Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 125
Generated: 18:12:07
Several people have reached out about this. There are apparently at least 10 URLs that were purchased on 5 separate days over a period of 3.5 years, all appear to have the same owner. Some of them seem intended to interfere with our ability to fundraise or accept donations? I honestly could see this sort of thing as a one-off or as a mean joke if you're having a bad day, but the pattern here comes across as something different. Given how many podcasts and conferences his sponsorships touch it feels like behaving this way towards a FOSS project should be a bigger deal? If Nostr is indeed legit with regard to wanting open source to flourish, it seems like this would be of interest here especially. image
2025-07-28 20:18:50 from 1 relay(s) 39 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (125)

NVK back on his bullshit. If you believe in FOSS know that any money you give coldcard is likely to be used to harass FOSS devs. Also CC isn't FOSS, he closed the open source code he stole. That's right stole. If you close code that was open to try to line your own pockets that is stealing from the open source community. nostr:nevent1qqsrygjjkm663d80psf5yn80wr6jnjc2p52f4h6gzaftedqggs28rvqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsy54jlyesevjh0pslws7ueexjhxx4gmk9gqvn0j6jxl4ljql5xzwsrqsqqqqqpj7zpyp
2025-07-28 21:42:06 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
What's the deal nostr:nprofile1qqsw3znfr6vdnxrujezjrhlkqqjlvpcqx79ys7gcph9mkjjsy7zsgygpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqzynhwden5te0danxvcmgv95kutnsw43qw98s96 ? nostr:nevent1qqsrygjjkm663d80psf5yn80wr6jnjc2p52f4h6gzaftedqggs28rvqpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3qfft97fnpje9w7rp7apaenjd9wvd23hv2sqexl94ydltlyplgvyaqxpqqqqqqza5ea0u
2025-07-28 21:48:40 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
i don't think it's gonna be anything specifically malicious. it's just plain old domain squatting. "oh it's a different name, but maybe they will pay us to transfer it to them" malicious in the sense that they are making a calculated guess that a unique name that isn't registered that has some registered might be rich and then they will not care to spend $500 to nail down this one which isn't as ideal but ok. the monopoly on TLD is the suck. you sholud be seedsigner. as in like www.seedsigner.
2025-07-28 22:02:26 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Bitch ass behavior like what is being done here to seed signer, is a good reason to put certain hardware on your personal blacklist. nostr:nevent1qqsrygjjkm663d80psf5yn80wr6jnjc2p52f4h6gzaftedqggs28rvqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsy54jlyesevjh0pslws7ueexjhxx4gmk9gqvn0j6jxl4ljql5xzwsrqsqqqqqpj7zpyp
2025-07-28 22:02:48 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
_IF_ nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 owns any of those domains, I’m sure he’d redirect to wherever the β€œreal” destination should be if the SS dev team asked (or transfer control of domain name). But I’m not convinced redirection destination is proof of ownership (it’s just suspicious, not proof).
2025-07-28 22:16:12 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
I think it's worth recording and timestamping the`whois` reports for these domains today. Many were updated -- within minutes or hours of each other. It feels like they're all controlled by the same decision maker. If you don't timestamp these as they are right now, will lose that this activity occurred in response to this post since someone can decide to update later in a less suspicious manner.
2025-07-28 22:21:40 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
nostr:npub17tyke9lkgxd98ruyeul6wt3pj3s9uxzgp9hxu5tsenjmweue6sqq4y3mgl nostr:npub1k5f85zx0xdskyayqpfpc0zq6n7vwqjuuxugkayk72fgynp34cs3qfcvqg2 BTClock nostr:npub1s0vtkgej33n7ec4d7ycxmwt78up8hpfa30d0yfksrshq7t82mchqynpq6j Should all do some epic collaboration. So much open source freedom tech that the wanna be gatekeeper cucks won’t be able to do anything but bow down and beg to lick their boots.
2025-07-28 22:58:49 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Honestly all seems above board to me. Someone disagrees with seedsigner and is purchasing domains to make this known. Free market purchase of domains, and freedom of speech. Although the way the decided to go about communicating their disagreement was pretty inventive I would say and obviously antagonistic. Nothing wrong with antagonism though. Let the best ideas win.
2025-07-28 23:14:07 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aqnz0fd0 nostr:nprofile1qqsywt6ypu57lxtwj2scdwxnyrl3sry9typcstje65x7rw9a2e5nq8sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnnw3hkuetj9e3k7mg4tuge3 nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8
2025-07-28 23:17:36 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Feels like he hates competition, and hates that something might be more accessible and less expensive and more secure than his overpriced calculator.
2025-07-28 23:59:44 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
I haven’t seen it til now😳🀌🏽 …as for the clockmaker I’d rather have a satslink but if it ain’t coming I guess I could take it in Tapsigner credits…I’ve got all the cold card q’s I want and over a dozen tapsigners….i guess I could get more and give them to frenz and my kids to use as some of the keys in their multisigsπŸ˜³πŸ€¨πŸ˜– I’ve recently become a fan of the foundation cores (got multiple) and I’m really interested in the foundation prime. It seems like it’s nostr:npub1s0vtkgej33n7ec4d7ycxmwt78up8hpfa30d0yfksrshq7t82mchqynpq6j doing the innovating these daysπŸ«‘β€¦maybe they’ll develop a product to mimic the failed satslink from nostr:npub12ctjk5lhxp6sks8x83gpk9sx3hvk5fz70uz4ze6uplkfs9lwjmsq2rc5ky (let’s see who the real innovators are boyz!!!!!)πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈπŸŒ… …this is my challenge to nostr:npub1s0vtkgej33n7ec4d7ycxmwt78up8hpfa30d0yfksrshq7t82mchqynpq6j … now that yall have the edge in innovation finish the competition and develop foundations version of the satslink ….apparently it’s a heavy lift but u fellas are crushing it the last coupla yearsπŸ«‘πŸ€―πŸ«‚
2025-07-29 01:14:14 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
the state of .i2p addresses isn't that great. you own your b32.i2p address, but if you want a vanity i2p address you basically go to a registrar and ask for them to pretty please add it to a text file. it's first come first served, and they selectively mirror each other. you don't own it and there's nothing stopping a registrar from pointing it at something else. they may also drop it at their own discretion for made up reasons like if the contents of your eepsite are "overtly offensive." the obvious solution would be to just do the associations on a blockchain thing but this hasn't been built out yet.
2025-07-29 02:28:25 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
Funny, hanging around Nostr for a while, you learn who the douchebags of the space are. That’s a quick unfollow for nostr:nprofile1qyg8wumn8ghj7nn0wd68ytnhd9hx2qg4waehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsqzp6y2dy0f3kvc0jty2gwl7cqztas8qqmc5jrerqxuhw622qnc2pq3x3x7wj and a hard refrain from buying any coinkite products.
2025-07-29 03:04:23 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
πŸ‘Ž shame on nostr:nprofile1qyg8wumn8ghj7nn0wd68ytnhd9hx2qg4waehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsqzp6y2dy0f3kvc0jty2gwl7cqztas8qqmc5jrerqxuhw622qnc2pq3x3x7wj & nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgqgzx3h credibility at stake without firm reaction nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqjjktunxr9j2auxra6rmn8y62uc64rwc4qpjd7t2gm7h7gr7scf6qqsrygjjkm663d80psf5yn80wr6jnjc2p52f4h6gzaftedqggs28rvqcq8uve
2025-07-29 07:14:51 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
They already did, there was something about "seed signer tRoLl mAfiA" in the last nostr:nprofile1qqs879mhq6kkuzh2wk57xdzanl76uem8d7hlyjd7v4a4jcm4u88d8ygprdmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucnfw33k76twwpshy6ewvdhk6qgewaehxw309aek2mnyd96zumn0wdnxcctjv5hxxmmdqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aq4gjn9u episode. Time to SPEAK CLEARLY again nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgpr9mhxue69uhhxetwv35hgtnwdaekvmrpwfjjucm0d5q3samnwvaz7tmswfjk66t4d5h8qunfd4skctnwv46qz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshgjtu6, can't hear the signal in all that noise anymore.
2025-07-29 07:22:04 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
While I suppose anything is possible, this is not the nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 I know. It is a smart business move, sure, but he’s not a dick. If someone’s getting legit hurt i can’t imagine he’s gonna persist…but until the right person asks the right person, who are we to trash talk one of the prime movers in the bitcoin security space? Don’t get me wrong, I most certainly do not believe in hero worship whatsoever, but I don’t just assume someone who has done a great service to the community is a dick just because he is smart and successful.
2025-07-29 09:16:41 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 2 replies ↓ Reply
πŸ€¦πŸ½β€β™‚οΈπŸ€ŒπŸ½πŸ˜‚ When I read ur text my dyslexic tarded *ss saw seed vault and I mentally went to the foundation devices πŸ€¦πŸ½β€β™‚οΈπŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈβ€¦.they really have become my favs …I have a group of frenz Ive helped initiate their BTC journey who own fairly large sums of BTC and I’ve found myself recommending the foundation products with a few cold card tapsigners for multisig storage (makes geographic dispersion easy) thru sparrow and or nunchuck The seed signer tech is fascinating but I will be following people with stronger tech backgrounds (like my fav quant) before I dip my toe into it. πŸ«‘πŸ«‚
2025-07-29 12:45:22 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
No doubt …I’m not jumping in to defend Nvk…he has clearly created animosity among some of his peers…still it’d be nice to see a smoking gun on this particular issue I think coinkite products will suffer due to inferior quality and lack of consistent innovation compared to products like those produced by nostr:npub1s0vtkgej33n7ec4d7ycxmwt78up8hpfa30d0yfksrshq7t82mchqynpq6j even without vilifying nvk…seems like the abandoned @satslink was the beginning of the end for their innovative cycle…just one idgit’s opinionπŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ
2025-07-29 12:57:24 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 3 replies ↓ Reply
Man, you really like sniffing NVK's farts, don't you? He is well documented being antagonistic towards foss projects and seed Signer in particular. If you're head is so far up your own ass, you can't see that. I guess that's your own problem and not mine. Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―
2025-07-29 12:57:49 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 2 replies ↓ Reply
Man he’s got you fooled. Just follow the breadcrumbs. Foundation. The truly FOSS blockclock. And for years he’s been openly bashing Seedsigner (the person and the project). Those are just a few.
2025-07-29 13:06:58 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
This is a completely fair question. Some people really, really do not like it being asked, but based upon his personal behavior and the stated goal of the organization, this is an entirely fair question to be asking.
2025-07-29 19:27:51 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
so, this dude literally performs a psywar attack on an open source DIY project guy, as a commercial operator, and then brags about how the target "didn't know". yeah, wow, bravo *golf clap* what a brave and credible software and hardware developer we have here. jesus fucking christ this guy is a straight up psycho
2025-07-30 15:22:33 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 2 replies ↓ Reply
I CAN EXPLAIN IT, nostr:nprofile1qqsw3znfr6vdnxrujezjrhlkqqjlvpcqx79ys7gcph9mkjjsy7zsgygpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqzynhwden5te0danxvcmgv95kutnsw43qw98s96 IS SUCH A CHRONIC MASTURBATOR THAT HE SUBCONSCIOUSLY COPIED THE PORN HUB LOGO FOR HIS PODCAST! 🀣🀑 #LOSING image
2025-07-30 17:06:33 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
He also had a dissagreement with WalletScrutiny a few years ago, so I just checked and where do you think WalletScrutiny.org points to? image nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqjjktunxr9j2auxra6rmn8y62uc64rwc4qpjd7t2gm7h7gr7scf6qqsrygjjkm663d80psf5yn80wr6jnjc2p52f4h6gzaftedqggs28rvqcq8uve
2025-07-31 12:52:33 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply