Jag kollade precis på John Campell angående en studie från 2014 , om RDI av vitamin D , där de kom fram till att gamla beräkningar var fel. 400-600IU är ~20ggr för lite. Man måste få i sig 8895IU för att 97,5% av populationen ska få ett ett OK serumvärde av 25(OH)D på 50nmol/L eller mer. De nordiska näringsrekommendationerna NNR 2023 rekommenderar 10mcg ~ 400IU. https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/4a45a5/globalassets/publikationsdatabas/broschyrer-foldrar/slutleverans_nordiska-naringsrekommendationer-2023.pdf

I think one issue with nostr today, is that we by default choose to store files/images/videos/memes on some single point of failure services. They will eventually disappear. Not resilient or scalable.

This!!! View quoted note →

@Martin Enlund angående senaste podden: det är inte konstigt att folk har problem med östrogen o testosteron när de är rädda för kolesterol.

@Saifedean Ammous View quoted note →

I’m listening to Saifedean’s *Fiat Standard* lectures on the *Bitcoin Standard* podcast and keep coming back to one unresolved question. 1. He stresses that everyone should run their own node; node operators keep the network decentralised—“don’t trust, verify”—and I agree. Today this still works, because ordinary people regularly transact on-chain. 2. He also argues against raising the block-size limit, since larger blocks make full-node hosting more expensive. Most day-to-day traffic, he says, will eventually move to Layer-2 or Layer-3 solutions, leaving the base chain for occasional settlement. My problem: if the bitcoin price rises 100×, on-chain fees climb with it, and only banks (or similarly large entities) ever write transactions to the base layer, what incentive remains for everyday users to keep running nodes? Should we still expect ordinary people to verify the chain when they themselves will “never” use it directly? #asknostr #btc #bitcoinstandard