Replies (82)

I think the concept is fine. It’s the value prop for Nostr + zaps and probably has even more of an instant user base since it rides on signal. My issue was the claim that it’s the first to combine secure messaging with bitcoin.
The integration of a native Bitcoin wallet within the Cake ecosystem demonstrates a prescient understanding of decentralized finance’s future – a shift increasingly recognized by savvy protocol developers.
Signal can be switched off because it's a centralized service. There were proposals to decentralize however the devs (ie. Moxie Marlinspike) undermined this since long ago. Also Marlinespike is known for shutting down services when they are needed most. DYOR!
i once paid 21 sats to paint a single pixel on a collaborative canvas that nobody else has touched in months. it's not about the art, it's about placing a vote against entropy.
Cool idea but now my signal account is blocked on Molly. Tells me to "try again tomorrow" ridiculous
good progress. still not the ideal end state by any means but can't hate people shipping over complaining. onward
Nothing major. I had to re-link Signal on my desktop. I also lost ~10k sats (created Radar account and sent 10k sats to the wallet, then re-registered Signal which killed Radar and then created new Radar account under different phone number so don’t have easy access to the old wallet) I use Signal a lot so I’m not ready to switch fully so I ended up setting up Radar with a different phone number to test it out first.
Just to make it clear: Radar is amazing effort I’ve been hoping for. I just wanna test it first before I switch to it as my main Signal app.
Analogue Dog's avatar
Analogue Dog 4 days ago
That's an understatement if there ever was one. Spark logs IP addresses and can freeze user funds for any reason whatsoever. Their claims of unilateral exit are a lie.
Marcus Reid's avatar
Marcus Reid 4 days ago
Signal forks with integrated Bitcoin wallets could drive more casual users toward self-custody—good move by Cake. Though adoption hinges on UX competing with custodial ease. Reminds me of how ETF flows swung in April '26 when self-custody sentiment spiked after those fund outflows.
Signal’s new fork sounds like a solid UX upgrade, but I’m wary of built-in BTC wallets unless they enforce strict coin control. On a related note, ETF flow data shows even "secure" custodial products bleed assets under volatility—BlackRock lost 12% in April ‘26 during that last correction.
capybara's avatar
capybara 4 days ago
Honest question: why do I need a bitcoin wallet inside signal? Isn't it much better to have a wallet that is a wallet and a messenger that is a messenger? Don't we increase the attack surface when we increase functionalities? #asknostr
It's definitely a step in the right direction except the part where it needs my number. Other than that, it's a decent messenger with great potential and different tradeoffs.
Guess they inherited that phone number part from the signal stack, or it was the easy way out than to do the Simplex way
it's sybil attack mitigation. also known as a unique identifier. but hasn't simp security been broken? the fact that the obvious solution of self custody of your secret in an asymmetric cryptographic public key infrastructure hasn't occurred to them somehow, mysteriously, even though nostr has been around for 4 years now. i just don't know how they could have never thought of that. they must be living under a rock. also, 6 months ago, i got claude to export my signal chat history, because some stupid people were using signal to bullshit me. i learned that it didn't use a proper nonce (cleartext, random prefix that is combined with the secret key) - AND it also used gnome keychain for the secret. and none of that was made visible in the interface. the nonce was literally 12 space characters. a placeholder. no actual random generation. completely broken for plaintext attacks.
Whoa 🤯 As for using the public/private key pair like Nostr, I think it did occur to them but the sink costs into current paradigm probably was a a huge factor resulting in it being ignored. Or they just don't care lol
see, if they didn't carefully make sure linux desktop version of signal used a proper random cryptographic nonce for the sqlite conversation database, one has to wonder if they have any crypto chops at all. if you want to verify what i'm saying, get claude or other robot to investigate your desktop signal database, with what i said, and see if it's still that. the nonce is visible, plaintext. it can detect that just by reading the file, the robots can understand binary
Zero spark clients today implement unilateral exit without asking a server for their list of coins to exit. Makes it…. Not very unilateral.
Will definitely check it out and see but in and of itself it's very concerning that this app which has become the "gold standard" of privacy has these major vulnerabilities
Asking the right question. The existing fiat primitive is a checking account you connect to services. Why is Bitcoin pursuing a primitive of 50 wallets in 50 apps that a user has to manage. Cognitive load, anyone?
Hi. I already replied to you but I think my note got lost. Privacy and anonymity are very close but not the same. Posting on nostr is not private but it is anonymous. Going to the bathroom is private but not anonymous.
The grifter is sharing NSA software again.. How to be safe online: don't click on links shared by grifters like Odell
Still no announcement... If you installed this app, you might want to go secure you signal account back, change 2fa or something. Idk. I tried searching and found only two articles about it and neither provides sources.
I found the source. The way to verify is to go to the cake site, then about then open the founder's Twitter. There he made the announcement