did you know that 18,000 terrorists and suspected terrorists entered america during biden federal invasion?
#judged
Weatherall
weatherall@nostrplebs.com
npub1ljxd...3h7d
always positive, never disappointed. you know him. you love him...
liberty is, primarily, the right to study and apply the #law .
all other "liberties" stand on that duty.
and duty it is. for as we all know, an actual "right" is consonant with responsibility.
get to work, dude.


oops maybe not thought it was the thread - why not? up to five or something? looks nice.
View quoted note →
@Nostur killing it with nesting finesse on main feed!
Very nice….
#grownostr #nostr
takin’ #napps like latinos.


Gee... I wonder if the Bureau responsibly disbanded or at least downsized when Prohibition ended in 1933...
🧐
The Volstead Act, enacted in 1919, established the legal framework for Prohibition in the United States, prohibiting the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages. The IRS was involved in enforcing this law through its Bureau of Prohibition, which was responsible for investigating alcohol-related offenses during the Prohibition era.
View quoted note →
#law #history
"Conclusion: The Real Legacy of Prohibition
Prohibition wasn’t just about booze. It was a covert industrial war.
Rockefeller used his power and wealth to shape the law, fund the temperance movement, and back legislation that would quietly cripple ethanol as a fuel.
The 18th Amendment didn’t ban fuel alcohol. But the government’s regulations made sure it was just as dead.
And that, more than anything, is what handed gasoline — and Rockefeller’s empire — the throne."
View quoted note →

The Prohibition Lie, Part II: How Rockefeller Still Controlled Oil — and How the Government Quietly Killed Ethanol
The Standard Oil “breakup” was a sleight of hand. The 18th Amendment never banned fuel alcohol — but the federal government made sure it beca...
Lmao even Walmart is more based than you.
Robot or human?
#bookstr #history #civilwar #law
REVIEW: “Col. Seabrook hits another home run with his latest book, adding yet another weapon to our literary defense of the South: Twelve Years in Hell: Victorian Southerners Expose the Myth of Reconstruction, 1865-1877. It takes enormous drive and courage to write a voluminous work on a complex topic like Reconstruction, one that is both gloomy and heartbreaking - which is why even most 19th-Century Southern writers couldn’t bring themselves to do it. Kudos to Col. Seabrook for taking on the challenge! Since almost nothing you’ve been taught about Reconstruction is true, this book promises to be one of the most revealing reads you’ll ever experience.” - THE PUBLISHER, SEA RAVEN PRESS
https://www.searavenpress.com/product-page/twelve-years-in-hell
FIVE TYPES OF AMERICAN NATIONALS
There are four* types of American nationals recognized under federal law :
(*Note that 5 are listed below... either a typo or the 5th category is NOT "recognized" by fedscum... currently I am unclear on thsi . DYOR.)
1. STATUTORY CIVIL “U.S.** citizen++D”
1.1. A CIVIL status that is geographical.
1.2. Consensually domiciled within the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress.
1.3. Subject to the civil laws of Congress under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17.
1.4. Could consist of a human being or an office or civil status created by Congress and therefore PROPERTY of Congress. For example, a civil statutory “U.S. person” in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30).
1.5. If the citizen**+D it is a legislatively created fiction or OFFICE or CIVIL STATUS the OFFICER can act as a “RESIDENT AGENT” for the office and have a domicile INDEPENDENT of and not the same as the office. See, for instance, 26 C.F.R. §301.7701(b)-2. For instance, states of the Union in registering corporations and LLCs with the Secretary of State permit the resident agent to be physically within the state but domiciled OUTSIDE the county that is the situs of the entity. We know of no cases, however, where the resident agent can reside physically outside the entire state. This is because they would be in a foreign state and outside the venue of the states courts. They would not be susceptible to service of process under the circumstances.
2. STATUTORY POLITICAL "national and citizen of the [federal] United States** at birth” (statutory "U.S.* citizen")
2.1. A POLITICAL status not tied to a geographical place. Allegiance can exist independent of geography.
2.2. A status defined and found in 8 U.S.C. §1401 and 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(A), in the implementing regulations of the Internal Revenue Code at 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c ), and in most other federal statutes.
2.3. Born in the federal zone. Most inhabit the District of Columbia and the territories and possessions of the United States identified in Title 48 of the U.S. Code.
2.7. Also called “political U.S.* citizens”.
3. STATUTORY POLITICAL “nationals but not citizens of the United States**" at birth (where “United States” or “U.S.” means the federal United States)
3.1. A POLITICAL status not tied to a geographical place. Allegiance can exist independent of geography.
3.2. Defined in 8 U.S.C. §1408, 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(B), and 8 U.S.C. §1452.
3.3. Born anywhere in American Samoa or Swains Island.
3.4. May not participate politically in federal elections or as federal jurists.
3.5. Owe allegaince to the GOVERNMENT of the United States* and NOT the PEOPLE of the States of the Union, who are called United States***.
4. STATUTORY POLITICAL "national of the United States*"
4.1. A POLITICAL status not tied to a geographical place. Allegiance can exist independent of geography.
4.2. Defined in 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22).
4.3. Includes STATUTORY "citizens of the United States**" defined in 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(A).
4.4. Includes people born in stattes of the Union under 8 U.S.C. §1401(a) and "a person who, though not a citizen of the United States[**], owes permanent allegiance to the United States*" defined in 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(B).
5. CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL “nationals of the United States***", "State nationals", or "nationals of the United States*** of America"
5.1. A POLITICAL status not tied to a geographical place. Allegiance can exist independent of geography.
5.2. Defined in 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21), under the Law of Nations, under state laws, and under USA Constitution.
5.3. Is equivalent to the term “state citizen”.
5.4. In general, born in any one of the several states of the Union but not in a federal territory, possession, or the District of Columbia. Not domiciled in the federal zone.
5.5. Not subject to the “police power” of the federal government or most “acts of Congress”.
5.6. Owes Allegiance to the sovereign people, collectively and individually, within the body politic of the constitutional state residing in.
5.7. May serve as a state jurist or grand jurist involving only parties with his same citizenship and domicile status.
5.8. May vote in state elections.
5.9. At this time, all “state nationals” are also a “USA National”. But not all “USA nationals” are a “state national” (for example, a USA national not residing nor domiciled in a state of the Union).
5.10. Is a man or woman whose unalienable natural rights are recognized, secured, and protected by his state constitution against state actions and against federal intrusion by the Constitution for the United States of America.
5.11. Includes state nationals, because you cannot get a USA passport without this status per 22 U.S.C. §212 and 22 C.F.R. §51.2.
POLITICAL citizens” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1401(a) are synonymous with Fourteenth Amendment “citizens of the United States***”. Political citizens* 8 U.S.C. §1401 OTHER than 8 U.S.C. §1401(a) are privileged and may have their citizen status taken away by Congress.
Another important element of citizenship is that artificial entities like corporations are citizens for the purposes of taxation but cannot be citizens for any other purpose.
“A corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of that provision of the Constitution, which declares that the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States.”
[Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall (U.S.) 168; 19 L.Ed. 357 (1868)]
#law
lots of big wigg energy on #nostr .
do yourself a solid and eradicate the CIA's invasive wiggertech from your psyop'd and negatively-atrophied ego...
so you, you know, dont live your whole life trying to be something... you. are. not.
Who knew that the Idolatrous Rascals of Satan (IRS) has it's extortion racket and money laundry squarely located in Puerto Rico, hiding behind long-defunct Prohibition laws.
And who knew that the reason for this is that the entire rat colony was born of the petroleum cartel who conspired to outlaw alcohol to monopolize the automotive fuel industry - when this failed what, praytell, were they to do with the large federal police force created for "prohibition"...??
you guessed it - agents of the Idol.



I might advise against letting one of a 40-Trillion-in-the-hole-government's last big efforts be the introduction of an $10 trillion suborbital AI panopticon and pre-crime hallucinator.
#screamingintothevoid
Compromised #core niggers and bad actors unable to define spam for #bitcoin, but defining it for GitHub is easy.
gfy.
#core is linguistic nihilism. #rugthespammers
dependency upon hiding in and behind technological innovation is fake and gay.
learn the fucking #law .
the red circle is the root of the many legislative black holes that emanate from it. Its the 14th Amendment.
Hack at the root!
#repealthe14th #law
View quoted note →
#law
who knew that the first time they tried to pass the 14th Amendment, post-Civil War, that ALL of the southern states, save Tennessee, rejected it. Even a few northern state rejected it.
So the swamp thing decided to craft its Reconstruction legislation, designed to take over the South militarily, absolve their constitutional governments, divide it into districts, and force passing of the 14th Amendment as a condition of re-enfranchisement.
The Reconstruction Laws so reeked of a totalitarian takeover that all three were vetoed by then-President Johnson.
And Congress overrode all three vetoes.
Welcome to the New World Order... yer only about two centuries late.
read some of Johnson's statements on his veto of the first if you like:


Teaching American History
Veto of the First Reconstruction Act
