Replies (94)

Phil's avatar
Phil 2 years ago
Is he using Crypto Anarchist as a slur? πŸ˜‚
Only 2 years ago, Canadian gov seizing and freezing accounts plus the super shady doxxing of donors on top... waiting for the 'muricans to do waaaaaay more than this when the rubber meets the road... Hope all you devs are readying preemptive soft forks candidates for when the time comes... Thanks in advance!!
Either this is a gross AI caricature of Saylor's selfishness and inability to fully grasp why #Bitcoin matters to the world, or he's an even bigger cunt than I thought. Regardless, #Saylor never seems to care about anything beyond "number go up", and Bitcoin simply doesn't work that way. You cannot take self #custody, #privacy, #uncensorable #MoE, etc. out of the equation. Period. Or you can kiss Bitcoin goodbye. A β‚Ώrother just saw that video. He nailed it: "He keeps saying "Paranoid Crypto Anarchists" as if it's an insult or something" πŸ˜‚ πŸ‘ πŸ’― It's an understatement to say that "Bitcoiners" still simping for this TradFi boomer in 2024 have lost their way, and will almost certainly lose whatever Bitcoin they think they own (for those who actually hold their keys). Good morning! 😊
utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»πŸ's avatar utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»πŸ
Michael Saylor is a fucking idiot
View quoted note →
Bitcoin Sikho's avatar
Bitcoin Sikho 2 years ago
Tell him to sell those coins and tank the fiat value, I don’t want that value, I’ll take the sats
It is a risk for large companies, not individuals! It doesn't matter ⚑⚑⚑⚑
Magnus's avatar
Magnus 2 years ago
He chose to trust Fidelity. He's not obliged to learn by history, nor obliged to verify. Good luck! I don't think we will see him using nostr either. He still trusts centralized solutions! Don't trust, verify!
Aeneas's avatar
Aeneas 2 years ago
Be real man, you are smart enough to understand that what you say is bullshit
OT's avatar
OT 2 years ago
How's he going to sell bitcoin to wall st if he's associated with crypto anarchists? Time to pivot
I've been saying this for years. Saylor, Trump, Thiel, etc are not on our side. They do not want a Bitcoin revolution. They want a bitcoin backed dollar, with KYC and AML, they hate self custody, they hate privacy, they hate freedom. We must not let these people dictate Bitcoin policy or they'll turn it into a CBDC.
utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»πŸ's avatar utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»πŸ
Michael Saylor is a fucking idiot
View quoted note →
I am a firm believer in the old adage "it's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and prove it." That being said, Saylor needs to open a dang history book. Even the ones offering a whitewashed version of history would tell him that the people DID NOT willingly give their gold to the government. They gave their cans and nylon pantyhose willingly, not their gold. Not their value. Not their worth. It was taken by a government mandate. Saylor fanboys, come get your leader. He's lying.
utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»πŸ's avatar utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»πŸ
Michael Saylor is a fucking idiot
View quoted note →
lol to a you clowns who think any of these β€œpersonalities” give an actual fuck about your perceived narrative. Bitcoin literally keeps on ticking and does not give a fuck.
Well, it's in line with how he talks. It does not come as a surprise to me at all. In how far it is Machiavellian talk to appease his Wallstreet friends I don't know.
Yes. Hi Mike. Were you able to speak to the CEO? What’s his updated stance on paranoia? image
Thank you CSO!🫑 I’ll try not to spend it all at once πŸ˜‚πŸ«‚
β€œThis politician knows that inflation and taxes are theft. He just can’t say it while he’s playing the political game.” Same energy
πŸ€” …the frickin quant is correct😳🀨 …this is why I try to remember to include the following disclaimer with my posts: I am an idgit…even my mother says soπŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈπŸ€¦πŸ½β€β™‚οΈβ­•οΈ image
Some of his points are valid, but I'm okay spending the little money that I did on a hardware wallet vs giving control of every goddamn sat I have to someone else. I don't feel like the loser in that trade.
Moist's avatar
Moist 8 months ago
so good to see. I've been saying Saylor is a twat fot ages, but so many think he's some kind of messiah. he's not, he's a very naughty boy
Moist's avatar
Moist 8 months ago
fair play to him, hes fleeced a lot of people. but wait until the mob with the pitchforks come after him once they realise. is he hoping to use solana to cover his btc positions πŸ˜…
that woman seemed sort of off to me when i watched it.. and saylor saying "crypto anarchists" didn't seem natural. plus, he has been equally skeptical about governments before, and i think he has previously talked a lot about self-custody... this smells
Old post lol. Yeah, watching again it seems off. I think I was asking in earnest too at the time. Saylor is a lying liar when it comes to proof of reserves being unsafe, so who knows ... maybe he would say something like this (still seems more unlikely than not to me though).
More confusing to me if it's not though. Why would he dismiss self custody like that? Makes no sense if you're bullish BTC. That's like day 1 realization
He's talking to normies and to statists and to the state agents. He's playing a Machiavellian game with them. He wants to remain in their good graces and prevent the state growing suspicious and jealous of his company. He's sneaking Bitcoin in and trying to preserve his status as relatively untouched by the state. It may actually be a defense. It is also possible (and probable) that he is ideologically captured and believes that governments are indeed inevitable and that you can keep the state on your side indefinitely without it usurping your industry.
This is great! He is not wrong. It depends on how you view the world and what actually happens in the future which is highly dependant on what we do, believe and teach.
Buy my "I didnt seize the bitcoin, people voluntarily bought my not bitcoin bitcoin stonks backed by the bitcoin that was seized. I didn't go door to door"
↑