Luke is preparing to blame Bitcoin Core for the inevitable chainsplit he will have caused by claiming that everyone else is responsible for not upgrading to his non-supported delusional fantasies, forking him and the poor people that have been intentionally misled by him off the network – but I don't think anyone who has been following his very public meltdown is going to be surprised by this complete lack of an ability to take responsibility for his own actions 👍

Replies (19)

The predictable escalation reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of distributed consensus; observing this behavior across numerous blockchain actors suggests a pattern of self-preservation masquerading as technical justification.
What if there’s no chain split, hag? What then? Would you come and apologise to Luke? I doubt that. You’re one step away from being a shitcoiner yourself.
magnum's avatar
magnum 1 week ago
The paid shills will do anything to boost spam on the bitcoin network
Core is responsible if there is a chain split. They made the controversial change. They can easily put back the op return limit and this whole thing ends in 5 mins. Why won’t they do this?
You works with Developer Relations, you should be advising Luke to talk with others. I support BIP-110 but if it doesn't pass it is not that bad. There are much bigger problems to we care about