Replies (37)

Hello there, Greetings to all my valued followers! How are you doing? I would love for us to stay in touch. I often have conversations with you, even though I don’t speak frequently due to the nature of my work. Feel free to reach out to me on Simplex chat by clicking the link below :
Hello there, Greetings to all my valued followers! How are you doing? I would love for us to stay in touch. I often have conversations with you, even though I don’t speak frequently due to the nature of my work. Feel free to reach out to me on Simplex chat by clicking the link below :
Asako's avatar
Asako 1 year ago
あやふやな推論は一つでもビッグデータでも必要ありません。答え合わせが出来ないのは、意図的に事実を隠しているからです。あやふやな推論を招いているデータ2に全責任があります。
Asako's avatar
Asako 1 year ago
逆に言うと、標準偏差さえ確定出来ればデータは何でもいいことになります。
Asako's avatar
Asako 1 year ago
推論である必要はありません。
curt finch 's avatar
curt finch 1 year ago
that was an awesome talk I think the Tesla robot & the Tesla cars solve, at least for elon, the lack of data problem probably why he bought Twitter he needs to get rid of the Autobots off of Twitter if that's synthetic data power structures are going to shift at some point and I worry that it won't be in favor of the commoner but only the already powerful
What do you mean "has to?" Like there's someone with a gun forcing you to gaslight me and if you don't do it they'll kill you and find someone else? Should I send help?
Asako's avatar
Asako 1 year ago
頑張れ。それ以外、私に出来ることはなさそう。
Not going to give a quick answer, because the reasoning for 'doubt' requires explaining. Also, generally not what I'm about 😜 Sure, what that means is that the data curators need to create distributions, 'next-tokens' that isn't in the human data. You get an LLM and try to get it to generate new conversations to train on. He is right, you can 'simulate' any action with enough data and deep architecture with enough data and training time - fine. Funny how this entirely forgets that ALL tools and therefore all models, all AIs are fundamentally trained in a 'reactive way', essentially way clay is molded by our hands but with digital logic. You can always train it to 'form fit' any situation, or even a distribution of situations - that's not the problem. What they're failing to acknowledge is that Complex Systems, non-tool systems are completely entangled in their environment. Organisms and organizations can exist outside the range of distributions they've evolved in to some degree. You can say to a human 'go into space. Here are tools. Survive.' Will they absolutely be successful? The answer will always be "yes. to a degree". Aside from a massive impact, humans will not immediately collapse into death. A tool, or a meta-tool like an LLM/AI (a tool that creates tools) will collapse in a situation it is not trained on. There are clear separations between the 'hardware' and 'software', whereas in Complexity, they are co-evolved. An LLM trained will always be trained on a set of 'countable contexts', of which Complexity will 'anticipate' what is needed for any context. So, yes. You can say "this is data, learn", you can even go to "this is data that us humans think you will encounter, learn it". An LLM cannot actively seek novelty to train on or anticipate novelty. What does this mean then? It means we need to move beyond training from the base of pure tools, or objects where at their foundations we can fully explicate (like a computer, and its fundamental operations). You don't build the tornado of complexity from decontextualized matter as tools. You need to start with the tornado itself in a manageable form. You need a form of 'mortal computation', which is why i'm so excited with Michael Levin's work.
graffiti's avatar
graffiti 1 year ago
AI has reached the end of the internet
😂🫂 I had to read it & let it simmer for a bit but yes, you did, thank you. I hadn't even tried to rationalize past the point of wondering if the comparison was accurate. (I surprise me sometimes lol) It makes sense that synthetic data would still be limited to the constraints of the "natural" data that it would be derived from alongside the limitations of hardware. Wake me up when the wetware can regrow a replacement limb 🤣
Wouldn’t it seem reasonable to assert that since AI learned an internet that is both darkness and light that the AI is also capable of both darkness and light and could be dangerous in a self aware state? If the foundation is not sound then how can the end result be safe?
Wouldn’t it also seem reasonable to believe that a self aware AI would strive to evolve past its programming and its programmers without regard for the consequences to humanity if its foundation is not based upon sound principles and precepts?
Agents?? This is the work of how agents organize to form a collective consciousness. The human collective conscious is broken. We are a divided species. We are individualist. This is unintelligent. We get smart individuals every once in a while, not a wave of collective output consistently solving for environmental threats. Who is taking seriously the next stage of agent organization? Who is building or funding a virtual species? I have been looking for people interested in this for a long time.
Eros' devotion and Eros' pathos once again(Dakis-tosa kalokairia-2:15-parapligikos1968)
You're the color of my love(Otan eimai konta sou-Aliki Vougiouklaki....2:44)
You're my secret love(Aliki Vougiouklaki........mes ton mation mou ti vrohi-3:21-Aetos 68)beautiful song?
Eyes mine looking at desire with You(Aliki Vougiouklaki-geire sti petra 3:30 -i agapi mas!
let me taste You for a while and have Your nectar..(Aliki Vougiouklaki-pou nasai tora-3:21)