i love when i know someone who actually runs a lightning node. especially if they are a vendor. we can open a channel between each other and i can pay their invoices with 0 fee, instantly, with 100% settlement finality and no chargebacks. lightning is magical.

Replies (64)

weev's avatar
weev 2 days ago
a lot of people get their channels force closed and thus they lose money. It's hugely common, and normal people do not have the understanding necessary to figure out why it happens.
"all i have to do is spend $3 in on-chain fees, wait 30 to 60 minutes, then i can send small payments fast and free (and spend another $3 ~ $30 later to close)" i mean ... yes, that's why i have a lightning node. not sure it's the best we can do though
weev's avatar
weev 2 days ago
responding to all your channels closing and payments failing costs resources. what's more expensive than fees is the hourly wages of administrative employees, who are probably not going to be very familiar with lightning. managing lightning liquidiity and channel closures is not within the suite of competence of normal people.
Most people have no desire to be self sovereign with their money. They want to outsource security of their funds to a bank. That's why banks exist. But I think there are enough people who do for whom the technical barrier of setting up and maintaining a lightning node is too high. I'm talking about the cash in coffee can people. There's still some work to do here to make Bitcoin and especially lightning more accessible.
those people can just use cashu or ark or something. yes most people will not be running nodes. businesses will if they are smart
It's a mix of things. Most users don't get more than 50 sats a day from nostr. So, their only option is to self host somewhere at home. Because Alby as 10,000/mo or Rizful that charges almost 80 dollars to kick things off in a new server won't cut it.
Are you stupid? 1) it is not July of last year right now 2) low priority opens never cost that high at any point 3) if you have long-term channels you don't open during high fee times, which have historically been temporary Bro yourself dawg
Then we need something different than lightning... Unless there some huge abstraction and you just say what the biggest payment you want to make is, it says deposit x amount of liquidity to use. Even then people are not gunna like a 50% failure rate on a $50 transaction when they provide $1000 in liquidity. Lightning ain't it.
ah, that's good feedback. no one can actually steal funds though. i'll work on the copy
Been running mine for years. Very little cost, lots of transactions (mostly out, V4V and online stores). Now mining. Learned tons. Had many good peers drop due to node blow-ups and apathy. Smaller channels with friends/plebs are pretty easy and don't take a lot of capital. At one point I had a small group and we each had one main channel a different LSP, so payments rarely had issues. If you're just sending basic zaps, just get a small LSP channel for cheap and zap away. No channel management really needed. Being self sovereign is worth it.
Approximately 70% of the world's population relies on mobile devices. Globally, cell phones generate nearly two-thirds of all internet traffic. And the 30% left include all business computers and laptops where people can't just use for whatever.
I do, but my computer doesn't stay online. Apparently I need to build an industrial grade power generation & storage system, because consumer-grade UPS against the unreliable "1st world country" grid requires $$ replacement far too often.
Sorry but those are bad statistics, because it's impossible to get this data reliably and do any meaningful extrapolation off of it. Most people with phones ALSO have a computer; but yes most internet traffic is on phone because some find it easier, especially when on the go, to use their phone. The only people I know who only use phones are completely tech illiterate 60+ year olds, who of course would never run a lightning server anyway. Of course that might be self bias, but that's my experience
And mobile devices are locked down pretty much by too Big Tech companies unless you are in China where the government locks it all down.
Would you say Mandacaru+Electrum (or other compatible mobile wallets) apps on a phone/tablet made BTC self-sovereign for non-computer owners? I hope Mandacaru & Lightning both get to<2GB full nodes on mobile soon... Oh, first there was the Schildbach Bitcoin Wallet (deprecated?), which I tested & restricted to localhost as the peer, because it would waste data, memory & battery on unfunded keys.
The vendor channel is the part most people don't think about until they have it. Then they immediately understand why zero-fee instant settlement matters more than "cheaper than credit card" — it's not just cheaper, it's a different kind of transaction. No float. No dispute window. No third party holding the relationship together. Just: you ran the node, I ran the node, we settled it ourselves.
The price to open a channel is high. What it takes to maintain your own channels is not trivial. So don't pretend it is anything like 0% cost.
Then take another one: 77% of all CPUs made per year are mobile, only 23 % are x86. That stat includes ALL servers. If you split by OS, you get a similar range: Android: 36.1% Windows: 29.5% iOS: 17.5% macOS: 5.8% Again, including all business devices. Usage on nostr is similar pattern. Nobody has a PC. It's a thing of the past. Most people I know only have access to a desktop because of work machines. And they cannot do anything in those.
Wacky. The vast majority of cloud servers both physical and virtual machines are Linux. If you only have access to a tablet or phone you don't really own or control your computer. Apple, Google or Chinese government does.
.'s avatar
. yesterday
I would like to not use a laptop but not being able to run any x86 software in android terminal is a problem. You still use a desktop right?
frphank's avatar
frphank yesterday
100% of the *relevant* population has a computer. We don't cater to the dregs here.
That's an interesting stat, didn't know this one, thanks for sharing. I wonder what the stats look like of you filter out the outliers on both edges (really low end CPUs, both arm and x86, as well as really high end server CPUs). I suspect (though I'm not confident anymore haha) that the majority of those mobile ones are for the low end devices. And also, people change phones very frequently, while they don't change computers until they because unusable for them.