Replies (60)

9x9's avatar
9x9 1 month ago
Haha saw that too
Bitcoin twitter died long ago. It's why I put up with nostr for so long. I deleted my twitter account once I knew nostr wasn't going away.
Increasingly X is just propagandists barking at each other with a few ignorant midwits in between thinking they’re witnessing a riveting conversation between people with a lot of conviction about their subjects of focus
Benking's avatar
Benking 1 month ago
😂 Wow, that was fast! Guess Bitcoin X didn’t stand a chance, on to the next adventure!
Default avatar
Sabatoso 1 month ago
Not gonna lie, it does suck and I miss it.
R's avatar
R 1 month ago
Victory is sweet.
That's not a flex, just means that genuine Bitcoin community is isolated from the rest of the world on a platform only they use, leaving the Bitcoin narrative to spooks and grifters.
VanHodl's avatar
VanHodl 1 month ago
The slop killed Twitter, impossible to use now. It's tiktok 2.0
"Nostr is dead" -> "I can't handle not having an algorithm to find content" Shit I used the web for a year before knowing what a search engine was. Fucking pansies.
No, however I think "liking The Cat" on X isn't going to get you guys very far. Spam is barely an argument anywhere else, and I think that's because it's not going to become a community concern until an existential risk can be objectively pointed out and seriously discussed. Right now it's just Matthew Krater doing his best to immolate his reputation.
To believe that it does requires one to believe that every technogist qualified to understand the problem and do anything about it is compromised and willfully withholding their input, except for one guy (and his nyms) who is practically addicted to heterodoxy to the point he doesn't even like the decimal numbering system.
What you basically claim is that apart from Luke Dashjr everyone in the anti spam side is not technically qualified to see the spam as existential threat. Which is ridiculous considering some of the people on the opposing side are Jimmy Song and Nick Szabo. Not to mention a bunch of very competent other devs with smaller followings like Parman and SuperTestnet. The devs you outsource your adversarial thinking to are all likely compromised. Adam Back and Shitnobi are just on the top of my mind. I can name many more.
nick-szabo has never contributed changes to bitcoin core. Neither have armantheparman nor supertestnet. jimmysong has never contributed production code to bitcoin core; only test coverage. All the people you have mentioned, besides Luke (even Shinobi and Adam Back) are ancillary thinkers, commentors or coders who have no proven pedigree for maintaining Bitcoin.
And here's the thing -- I LIKE ALL THOSE PEOPLE. I like them for what they have to say and also for what they have done with their projects that support and enhance people's usage of Bitcoin. I agree with them that spam is degenerate usage of Bitcoin and it would be PREFERABLE that it didn't exist. But that's very different than an existential crisis.
You are a shitcoiner my dude and you don’t even know it. “people’s usage of Bitcoin” sounds like something out of the mouth of a true Marxist. You say spam is degenerate and preferably it wouldn’t exist, but that degenerate spam exists precisely because the people that you *like* and *trust* did enable it for over two years until this degeneracy is now 40% of the entire size of the UTXO set and it’s a real hurdle for node runners, especially future ones.
That’s one of the lamest cope posts I’ve read on Nostr for a while. Maybe it’s the norm on X, I wouldn’t know. Either way it’s pathetic.
I hope they really freeze these “valid UTXOs” that normally you wouldn’t be able to spend even if you wanted, cuz they’re dust. I really hope they get this proposal over the line as a viable fork I could run. It’ll put a smile on my face even if it achieves nothing.
It’s interesting. In some ways leaving Bitcoin Twitter doesn’t make all that much sense, which is often the way with intuitive decisions, but it “feels” good I think many recognise this And you can see the ethical lines that Bitcoiners, emboldened by the adoption of sound money, now draw Hard no Protocol > platform Free speech > reach Property rights > UX Time will tell if this recipe can match, or outgrow the value of X today