Super Testnet's avatar
Super Testnet
npub1yxp7...399s
Open source dev w/ bitcoin focus | supertestnet.org bc1qefhunyf8rsq77f38k07hn2e5njp0acxhlheksn
The average number of contracts processed per day on robosats, since its inception in 2022, is 15. Today they processed 137 contracts. Robosats is running hot today. robostats.supertestnet.org image
If you ever feel like your product or service would lose users by providing them with the truth (informed consent), stop and reflect. Honesty is only in conflict with adoption among scammers. If you ever feel that tension, sacrifice adoption, and keep being honest.
We just entered a new signaling window for bip110 There are zero pro-bip110 blocks in this window so far image
A layer two (aka "second layer") is a service where users can send their bitcoins and then transact on the service with reduced impact on bitcoin's blockchain, where users can withdraw their bitcoins by getting one or more bitcoin transactions confirmed. It is not a second layer if, without changing bitcoin's consensus rules or using a 51% mining attack, a group of one or more third parties, and/or the service itself, can render any user's ability to withdraw invalid.
Super Testnet's avatar
Super Testnet 2 weeks ago
I think I found an unexpected problem with the most liquid BIP110 prediction market. image It defines the "Yes" condition based on a mix of timestamp ("11:59:59 PM") and blockheight ("the BIP-110 activation point"). But since those are not always in sync on bitcoin, there's a chance that we simply haven't reached that blockheight yet when we reach the timestamp when the measurement is supposed to happen. In that case, the Yes condition would obtain unexpectedly: if we are only at block 965660 at the timestamp, instead of 965664, then -- at the time of measurement -- there won't be any "blocks that violate BIP-110 constraints" from BIP-110's activation height forward...but only because we haven't reached that blockheight yet. So a person who thinks BIP110 won't activate might find it reasonable to bet Yes anyway, because even if BIP110 never gets enforced, you can still win if blocks just get slower than we currently expect them to. Link to the market: Click "Show More" under "Description" to see what I mean.
Super Testnet's avatar
Super Testnet 2 weeks ago
My latest invention is Forkalicious: a contentious fork visualizer. image The website creates three characters, Alice, Bob, and Carol. Alice runs a "standard" bitcoin node that ignores the BIP110 soft fork. Bob runs a node that enforces the BIP110 soft fork. Carol runs a node that rejects the BIP110 soft fork. Then you pick how many miners enforce the rules of BIP110, from 0% to 100%. Then you generate blocks based on that assumption, and see how the blockchain looks on Alice's node, Bob's node, and Carol's node. Try it here: Video demo: