not entering the discussion or making any point, just clearing op the lingo
Bitcoiners these days "Onboarding through third parties" "Privacy from fellow men more than enough" "ETF's are so much more convenient than self-custody" "Strategic reserve will make us all rich (in fiat)" Bitcoiners are a disgrace. They completely lost the plot. Crazy how little fiat NGU bribing it took to get over former ideals. We're not even at $100k which represents a mere $40k in inflated fiat terms and people are sacrificing it all for the Mammon.
Of course we wanted to use it non-custodially. It was promised as a solution to scale Bitcoin, not to make it custodial with enormous privacy downsides.
BTW, when some people say 'Lightning doesn't work' sometimes in fact they mean 'LN is not used (much)'. Which has some truth to it, but it's a different statement. I think LN technically would be capable to handle much higher volume and intensity usage, but the limit is not technological, but the limited number of motivated actors, both on seller and buyer side.
Well in that case Lightning isnt necessarily p2p either. The hops between you and someone else you are paying isn't your peer. Unless you're directly opening a channel with that person which, let's be real, isn't the case for the vast majority of these transactions.
Lol, credit cards and the banking system are abstractions and like most abstractions, eg Cashu, are more private than Bitcoin... Privacy and Bitcoin shouldn't be in the same sentence, unless one is willing to go through an intermediatary like Strike or Cashu... And sorry, but that's a non starter... The problem is that LN creates problems rather than solving them. Someone using Zeus embedded node should open a channel with 100k-1mil sats... Or God forbid, they need hardware to run their own node and keep it online. Then manage liquidity... Anyway my point is that you end up pushing people to custodial solutions the more you push these layers with massive UX issues on people. And that's fucked... We have convinced people that they're bitcoiners when they're effectively reverting to the fiat system of IOUs... Ffs KYC or Custodial solutions... It's all bullshit... Damn it people!!! There are other solutions...
Swing some this way. Currently working on an automated trading app. Built a couple of versions years back, finally got the window to do a simpler and better version.
Machu Pikacchu's avatar
Machu Pikacchu 9 months ago
I agree with your points and don’t want to come off as dismissive of lightning. I’m grateful for it and all the work being done in the ecosystem. I personally don’t mind the friction at this phase of adoption, but I’ve made the mistake of recommending lightning wallets to newcomers and when they run into the sharp edges it can set them back. Now I only recommend on-chain to anyone who hasn’t been sufficiently orange pilled.
Satking's avatar
Satking 9 months ago
A digital spark, a rebel’s gleam,Beyond the grasp of fiat’s scheme,Miners hum, their puzzles race,Bitcoin carves its timeless space.
j_humphr3y's avatar
j_humphr3y 9 months ago
I'm not against it, I just haven't taken the time.
Default avatar
Rand 9 months ago
i might consider a bet YODL/
j_humphr3y's avatar
j_humphr3y 9 months ago
Yes and there are several merchants in the comments here (even more important for them) who run into payments failing to go through. When you're a merchant, a failed payment will lose you customers. I'm not just blowing smoke. I wish it worked better. If you want proof that I made the effort and have been there since ye olden days: image
Default avatar
Rand 9 months ago
i waz commenting on windsok ^B^havoir/ *B* mE & Lyn/YODL jk john/ lolz
Default avatar
Rand 9 months ago
i like th@ sus/*****
Why? The more people adopt it, the more opportunities are available that it can be used daily. With bitcoin both ways can be used together. Just because someone else uses a custodian, doesn't mean you have to, but if no such custodian exists, they won't bother with bitcoin at all and then the opportunity to exchange bitcoin instead of fiat is gone. The "purist" mentality that ALL must use bitcoin in the most self-sovereign form is what will hold it back. I think that is the way it should be used, but I realize only a tiny minority of people will ever do it. It is like the Richard Stallman stance, not that he is wrong about free software... but the majority will never adopt his purism stance. But I guess we can all just HODL our bitcoin and zap each other.
Default avatar
Rand 9 months ago
my grammar school friend IZ getting another ultralight/ he was a transport pilot for yearz
Bitcoin-Minded's avatar
Bitcoin-Minded 9 months ago
Man I don’t know what to say. It feels like we are living in different worlds.
I hate lightning, please send sats :P Now seriously, sending to strike is almost like sending mainchain coins to a Coinbase address. And with mining fees under 1 sat/vbyte, it may be cheaper to use main chain.
it's not the same, if you use mainchain coins you leave a print that if don't poorly can lead to other knowing more about how much bitcoin you have as Lyn did it, nobody can know how much bitcoin she has or make any connection to her. we all know it was her because she said it publicly on twitter, but had it been a private conversation nobody outside the sender and receiver would have known that Lyn send it. On the other hand the recipient has little privacy, but well that was his choice xD
j_humphr3y's avatar
j_humphr3y 9 months ago
Conversely if people keep using these things in permissioned, custodial, registered ways and then get rugged or reported they're worse than if they'd used cash. Instead of fixing issues at the protocol or even app layer, "solution as a service" gets promoted and then people give up trying to fix the original issue. Influencers and service providers use the social layer to promote their products and say people who are critical arent trying, which is disingenuous. I don't care about having Saylor or the general public validating my choice to acquire and use Bitcoin. I care that it works when I need it.
Lyn just casually handing out Lightning wake-up calls like it’s no big deal. At this point, the “Lightning doesn’t work” crowd has two choices: 1️⃣ Accept a pile of sats and admit they were wrong. 2️⃣ Keep coping and stay fiat-poor. Mark Jeffrey chose wisely. Others? Still fudding from the sidelines. #Bitcoin #LightningNetwork #FortNakamoto
j_humphr3y's avatar
j_humphr3y 9 months ago
That sounds good but what do you actually mean by it? Im not just being contrarian. In an ideal scenario for you, are you paid in bitcoin and paying for everything in bitcoin? Or are you using Bitcoin for privacy and censorship resistance specifically? The answers to those questions determine the way you approach it and therefore the outcomes that you get.
Default avatar
Enfoxed 9 months ago
I love your work Lyn. Some people seem to be prejudiced against lightning. Thanks for sharing
So many people are like this guy. They just repeat what they heard and trust but did not verify. Good for you. 👏👏👏 Steep price to pay to educate him but a great lesson that we all need to push past the deniers that just don't know what they are talking about. Thanks 👍
@Lyn Alden has just come onto my radar this year, not sure why, nonetheless the more I read/hear/see what she is doing the more I’m impressed. Lyn is a Bitcoin treasure and we are better because of her. Thank you Lyn 🙏🏻
But lightning just works, AND IT'S PRIVATE. ONLY the retarded purists and LARPERS are the ones that bitch and moan. Easy, convenient, to the point. That's what money should be. In a world of purity tests and larping maxiamlists the pragmatists win. Let's keep pushing forward, we only win when we do shit.
Lyn Alden's avatar Lyn Alden
The other day on Twitter/X, I paid out a 2,100,000 sat or $1,700 USD Lightning bounty. Over the past couple years, I’ve offered an occasional challenge on Twitter/X. When people tell me Lightning doesn’t work, I often ask them in random comments for their Lightning details so I can pay them in the next 5-10 minutes on the spot, permissionlessly, wherever they are, with this payment method that supposedly doesn’t work. Every single time, they can’t do it. Because they haven’t even tried it. They’re just talking. I’ve done this a ton of times and nobody ever takes the sizable sat offerings. In Dan Held’s anti-Nostr thread, Mark Jeffrey was critical of Lightning. Unlike most who I offer the challenge to as 99% sure they won’t take it, I offered it to Mark despite knowing he had a much higher probability of accepting it, since he’s tech savvy and active in the broad crypto space. But in my view, if he accepts, then that’s also evidence on the spot that it works. He declined my 21,000 sat offer and politely still talked anti-Lightning. So, I said since I like him, I’d up it to 210,000 sats. He still declined and talked more anti-Lightning. He spoke about how he *wanted* it to work, but the problem just isn’t solved yet. My inner Nostr Lyn couldn't help it, so I upped it to 2,100,000 sats, or $1,700+ USD, if he would just post a way to pay him on Lightning within the next ten minutes. Nobody had ever taken me up on my challenge, so I pressed to my highest offer ever just to see, out of sheer curiosity. He’s a multi-time published novelist, which with my recent fiction hobby, interests me. So, if there’s someone I want to claim the bounty, might as well be him. And then you know what? He did. Of course he had a Lightning address. He went from “want it to work but…” to digging through his past experiences and finding an old Lightning address, within a few minutes. The first person on Twitter/X to accept my challenge. I paid him 2,100,000 sats on the spot, or $1700+ USD. He provided a Stike address, so that’s a shout out to @jack mallers who made Lightning convenient enough for Mark, who doesn’t understand or particularly like Lightning, to finally call my challenge and make me have fun staying poor, lol. And it worked flawlessly despite being an above-average sized Lightning transaction. I then asked Mark if he could identify the sending wallet, but he said he couldn’t. He asked about block explorers to identify the payment, and while I pointed him toward Mempool Space, I highlighted that Lightning tends to make sending privacy pretty good even though I didn’t maximize privacy on this one. I'm not deep into the weeds on privacy tech, so I'm always genuinely curious just to ask "hey, can you identify any privacy leaks here?" I also asked him if he would have shared his bank details publicly like he shared his Lightning address. He said of course not. So even if people say “But Lyn, Mark used a custodial wallet”, I’d say that this tech stack reduced his friction and boosted sender privacy. I think there are still improvements to make of course, particularly Lightning combined with other scaling methods (ecash, Ark-style stuff, and so forth), but it’s a powerful glue that connects a lot of things together. In addition, when it comes to payments and small amounts of working capital, there is an important “choose your own adventure” aspect. For small amounts, in safe jurisdictions, custodial Lightning is not that big of a deal, like keeping cash in your wallet that is prone to theft or loss. It maximizes UX. But it’s important to keep pushing hard, keep developing, keep providing capital, to make as many tools as possible available for people that need to maximize privacy and/or self-custody. Not everyone needs or wants those capabilities for every single payment, but they do need the *option* to turn to them when it’s important. Mark Jeffrey then reached out to chat about fiction. Last year he asked me to go on his podcast to talk about Broken Money, but I fell behind on Twitter/X DMs due to bandwidth constraints and didn’t get back to him. So, after this I got back to him and said I’d be happy to talk about fiction with him to pick his brain, and talk Broken Money on his podcast, and we got one scheduled. 🤝
View quoted note →
Here's how Dan Held responded when when I politely pointed out that he's full of shit as it pertains to Nostr. He took the path of cowards.
Lyn Alden's avatar Lyn Alden
The other day on Twitter/X, I paid out a 2,100,000 sat or $1,700 USD Lightning bounty. Over the past couple years, I’ve offered an occasional challenge on Twitter/X. When people tell me Lightning doesn’t work, I often ask them in random comments for their Lightning details so I can pay them in the next 5-10 minutes on the spot, permissionlessly, wherever they are, with this payment method that supposedly doesn’t work. Every single time, they can’t do it. Because they haven’t even tried it. They’re just talking. I’ve done this a ton of times and nobody ever takes the sizable sat offerings. In Dan Held’s anti-Nostr thread, Mark Jeffrey was critical of Lightning. Unlike most who I offer the challenge to as 99% sure they won’t take it, I offered it to Mark despite knowing he had a much higher probability of accepting it, since he’s tech savvy and active in the broad crypto space. But in my view, if he accepts, then that’s also evidence on the spot that it works. He declined my 21,000 sat offer and politely still talked anti-Lightning. So, I said since I like him, I’d up it to 210,000 sats. He still declined and talked more anti-Lightning. He spoke about how he *wanted* it to work, but the problem just isn’t solved yet. My inner Nostr Lyn couldn't help it, so I upped it to 2,100,000 sats, or $1,700+ USD, if he would just post a way to pay him on Lightning within the next ten minutes. Nobody had ever taken me up on my challenge, so I pressed to my highest offer ever just to see, out of sheer curiosity. He’s a multi-time published novelist, which with my recent fiction hobby, interests me. So, if there’s someone I want to claim the bounty, might as well be him. And then you know what? He did. Of course he had a Lightning address. He went from “want it to work but…” to digging through his past experiences and finding an old Lightning address, within a few minutes. The first person on Twitter/X to accept my challenge. I paid him 2,100,000 sats on the spot, or $1700+ USD. He provided a Stike address, so that’s a shout out to @jack mallers who made Lightning convenient enough for Mark, who doesn’t understand or particularly like Lightning, to finally call my challenge and make me have fun staying poor, lol. And it worked flawlessly despite being an above-average sized Lightning transaction. I then asked Mark if he could identify the sending wallet, but he said he couldn’t. He asked about block explorers to identify the payment, and while I pointed him toward Mempool Space, I highlighted that Lightning tends to make sending privacy pretty good even though I didn’t maximize privacy on this one. I'm not deep into the weeds on privacy tech, so I'm always genuinely curious just to ask "hey, can you identify any privacy leaks here?" I also asked him if he would have shared his bank details publicly like he shared his Lightning address. He said of course not. So even if people say “But Lyn, Mark used a custodial wallet”, I’d say that this tech stack reduced his friction and boosted sender privacy. I think there are still improvements to make of course, particularly Lightning combined with other scaling methods (ecash, Ark-style stuff, and so forth), but it’s a powerful glue that connects a lot of things together. In addition, when it comes to payments and small amounts of working capital, there is an important “choose your own adventure” aspect. For small amounts, in safe jurisdictions, custodial Lightning is not that big of a deal, like keeping cash in your wallet that is prone to theft or loss. It maximizes UX. But it’s important to keep pushing hard, keep developing, keep providing capital, to make as many tools as possible available for people that need to maximize privacy and/or self-custody. Not everyone needs or wants those capabilities for every single payment, but they do need the *option* to turn to them when it’s important. Mark Jeffrey then reached out to chat about fiction. Last year he asked me to go on his podcast to talk about Broken Money, but I fell behind on Twitter/X DMs due to bandwidth constraints and didn’t get back to him. So, after this I got back to him and said I’d be happy to talk about fiction with him to pick his brain, and talk Broken Money on his podcast, and we got one scheduled. 🤝
View quoted note →
Default avatar
jennyboo 9 months ago
God bless and guide you properly in all you do If you haven't switched to the QFS and signed up for your Quantum Access Account yet,I want to urge you to do so while you still have the time Procrastination is a mindset. It is the condition of the mind that says “I’ll do it tomorrow.” or “I just don’t feel like it right now. When we procrastinate, we put off something important in exchange for doing something else, even if that thing is nothing at all. Think about it. If you choose to do nothing, technically you are still choosing to do something. Procrastination kills slowly and before you realize yourself it might be too late Get started with the Recommended financial system QFS to ensure full safety of your funds and Assets For more inquires and guides on how to get started with the QFS, Reach out Derekjohnson is a great man i recommend to lead us through this great phase in time. You should contact him on Telegram through the link below or you could leave him a mail. Telegram: https://tme/@DaviDXRPIonofficiall Email: davidxrplion.chat22@gmail.com
Default avatar
jennyboo 9 months ago
God bless and guide you properly in all you do If you haven't switched to the QFS and signed up for your Quantum Access Account yet,I want to urge you to do so while you still have the time Procrastination is a mindset. It is the condition of the mind that says “I’ll do it tomorrow.” or “I just don’t feel like it right now. When we procrastinate, we put off something important in exchange for doing something else, even if that thing is nothing at all. Think about it. If you choose to do nothing, technically you are still choosing to do something. Procrastination kills slowly and before you realize yourself it might be too late Get started with the Recommended financial system QFS to ensure full safety of your funds and Assets For more inquires and guides on how to get started with the QFS, Reach out Derekjohnson is a great man i recommend to lead us through this great phase in time. You should contact him on Telegram through the link below or you could leave him a mail. Telegram: https://tme/@DaviDXRPIonofficiall Email: davidxrplion.chat22@gmail.com
Default avatar
jennyboo 9 months ago
God bless and guide you properly in all you do If you haven't switched to the QFS and signed up for your Quantum Access Account yet,I want to urge you to do so while you still have the time Procrastination is a mindset. It is the condition of the mind that says “I’ll do it tomorrow.” or “I just don’t feel like it right now. When we procrastinate, we put off something important in exchange for doing something else, even if that thing is nothing at all. Think about it. If you choose to do nothing, technically you are still choosing to do something. Procrastination kills slowly and before you realize yourself it might be too late Get started with the Recommended financial system QFS to ensure full safety of your funds and Assets For more inquires and guides on how to get started with the QFS, Reach out Derekjohnson is a great man i recommend to lead us through this great phase in time. You should contact him on Telegram through the link below or you could leave him a mail. Telegram: https://tme/@DaviDXRPIonofficiall Email: davidxrplion.chat22@gmail.com
Default avatar
jennyboo 9 months ago
God bless and guide you properly in all you do If you haven't switched to the QFS and signed up for your Quantum Access Account yet,I want to urge you to do so while you still have the time Procrastination is a mindset. It is the condition of the mind that says “I’ll do it tomorrow.” or “I just don’t feel like it right now. When we procrastinate, we put off something important in exchange for doing something else, even if that thing is nothing at all. Think about it. If you choose to do nothing, technically you are still choosing to do something. Procrastination kills slowly and before you realize yourself it might be too late Get started with the Recommended financial system QFS to ensure full safety of your funds and Assets For more inquires and guides on how to get started with the QFS, Reach out Derekjohnson is a great man i recommend to lead us through this great phase in time. You should contact him on Telegram through the link below or you could leave him a mail. Telegram: https://tme/@DaviDXRPIonofficiall Email: davidxrplion.chat22@gmail.com
Default avatar
jennyboo 9 months ago
God bless and guide you properly in all you do If you haven't switched to the QFS and signed up for your Quantum Access Account yet,I want to urge you to do so while you still have the time Procrastination is a mindset. It is the condition of the mind that says “I’ll do it tomorrow.” or “I just don’t feel like it right now. When we procrastinate, we put off something important in exchange for doing something else, even if that thing is nothing at all. Think about it. If you choose to do nothing, technically you are still choosing to do something. Procrastination kills slowly and before you realize yourself it might be too late Get started with the Recommended financial system QFS to ensure full safety of your funds and Assets For more inquires and guides on how to get started with the QFS, Reach out Derekjohnson is a great man i recommend to lead us through this great phase in time. You should contact him on Telegram through the link below or you could leave him a mail. Telegram: https://tme/@DaviDXRPIonofficiall Email: davidxrplion.chat22@gmail.com
No. You said that it depends if you have a direct channel, which is wrong. You don't need a direct channel; intermediate hops/nodes are also peers. It does depend on if you controll a node in the first place, yes, ofcourse.
A few days ago I got my staff to download Wallet of Satoshi. I paid them on Lightning and they could immediately withdraw/spend/convert to Mpesa (KES) via @Tando.me the magic part was how quickly they grokked the whole process cos they insisted on how they can buy/earn more sats and save % of their wages in btc. If Lightning works in Kenya, then it works everywhere 😀 @Lyn Alden