Replies (101)

That’s not a good thing. That is sexual immorality on the same level as homosexuality. God intended for a man to have one wife, and for her to be older than 9 (unlike Muhammad’s favored wife Aisha)
How does Anarchism and believing in God and his rules for life work together? serious question.
Anarchism is a system in which all associations are fully voluntary. This is very much a Christian ideal. Anarchism is not lawlessness, it is voluntary lawfulness. In Christianity, every man is given a choice to sin and must come to God on his own, voluntarily. Forced conversion is ineffective, and so is forced morality under force of law. This is especially true when doing what is right is made illegal.
Maybe for anarcho-communists. Modern right wing anarchism is more closely aligned with the dictionary definition. Christianity is anarchist, because you can only truly submit to God of your own free will
Even more confusing to me that somebody can be anarchist and communist at the same time. 😉 How do i know that christianitys God is the real one, every religion claims their God is the real one?
You must simply ask Him. I was an atheist, but at my lowest point, Jesus came to me. As far as the Abrahamic God goes, the Christians have the best historical support, assuming you believe in one almighty God. Jesus Christ fulfilled the Jewish prophecies, and the Muslims plainly contradict the tradition. The logical monotheist must be Christian. The Tanakh ignores the Messiah, and the Quran contradicts itself. All other polytheistic traditions lead to God as well. They have reincarnation, where you reincarnate until you can become one with all things, this is essentially God, but it is missing out on His commands
Jews don't believe it hell though lol, but they do think Jesus was more of a witch doctor than a messiah. Also, the term "messiah" meant more political than ethereal. There were many messiahs before and after Jesus. And the Jews were looking for a messiah to free them from Roman oppression, instead of changing their customs and absolving them of their sins.
Believe what you want brother - but I think if you hold your statement as true it's not representative, which makes you a fool unfortunately 😔.
Default avatar
npub1r52w...euf3 11 months ago
Jesus, through the money changes over. Jesus was the Anarchus.
A significant segment of the Jewish population are atheist, yet many if those people still claim to be the chosen people living in the chosen land. That is literally the basis many are using for justification of wiping out and expelling Palestinians. There is a clear problem with Jewish supremacy, and that is something I denounce no matter the makeup of the claimants. Let's see how far they take this new EO. I think it's clear where this leads.
Exactly. It is likely the only way to be more and more free and help others do so also - the only way to actually live more ethically as well.
come on, some montain goat somewhere in iran can definitely keep up with some american 200kg blob woman thing
The issue with that chapter is it only applies to good rulers. If a ruler is going to satanic pedophile sex orgies and stealing 30% of your income to wage war and support evils like abortion, they are certainly not good. If an authority requires you to do evil, like a Muslim ruler requiring conversion at the threat of execution, you must certainly resist, even if only in speech.
Where does it say that it applies to good rulers only? Good or bad, God establishes it "Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. "
Christianity IS defiance. Jesus defied the Jewish authorities. Early Christians had to fellowship underground because their meetings WERE ILLEGAL. If the law required you to be Muslim, what would you do? Would you lie about your faith? Or would you defy them and be executed, like you are instructed to, like our Savior did? We are not to blindly submit to authorities, only to righteous authorities.
Oh the bible is clear about that too. The book of acts discusses that. We are to obey God. It is ok to defy the world leaders in your scenerio. Otherwise, the bible is clear: Obey your government. You are committing idolatry with your thinking.
The cop is part of the governing authority. Would you submit to him or not? Let’s make it less extreme, if the government banned going to church, would you submit? If they banned the Bible, would you submit?
Scripture says God lives in our hearts, not buildings made by man.. So screw Church. I would not submit to the Cop. but I will have to reap the possible bad outcomes and have faith that God will handle this
Oh wise sage, what am I idolizing? I am saying that defiance against a government that directly opposes biblical values is biblically justified. You just contradicted yourself. Our government steals, they murder, they commit more atrocities than you or I will ever know. They fund abortions, they fund sexual immorality, and they oppress Christians openly. It is our duty to defy them. I’m not advocating for a violent revolt, but for mass non-compliance. The early Christians meeting in secret was an act of defiance against the government, are they condemned?
God clearly doesn’t magically install rulers. Rulers come to power by many different means. Often they come to power by force. Does this make force an authority to be submitted to? What legitimizes a ruler?
You are turning Christianity into some libertarian hybrid and that is idolatry. Obey Scripture, authorities, until they try to take God away from you. That's it Anything else is you creating your own religion like you now the mind of the lord. Nobody does Government does bad things but God puts them all in there , according to scripture, for whatever reason we will not understand.
What does the Bible say about fellowship? Why would you defy the scripture as you understand it? Shouldn’t you submit to the cop? Shouldn’t you submit to forced conversion by a Muslim ruler? Shouldn’t you do everything the government tells you to? Why do you use Monero?
According to Acts, defiance is justified if the government opposes the will of God. Acts 4:18-19 makes it clear that we must make our own judgement whether the government is opposing His will
It says make your own judgement. I am 100% sure that transgenderism, war, theft, lying, and murder are all against the will of God. I am certain that 99% of politicians break their oath of office. I am sure that advocacy against the constitution legally precludes you from serving in office. I am certain that people who advocate against the 1st and 2nd amendment and then accept office are in violation of the law, and that the FBI failed in carrying out the background check of the official before allowing them into the office. I’m not a blind anarchist who believes in a violent revolt. Our government is not justified, neither under their own law, nor under God’s law.
You don't just make your own judgement. Where does it say that? > I am 100% sure that transgenderism, war, theft, lying, and murder are all against the will of God. Yes, goes back to Sin, and Mosaic law. Yes, bad shit happens. We are all sinners. And? Everyone is where they are for a reason
Yes we are all sinners, but we should not encourage sin. We should hate sin. We should be repentant, and lead others to repent, rather than enabling their sin. If our tax dollars are supporting evil, then we are supporting evil. It is our duty to defy a government that commands us to do evil.
No no no. " If our tax dollars are supporting evil, then we are supporting evil. " You are still trying to put Christianity in your own Ancap fantasy. That is idolatry. We don't really have much control where our tax dollars go. We have rules
We do have control of where our tax dollars go. We genuinely do. We simply do not exercise control. This is not idolatry. I put nothing above God. I worship nothing but God. Don’t go casting stones.
We do not live in a monarchy. This government was designed to enable discourse and protest. This system IS libertarian. How is advocating for a non violent reduction in the power of government in any way not in submission to the democratic form of government that we live under? It was designed so that I could do this.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Oh shit, that's another one. Add pedophilia to the list of benefits of Islam. Also, IIRC he actually married her at six. Nine is just when he started actually banging her. Alledgedly.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Wow, Jesus Christ was a based pedophile? Also, I love that the uploaders of that video put a big ass description explaining everything. Text is often a superior form of communication.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
She was probably just lying about it to make herself look cooler. Do you automatically trust every female when they say someone had sex with them? Also, based pedophile Muslims.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
My friend, I think that if you really needed my address then you would have it already. I can't help but notice you saying "what's your address" instead of saying "you're wrong about something you said." Is that because you would rather punish me for my speech than address what I say?
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Yeah, I'm a funny little guy, aren't I? Hehehe Can you say what things specifically? It might have been something I was hoping to get more of your perspective on.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Hmm, licking children huh? That does sound interesting, but I don't remember saying that. Can you post the nevent?
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Well you said earlier that what I said was wrong. Are you saying that I'm not actually as interested as I claim I am? Is there something else I said that you believe is incorrect?
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Let's see, as I understand it, to be "based" means to be courageously and authentically oneself, especially when others will criticize and look down on them for it. By that standard, pretending to be a pedophile for the approval of your peers isn't based, because that is very inauthentic. Keeping one's pedophilia a secret and never discussing it out of a fear that people will look down on them for it is also not based. On the other hand, a Muslim refusing to say "no I would never marry a nine year old" can be very based, especially if they would actualy marry a nine year old, and if you are judging them for it. Does that sound accurate to you? I'm a pedophile, so statistically I'm more likely to be gay, but I definitely didn't post that one either.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Oh shit! I just thought of a great comeback for you! "I can't help but notice you saying 'based pedophile Muslims' instead of saying 'good pedophile Muslims' Is that because you know that pedophilia is wrong and so you would rather focus on how much society punishes pedophilia?" What do you think of this zinger?
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Jeez bro, look at my username; I have a reputation to uphold. I would never say "pedophilia is wrong." If you pressed me on it, I would say "rape is immoral", or "viewing sexual photos or videos of children is wrong", or "children, especially pre-pubescent ones are incompetent bimbos and getting into a relationship with them is wrong", or "adults are all used up, and children shouldn't get into a relationship with them", or "pedophilia is a mental illness." But those statements are not as based as I'd like, and none of those statements make me look as much like a Scoundrel as I'd like, so instead here is a statement that I do like. The fact is that children are cute, and attractive, and I am thankful to be sexually aroused by them. If I said "pedophilia is wrong", that would be disingenuous, cringe, and frankly, a massive oversimplification if not false outright.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
I believe that in the story, the age of nine was chosen because that's when Eisha had her first period. It seems to me that she was certainly old enough to have sex at that point, though I'm sure you have something irritating you'd say about whether "she was young enough that she shouldn't have had sex." All of this is completely moot however, since girls are hotter before their first period.
It didn’t say she had her period. The instruction in the hadiths is that a man must wait until the child can have sex without getting injured, menstruation has nothing to do with it in Islam. They are not hot. They do not have a sex drive, and they cannot breed. Pedophilia is immoral. It is satanic. All pedophilic relations are rape.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Don't let the knee inflation fetishits hear you. Also, are pretty faces sexual things? Is it weird to get turned on by a pretty lady?
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Oh well, the particulard of Islamic doctrine go way above my head, I'm basically just repeating stuff I heard from others without any verification. Hang on, I'm going to try to merge this fork in our conversation, apologies for the inconvenience.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
Reply to the other chain: Pictures and sex dolls do not have a sex drive or the ability to breed, but can't they be hot?
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 11 months ago
>Implying I have any amount of self awareness whatsoever