Replies (31)

Amazing rollout but “forcing” this display unit while the whole network already uses the bitcoin/satoshi standards is non sense. It’s equivalent to using the mile unit in Europe, nobody does that and it just makes it more difficult, confusing and error prone to interface with Square bitcoin.
𓊽's avatar
𓊽 1 month ago
i can’t accept. how do u see a whole bitcoin? i really wanna know. or lets just do-away with 100,000,000 altogether? asking it only feels like restart for those who didn’t buy bitcoin at a dollar. OR u must be thinking a dollar is a dollar whether its 100 thousand or just 2. shouldn’t change names just because we want fractionalize it. damn u got me thinking. i don’t wanna like it so stop. lol.
Sats are sats. We also have a great symbol for it, although not in unicode yet. If ₿ is sats, how do you type 100m sats (1 Bitcoin)? Or is the idea to completely ditch the 100m number and reactor everything as sats/₿?
Bruh you just missed a teaching opportunity for 4 million businesses. Sats has been established for awhile now. wtf.
Except they're not Bitcoins. Lemme ask you is there $100 in 1 Dollar? Sats are the standard. Change it back and keep this train going. No one asked for this. No one uses this. Just you. You just unilaterally decided it. I'm not saying you don't have the right. It's your company. By all means do as you please. But this is confusing as hell and does not clarify or distinguish anything.
bitcoinIke's avatar
bitcoinIke 1 month ago
Will 0.1 ₿ be enough to retire in? I’m confused
BIP177's avatar
BIP177 1 month ago
me no wait til bitcoin $.001 agin so me buy 62.15 an be rich. den sell to 21M-coiners for hundy tousand eech! dey so stoopid.
Diyana's avatar
Diyana 1 month ago
Bitcoins... many, many bitcoins