Replies (66)

Den Yellek's avatar
Den Yellek 1 year ago
How much bitcoin would you need to have dedicated to channel liquidity if you wanted to run a profitable and useful lightning routing node?
What do you mean by profitable? I've been running this node for 4 years. I don't try to do anything but run a node for my family. I don't sell channels either. I do use Lightning Terminal to auto balance fees for me. I don't do any management or babysitting any more. I haven't for the last 2 years. Ain't nobody got time for that!
Den Yellek's avatar
Den Yellek 1 year ago
By profitable I do not mean running a business but just not losing sats by running it. There are costs in opening and rebalancing channels and you would need to be routing a sufficient number of transactions to cover these costs. But as you ended by saying "ain't no body got time for that" perhaps this is just a level of complexity I should not delve in to and I should just rely on a private channel to a LSP.
Opening channels and closing channels does have a cost association. Choosing good partners can help here. I don't rebalance anymore. I find it easier or better to just juggle fees and to help liquidity move around. I do this with LITD now.
In good conscience I have to chime in on this post. It's awesome the revenue that Derek is making, but for anyone thinking about standing up a routing node, the majority of nodes won't be profitable. There are cost associated to open channels, rebalancing, and most of all, force closes. Here are my routing stats for approximately 5 months. What it doesn't show is that I'm around 150,000 sats in the red. Running a lightning node, in my opinion, is a great education in Bitcoin and contribution to the resiliency of the Lightning network. But save for the really large nodes, many won't be profitable. Take that for what it's worth. I'm my mind the sats that I've "lost" aren't a loss at all but the best education/experience I've had in the space. image
Derek Ross's avatar Derek Ross
My Lightning node earns generational wealth by routing transactions 🥹 image
View quoted note →
Is there a video or detailed explanation on how to do this step by step? I mean set you the lighting node to route transactions. 😃
Is it eating up that amount of money in hardware and electricity cost and time spent on maintenance (which has value, too), though?
Cool. On a per hour basis, I see that's almost as much as you've been zapped for making this comment.
Genuine question: if I were to run a self-hosted lightning node for private channels for my family & myself on my desktop, what would happen if I periodically shut down the desktop overnight? I’m looking into getting an umbrelOS/StartOS in the near future, but in the meantime to test it out, I’m curious to know the implications with running it on my desktop during the day & turning off the desktop overnight.
shyguy's avatar
shyguy 1 year ago
If you have poor uptime you want to choose good peers that are aware of your nodes habits and are okay with the downtime. Your peers can always close or force close on you. Regular closes are fine. Force closes can lock up funds for a few weeks. Worst case scenario is your node is offline for multiple weeks during that force close window and does not attest to channel state in time and loses the funds in that channel.
But only if your peer lies to the Blockchain about the channel closing balance. Not many people have the skill to do this.
Default avatar
Rand 1 year ago
U can dnld software on a sov. deck
Default avatar
szarka 1 year ago
Is that gross or net? I've "earned" more than that on my node, but after on-chain fees (and a bit of rebalancing), I'm still in the red.
So I’m assuming (with limited knowledge in lightning channels) the downside to this is that when my peers regularly close the channel d/t excessive downtime(s), I’d have to pay the default fee required to open a new channel every single time?
shyguy's avatar
shyguy 1 year ago
Indeed that would be another cost to consider when a channel peer closes on you. The best peers can be relationships you already have. They will be more likely to give you inbound liquidity and less likely to close on you without at least a message in advance. But hell with on chain fees where they are the juice will almost certainly be worth the squeeze. With tooling where it is today too now is probably the best time ever to experiment with lightning.
I could do the initial load in better hardware, then just transfer it to the NAS and configure the r-pi to point to it. might work... Is the full blockchain needed? can't i use the feature where bitcoind keeps only the last few blocks? (forgot the name of the feature)
yes that works, I've also copied the Blockchain around several times. Not sure about the "partial BC" feature, it's not recommended cause you can't verify completely.