Replies (124)

Children don’t have the same freedom of speech or censorship protections as an adult, freedom of speech and free will come with the consequences, consequences that children neither do norshould face as they are mentally not developed enough to understand them. Adults can do what they want, children should be protected and guided and saying this just makes you seem weird.
You're a sick liar Banning a girl for posting nudes probably isn't protecting or guiding her imo, but you're beyond help even trying to say "protecting or guiding" about some of the other shit the authorities do with this
No you are sick by saying that you support CHILDREN posting pornography on the internet. That is not β€œfreedom” that’s pedophilia
* Infantilizing 16 year olds by calling them "children" * Infantilizing 16 year olds by calling attraction to them "pedophilia" * Downplaying the weight of the actual pedophile mental illness by conflating it with precisely normal human attraction * Downplaying the weight of actual predators by conflating them with pedophiles
g's avatar
g 2 weeks ago
The beatles are overrated. Kanye hasnt had a good album since MBDTF. Eating animals raised via factory farming is immoral. Colonialism was a good thing. Mass democracy is the greatest threat to human flourishing and ingenuity. The jews dont control the world.
Promiscuity should be penalized in some matter. Or the alternative version of this is The Free Love/Sexual Liberation Movement was perhaps one of the worst things to happen to society, & led to many, if not most/all the problems we face today.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 2 weeks ago
Don't put words in his mouth; that's just lazy. He could very well simply support censorship in certain cirumstance.. Like, I strongly believe that taxation is theft. But I also believe that theft is sometimes ethical. Try to be a bit more creative!
Maybe because asking a child for nudes is not only a felony that will land you in jail, but more importantly completely sick and unethical.
Why you acting like that’s weird that’s basic human decency.
I just doubt it. I think humans tend to fail each other sometimes and culturally normalized people tend to be outright abusive. But even if you're not abusive, you still fail and act selfish or whatever sometimes. Or you don't and I'm missing something
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 2 weeks ago
Read my posts! I thought I explained it pretty clearly! WLD didn't say "I support child porn". WLD said "banning children is censorship." Again, nothing about that statement implies that WLD thinks banning children is wrong. He could just as easily have believed that censorship isn't always wrong. Man, it's no wonder people struggle so hard to engage with eachother when they can't even play the most basic of semantic games...
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 2 weeks ago
Probably my most controversial belief is that prepubescent children are sexually attractive. I'm trying to think if I have many other beliefs that have caused angry arguments before. Here's one that people REALLY hate. Euthanizing pets is usually doing the owner a favor, never the pet.
AI agents farms plus normies using standards operating systems will all be running malicious bitcoin nodes whether they know it or not to seize control of the software supported.
I've never asked any gf at any age for nude photos. Even with my skillset, I can't guarantee "the bad people" won't get hold of them (especially police). But nobody can steal photos that were never taken :p
I love me an opiniated female voice. So student loans are steadily stucking up, huh?
Now that's an efficient way to make a mute list! Congrats! Oh you are among them, haha. Darwin award!
That's incredibly based. I have a psychological complex where I really want nudes, and when I was 15 I didn't have the maturity to recommend a girl never take nudes. A few years later I did have that maturity, but most girls/women take nudes anyway, so I'd still ask for them if she was taking them anyway. At my age I mainly just want Digit's nudes and it's painful AF that they've fallen into "the wrong hands" (wsb users have leaked them to each other) but not mine. And I know I'm weird for saying that, it's a psychological complex like I said. On the other hand, the original context was a girl posting nudes publicly. In that case, she bravely doesn't care who sees, she knows bad people can see and she accepts that. That's very different from a girl being tricked to think her phone is "secure" when it's not. I think it's healthy and based, society disagrees.
Internet censorship started going crazy under the Obama Presidency After censorship stops happening to everything except Obama slander, the hate and conspiracy theories against the Obamas will keep getting worse and worse Eventually, the Obamas will beg us to stop censoring the slander, let them just be normal and free to say bad things about, like everyone else. And we'll look down and whisper, "no"
How do you measure controversial? By the number of people who would disagree with that opinion? By the number of people who would want to kill me for stating it? Or by the number of special agents that would hunt me down and torture me to death for spreading it?
The problem is all apps sharing the same NIP-65 relay list. Users should be able to configure their relays on a per-client basis. But NIP-65 is basically an exploit vector that allows users to DoS themselves, and many of them already have.
I don't disagree with app relays being used as a starting/jumping off point for those either new to Nostr or dipping their toes into it whilst still electing to use the fediverse as their primary social gateway; it took a good bit of autism wrangling to get @γƒγƒ£γƒŽγ•γ‚“ to get set up with both an NIP-05 address (which to my knowledge shows up everywhere aside from Ditto) and an independent relay list so that all his stuff gets synchronized on a per-client and relay level (mostly) without issue.
Imagine if Reddit's onboarding was like nostr's "Yeah you can join communities. You can even create your own community with your own rules ✨" and the first thing they saw was /r/circlejerk and had to wade through that first before they could #growreddit
The kinds are all broadly useful, even kind1. Its when you assume everything needs to be included into The Nostr's relay soup to just participate in the technology that everyone outside of technology appreciation gets a weird ick from
I was about to ask... Is it ok if I use public relays to some infrequent broadcasts between some hardware? Or I will be shot on sight? Lets say 10 per hour per host, lets say some amount of hosts
puzzles 's avatar
puzzles 2 weeks ago
Only if it has onchain zaps ⚑️
odin's avatar
odin 2 weeks ago
really? then why can lions and tigers make a liger? or a horse and a donkey make a mule? did you know that a goat and a deer can have viable offspring? thank you for proving its a controversial view, no one would bother replying to my retardation if its wasn't...
Can't see what you are replying to, but YEAH!! *Shakes fist at OP*
The males of those crossbreeds are all sterile and the gestation periods of deer and goats are so different, that their offspring are usually premature and die in the wild. That's what keeps the species separate. You don't need misceganation laws to stop it, as Nature already does. If you're so completely overrun with their offspring that you freak out and setup separate watering holes and territories because they're well on their way to becoming the majority of the population, because they are _more demonstrably and successfully fertile_ than the rest, then it's safe to say that they are the same species.
odin's avatar
odin 2 weeks ago
whatever you say, lady. you seem way more invested in countering my idea than I am in having it. thanks for the free rent!
As an able bodied, mentally intact, anti-communist, neurotypical, hetronormative cis-white male, I would rather just post on Reddit, where at least I have a chance at a fair and rational discussion.
It's a hard problem, and devs work toward solutions as they can. But again, it's a hard problem, so those solutions take time. But in terms of scope - it's a global/macro/open system problem. Just like you don't care to access every website on the internet, you don't care to connect to every relay. You care for a select few, and generally trusted set of relays. The sharpest answer to this problem that doesn't answer global scope is two sided. (1) Devs surface relays that are generally trustable (like a search engine aims to surface generally trustable websites), they can even offer - as I mentioned earlier - hard coded relays. (2) Users choose their relays, leave relays that don't meet the user's standards, associate with other users to advocate for good relays, warn for problematic content, warn for relays that don't manage themselves. There are some ways to formalize this. Relay reviews, events that use a sort of "gossip propagation" passing information about trusted and malicious relays, but that's a collective action problem.
It __was__ a place for speech and grass roots discussion. Aaron Swartz did co-found Reddit. It became appropropriated, used for advancing capital, among other means. One of the most defining nails in the coffin, outlining its capture.
There are natural paths resulting from selection pressure. Return to monke and edit it out. They're dire things and they're how individuals in civilization work. Civs decline because of this drive, return to monke. And gene editing is the only other path which can and will be taken by individuals.
↑