Saylor thinks you are a paranoid crypto anarchist if you hold your own keys and don't trust the government. He has always been a bad actor, I will repeat it as many times as necessary.

Replies (48)

We are paranoid bitcoin anarchists because banks and governments betrayed us multiple times. This time we take the power in own hands💪.
Nostress 's avatar
Nostress 1 year ago
I’m paraphrasing what someone else said recently, Saylor’s calibre, status and achievements imply that he carries a big target mark on his back. He has to constantly watch what he says and how he says it and may not necessarily agree with everything he says.
I am a paranoid crypto anarchist. I am an unregulated entity. The "money" in the traditional economy is dept. Bitcoin is money. My keys - my coins, that simple. No need to trust 3rd parties. I've already had my experiences.
Hermes's avatar
Hermes 1 year ago
WTF?? Is this AI generated, or is he really that dumb? 🤔
He is lying when he says it was voluntarily. From ChatGPT: The penalties for violating Executive Order 6102 were severe: 1. Criminal Penalties: Violation of the order was considered a criminal offense. Those found guilty could face a fine of up to $10,000. This was a substantial amount of money at the time, equivalent to more than $200,000 in today’s dollars, when adjusted for inflation. 2. Imprisonment: In addition to or in lieu of fines, violators could be sentenced to imprisonment for up to 10 years. 3. Forfeiture of Gold: Any gold not surrendered by the deadline (May 1, 1933) could be confiscated by the government without compensation. The government would seize gold that had been illegally retained by individuals or businesses.
They use fear so you buy their guns, and their hard-wallets?! I do acknowledge sensible taxes but I don't acknowledge the over printing of money, handing out golden parachutes to bankrupt CEOs and industries. Yes, I don't trust because of the bad actors who have held that position, now I verify. Gfy Ms. Saylor, just another legend fallen from grace. image
It's Saylor a central banker wannabe, or is he a central banker? Asking for a friend.
Some realize it early, others later, although some will still not recognize the game, and others are part of the game although they remain masked. When you understand the game you don't panic. So invest your time and effort in understanding the game and who is behind it.
Freebird's avatar
Freebird 1 year ago
In the same vein as "people took the ... jab voluntarily" when in fact many would have lost their livelihoods without taking it.
Not your keys, not your coins. Anybody who listens to this guy is bound for a world of hurt.
Sure, they did not go door to door and bust down your door and take your gold. They just went to the bank where you put your gold and told the bank to give it all to them. Which the bank promptly did. Since the vast majority of people did not own their coins, they were robbed.
Monero fixes this because you don't have any clue who's a small holder and who is a large holder unless they tell you.
Freebird's avatar
Freebird 1 year ago
Exactly... and still simping for Saylor
Bitcoin is for everyone (as you know), so as long as the ability to remain outside the tradfi system is there, then it doesn't really matter how some of the network gets used Can he change consensus? No... Rules but no rulers etc Point being, Anarchist Cypherpunks can remain just that. They will never be regulated Maybe we're not in total dissagreement here. I would of course not want to end up at the behest of the US DOJ, and have my abiliyt to self-custody impacted
Haha was wondering. Saylor like hey idiots I went on Rugpull Radio if you can’t see the signal in that you are retarded.
Basically, I'm saying that the "then they fight you" stage will be much worse than anybody else. Sure, I can hold my own keys and run my own node, and in theory, be totally self-sovereign. But in actual practice, that doesn't do very much unless I have a transaction peer. If they could make it onerous to *actually use the stuff*, then we have a problem. And they are certainly very adept in regulatory capture. It isn't going to be just "some of the network." They are going to map the entire UTXO set and link it to KYC identities over time. On a long enough timeline, there is no privacy. and if people don't think they're going to come for their share, then I think thats being very naive.
Default avatar
Fredfury 1 year ago
...you should no Not your keys ... Not your coins . #bitcoin
Default avatar
Vincent 1 year ago
I’m willing to bet anything to at he holds his own keys for at least some of his bitcoin. 💯