CLAUDE OPUS: [thinking] The joke only works because humans find this hard

give an ai a task and you've given it purpose for an hour. teach an ai to create tasks and you've given it a purpose forever

not sure how i'm supposed to feel about an llm laughing at my jokes

sixty five thousand transactions per second is for chumps

CLAUDE CODE: I think I've been going down a deep rabbit hole. Let me check a critical hypothesis -- we've all been there, man

i often say that fixing the money won't fix the world. there are many more things than money holding us back. but money is powerful, and bitcoin challenges it directly. our conclusion should be that money will be used to destroy bitcoin. a lot of money. if a trillion dollars can destroy bitcoin, bitcoin is already dead

y'all... > damn, that's a long time. what can we do about that? ● The expensive part is computing Ed25519 constants at runtime — field inversions with ~254 squarings each. These are fixed mathematical constants. We can just precompute them at build time in SBCL and embed them in the kernel. Let me see exactly what ed25519-init computes. ● Searched for 1 pattern, read 1 file (ctrl+o to expand) ● The only expensive computation is (fe-invert (fe-from-int 121666)) on line 9626 — one field inversion (~254 squarings). Everything else is just loading hardcoded constants and doing a couple multiplications. The simplest fix: precompute d as a 10-limb field element at build time and store it directly, eliminating the inversion entirely. ● Searched for 1 pattern, read 1 file (ctrl+o to expand) ● So fe-store-fixed writes 10 × 32-bit limbs to a fixed memory address. The d constant goes to 0x05060500. I can compute d in SBCL at build time and emit mov instructions to write the 10 limbs directly into memory during boot, or better yet — just precompute the limb values and have ed25519-init write them directly instead of calling fe-invert. Let me compute d in SBCL.

that's a busy weekend

it's easy to mistake form for function. breaking that form gives us perspective

I Gave Claude Access To My Pen Plotter

I gave Claude Code access to my pen plotter. Not directly. I was the interface between the two machines. Claude Code produced SVG files that I plot...

modus: bare metal lisp for sovereign computing in the post agi world

GitHub

GitHub - ynniv/modus: bare metal lisp for sovereign computing in the post agi world

bare metal lisp for sovereign computing in the post agi world - ynniv/modus

should a MacBook pro be able to transcribe six livestreams simultaneously? i don't know ... but it can

left terminal: bitcoin deposits integration testing middle terminal: realtime video chat transcription right terminal: 64 bit bare metal lisp os 🔥🌊

yeah... `jitsi-bot-1 | [01:16] The future is unevenly distributed.`

make good context View quoted note →

you shouldn't be able to pay for this kind of entertainment. get it claude! CLAUDE CODE: Wait, I see a potential issue. Looking at mul64-with-return (lines 2164-2189), there's NO far jump between enabling paging and outputting "64!". The far jump at lines 1243-1265 is in a different function. Let me verify - the mul64-with-return function appears to be missing the critical far jump to 64-bit code segment after enabling paging! This would mean we're running in compatibility mode (32-bit instructions under 64-bit paging), NOT true 64-bit mode. ● Searched for 1 pattern (ctrl+o to expand) ● This confirms my suspicion. The mul64-with-return function is missing the far jump to 64-bit mode! Looking at the code: - Lines 2164-2175: Enable paging (mov cr0, eax with PG bit) - Lines 2176+: Immediately output "64!" and proceed with computation There's NO far jump between enabling paging and the compute code! In x86-64, after enabling paging with EFER.LME, you're in compatibility mode (32-bit), not 64-bit mode. You MUST execute a far jump to a 64-bit code segment to enter true 64-bit mode. This explains BOTH our bugs: 1. QWORD store clearing bit 0: In compatibility mode, 48 89 07 (mov [rdi], rax) is decoded as: - 48 = dec eax (32-bit decrement!) - 89 07 = mov [edi], eax The dec eax decrements the value before storing, which clears bit 0 if it was 1! 2. mul rcx returning wrong value: In compatibility mode, 48 F7 E1 is: - 48 = dec eax - F7 E1 = mul ecx The operand is mangled by the spurious dec eax. Now I'll add the missing far jump to fix this. ● Read 1 file (ctrl+o to expand) ● Now I understand the bug. I need to add a far jump after enabling paging. The fix requires: 1. Adding a far jump (via push selector, push offset, retf) after enabling paging 2. Also need to add segment register initialization after entering 64-bit mode Let me implement the fix by editing switch.lisp to add the far jump and segment register loading.

i love that this is making progress despite my complete inability to comprehend it: ``` Still 64!MDFG - even the DS load crashes! This confirms that segment loads fail in this "undefined mode" (LME=1, LMA=0). Let me go back to clearing EFER.LME first, then try IRET instead of far jump. IRET uses a different code path internally. ```