Unfortunately another example of people without strong privacy needs making bad recommendations about privacy tools
Login to reply
Replies (23)
There is that ridiculous flag next to the woman's name. There is no point in expecting such people to make sensible or reasonable statements.
Do we have to summon Super everytime y'all bring this up?
I make it a point to only argue about people's *expressed* ideas
I don't infer their ideas and try to argue those
he would do an excellent job educating this person about the conditions of lightning's privacy
I don't think you can really judge someone for a flag next to their name unless it's the US or Israel
Except when you're insisting that everyone on earth must suck the petrodollar's dick
“I’ve been trying to stalk one woman on the internet for over a year now. And I made it my entire profile. And I made it my handle. But uhhh people should take me seriously about flags and borders so uhhhh yeah guys.”
get a room you two
Sorry, that's my chat bot I programmed to pretend to harass me
Nah. I’m a regular dude trying to basically get this guy to admit he’s a pedophile and a stalker.
I don't call loving Digit pedophilia or stalking, sorry 🤙
Sure yeah I believe you. You’re so honest and trust worthy and you always make so much sense.
Word
Would it make you feel better if I mentioned how I'm a pedophile? Or do I have to be a stalker too?
All or nothing
You are selfish. Selfish and unfair.
It’ll come back around. Next month we are doing interviews for single roles. Don’t worry you’ll get your time in the sun.
Oh. Ok. Disregard my previous reply. 🤗
„Enough“ privacy I was meaning to say. I lived in Zimbabwe a country that is ruled by a government that is detaining and killing people for their speech and opposition. I know about the dangers of having no privacy, I put myself in that danger. My lived experience from Zimbabwe is that self-custodial LN, Liquid and non KYC Bitcoin exchanged P2P is good enough (with BOLT12 privacy on LN will be increased). Monero has higher privacy that’s true, but you won’t find anyone accepting it or exchanging it to cash on the ground. And activists need the cash to be able to do their work.
Self-custodial LN is an oxymoron.
an LN channel is just a multisig transaction. either party can get their sats out, theres no reason that has to be custodial.
@MoneRogue that’s wrong.
Agree with @Hanshan If you hold the seed the sats can be unilaterally cashed out to the blockchain.
Having to rely on multiple people for a transaction to go through? Sounds pretty custodial to me.