The US government just seized 127,000 BTC from a guy who operated forced labor crypto scam compounds in Cambodia.
This marks the largest seizure of any kind in history.
Login to reply
Replies (51)
JFCβ¦
Tax Neutral
View quoted note β
Could you plug a link. I want to read more
Fuck him
Reserve funded? Lol
Hopefully they can return to people.
SBR seed money in the bag π
οΏΌ
Is That guy a CIA guy and That was where the US cripto was ? x)
source link please
Probably an exchange
Budget neutral ways
Fuck no the Bitcoin Reserve is based on confiscation.
When OPs say βNo one can take your Bitcoin!β
I just shake my head.
View quoted note β
Will they give it back to the victims this time? Or is it okay to steal if somebody stole it first?
*government
Jameson Lopp, Peter Thiel (Cofounded Palantir Technologies (chairman) β a dataβanalytics software company serving government and commercial clients.), Maven 11, Mirana, dao5, Erik Voorhees, Balaji Srinivasen, Nikil Viswanathan, Mert Mumtaz.
The fiat hate cucks who are trying to turn Bitcoin into Ethereum like shitcoin.
View quoted note β
View quoted note β
View quoted note →
View quoted note β
View quoted note β
Filters work. Jameson Lopp is an evil shitcoiner who is running a malware.
They have kept OP_RETURN clean and let data under 83 Bytes.
Core devs who lied us that filters do not work are compromised.
Especially the ones who used inscriptions as excuse which they themselves intentionally allowed.
Bitcoin Knots is keeping Bitcoin Freedom Money clean of spam, jpegs and csam.
& that will become the ballast of Americas SBR
HODL
Should have use Monero π€£π€£π€£
#SHUM
#HFSP
If he had used monero it would almost triple the marketcap.
Were these fools just keeping it all on an exchange?
They can capture wallets, not the spirit.
Everything they own is stolen
The DOJ stated that he had the keys on his person.
Do you believe that? that seems so weird
It may well be a clear cut crime, but bear in mind you are taking their word for it. They have straight up lied in many similar cases.
It's actually unclear upon closer inspection, just how they accessed his keys.
Have the DOJ sign a message from several of the addresses, I'll wait.
The message should be "We totally have his keys and aren't just seizing the man"
Wonder if heβs got more stashed somewhere.
But he's still at large...
He should have hodled
So the us DOJ will have to give all these coins to the scam victims again? π
People already give their governments a free pass to murder and steal, no need for an excuse
So that's how they build their #SBR in a budget neutral way. π
The government murders and steals every day, why would it give a fuck about the victims? It doesn't care about the crimes either, other than the perpetrators are not "in the club". In which case busting them scores loot and some good PR.
It's called a $15 wrench
Yes, but if the United States government is involved, itβs more like a $1,500 wrench.
I thought it was sex trafficking.. thanks for posting. Wouldn't it be interesting if the gov could pay off what debt we owe using Bitcoin.. Capital gains treatment of Bitcoin has to be revised..
Bitcoin fixes this
The only real crime that has been proven at this time is asset forfeiture by the feds.
Maybe heβs trying to escape
View quoted note β
View quoted note β
I am not defending any kind of scammer but it seems the only way the US govt earn their Bitcoin is from seized scammer BTCβs.
I thought it was unseizable?
"Maybe you need a Monero" - some famous guy
View quoted note β
Stay humble, seize sats.
View quoted note β
"Those funds (the Defendant Cryptocurrency) are presently in the custody of the U.S. government."
Okay, if it was forced labor scam. It all should go to victims and what is left should go to people who have been forced to work there. Not a single satoshi should go to US government
View quoted note β
nevent1qqsyq89md670xjhhsdg47qvkkr6cngn4lsy7rdq6quqzkg43d7algxq0jhelv
US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve increases by 127K bitcoins.π
View quoted note β
Yeah, 'custody' can be a bit ambiguous. Furthermore, if the government indeed had control of the keys, why not simply transfer the funds away from still plausible control by the defendant?
"61. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:
(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
(b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;
(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or
(e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided
without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(b )(I), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of the forfeitable property described in this forfeiture allegation."
https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/media/1416286/dl