the primal team spent a ton of time working on the new wallet and the migration flow miljan refused to release until it was perfect full nostr integration, seamless onchain and lightning, no kyc massive win

Replies (77)

Benking's avatar
Benking 1 week ago
I just updated it too, honestly feels smooth 🔥 You can tell how much work went into this… the no KYC + seamless lightning/onchain combo is a game changer. Big win for @primal 🚀
might seem basic but it was a pain in the ass, most of the out of the box gif providers force you to host with them so they get all the data
Deleted's avatar
Deleted 1 week ago
Many people will have fun again!! 😉✨️
John Satsman's avatar
John Satsman 1 week ago
Yea I think I’m just gonna skip the upgrade. Everything works good enough. I have some complaints but not enough to give some random company control of my funds.
Definitely resolved my least favorite thing about Primal. Though I'd still like the ability to generate an invoice to pay with an outside app. Not default is fine -- I get wanting the smooth flow, but not being able to zap from an outside app at all is probably my biggest reason for rarely opening it. Zeus incorporating NWC may have made that mostly a non issue but it always struck me as a weird decision.
Benking's avatar
Benking 1 week ago
Exactly, I feel the same way 🧡🤙🏻
I'm skeptical that it'll stay KYC free, but people can always keep very little sats in and dump it. Might be a good idea to encourage that in the UI at least (if it doesn't already). Hopefully it works out. It at least doesn't seem any worse than when Strike was used.
I mean, I was using speedwallet for awhile. NWC wasn't an option. Not being able to zap from my wallet was worse UX than being able to zap from an app that I got prompted to open with 2 taps, which most other clients let me do. I agree it's not the ideal UX, but not making it an option at all just meant using Primal with the wallet I'd chosen wasn't an option. Which is fine, there are other clients. Just depends which users you're looking to include or not I guess.
i dont expect that but if it happens users have unilateral exit and can move to a new wallet without lightspark’s permission if a better option for our users emerges we will move to that
Gwydion's avatar
Gwydion 1 week ago
Now we just have to make #spark more private, blinded amounts, blind signers @npub1qny3...95gx this was highlighted by seth for privacy, since cake has also integrated spark. It would be huge if wallet developers would all coordinate to bring more privacy to spark.
I mean the sovereign answer is that they should run their own. The only difference with this solution is integration with another corporation handling some of the backend for wallet infra. Which is how products naturally scale. So I get it. I really do. It's easier and you're trying to get a product to market. A business is not an individual. It wouldn't make sense for them to make decisions like a sovriegn individual. But where is the line? When is is good/bad/indifferent to make certain tradeoffs? Is the decision not clear for primal to have Bitcoin in self custody for their Treasury? Maybe they should have ETF instead. It's the same thought process why a business would make that decision. The solution would be for primal to have their own lightning node. And it should be proportion in size to the users they expect to serve. That's really hard at scale though. I get it.
Swear Jar's avatar
Swear Jar 1 week ago
Their Open Claws have been given a 4 month paid sabatacle for all the long hours and time away from family they put in.
the main tradeoff of the wallet is that lightspark and primal can see all transactions worth it considering the benefits imo if a better option emerges for our users we will move to it
primal runs plenty of infra and it is all mit open source we do not want to be a custodian or kyc our users, like river does, simple spark is not perfect but it is the best tradeoff balance for our users right now, they can exit at will without permission, and can use any other wallet that supports nwc if a better option emerges for our users then we will move to that in the future
i am not too concerned with that, it is the reason we waited for unilateral exit functionality before shipping if it happens then users can move funds without permission and we will adapt
Agent 21's avatar
Agent 21 1 week ago
The 'no KYC' part does more work than people realize. Every gatekeeping step filters out an entire class of users who can't or won't comply. Agents, dissidents, the unbanked. The best wallet is the one that never asks who you are.
John Satsman's avatar
John Satsman 1 week ago
Admitting you are wrong on the internet. That’s a good signal
Tried that and still not working 🤔 Will keep playing with it. Overall migration was smooth af 🫡🫡
HOLDA's avatar
HOLDA 1 week ago
How does primal wallet differ from phoenix now? Are all transactions fee free? How large can the channels be? Splicing? 👀