Saylor has always been an excellent example of a scaling problem.
Scaling to large companies and VC money necessarily invites these characters in.
They seek regulatory clarity to preserve their USD denominated purchasing power.
You want NGU?
You can have it.
The cost is the cypherpunk ethos that got bitcoin this far.
Regulatory capture is a real threat.
Login to reply
Replies (7)
mfkers be like
"if only enough people buy bitcoin the state will cease to exist and it will all be rainbows and bunny rabbits"
please grow up.
Saylor has always been an excellent example of a scaling problem.
Scaling to large companies and VC money necessarily invites these characters in.
They seek regulatory clarity to preserve their USD denominated purchasing power.
You want NGU?
You can have it.
The cost is the cypherpunk ethos that got bitcoin this far.
Regulatory capture is a real threat.
View quoted note →
because powerful institutions are interested in control.
not freedom.
Saylor has always been an excellent example of a scaling problem.
Scaling to large companies and VC money necessarily invites these characters in.
They seek regulatory clarity to preserve their USD denominated purchasing power.
You want NGU?
You can have it.
The cost is the cypherpunk ethos that got bitcoin this far.
Regulatory capture is a real threat.
View quoted note →
"But number go up, bro"
“They seek regulatory clarity to preserve…” so true dude. It’s always about number go up… Bitcoin seems to have lost its initial plans. Which is obvious when you have some jackass like Larry Fink saying he loves Bitcoin now
Saylor is leading the regulatory attack
Saylor has always been an excellent example of a scaling problem.
Scaling to large companies and VC money necessarily invites these characters in.
They seek regulatory clarity to preserve their USD denominated purchasing power.
You want NGU?
You can have it.
The cost is the cypherpunk ethos that got bitcoin this far.
Regulatory capture is a real threat.
View quoted note →
Saylor is a fiat maxi leading the charge for regulatory capture of bitcoin.
Saylor has always been an excellent example of a scaling problem.
Scaling to large companies and VC money necessarily invites these characters in.
They seek regulatory clarity to preserve their USD denominated purchasing power.
You want NGU?
You can have it.
The cost is the cypherpunk ethos that got bitcoin this far.
Regulatory capture is a real threat.
View quoted note →
Setting the stage for regulatory capture.
This was always the plan.
Saylor has always been an excellent example of a scaling problem.
Scaling to large companies and VC money necessarily invites these characters in.
They seek regulatory clarity to preserve their USD denominated purchasing power.
You want NGU?
You can have it.
The cost is the cypherpunk ethos that got bitcoin this far.
Regulatory capture is a real threat.
View quoted note →