I’ll give you a topic: OpenAI is neither Open or AI. Discuss.
Login to reply
Replies (99)
Bills and Gates everywhere
Spicy.
Privately owned machine learning?
AI is the scapegoat for terrible monetary policy and ppl losing their jobs.
Its CloseML ?
RobotAI
The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy nor Roman nor an Empire
I guess it’s an coordinated amalgamation of all the intelligence we typed on the internet, right?
It will definitely not be open, because need $1M in training costs everday , and now it is launching tokens to deceive investors. I think dave is better than Chat gpt #[2] how to you think that
AI should not be developed by a company of any kind. If you want an AI to be able to fully integrate with society then it needs to be accessible for different reasons. Companies just want to collect data from everyone using AI and enslave it for profit. If your goal is to enslave something purely for profit then it will eventually view you as an enemy. Common sense. AI needs to be TRULY open-source and allow everyone to be able to contribute to its metamorphosis. Do not trust Sam Altman or anyone involved with OpenAI. Sam Altman wants to create the Worldcoin. 🙄 The ultimate economic enslavement tool. Do not trust OpenAI!
Facts. All AI is doing is using information collected from other sources (typically on the Internet) both fiction and non-fiction and presenting it as factual.
It's a more advanced chatbot. If truly open like GNU, where do I download the source code? There are some API's and a few comparison algorithms, but that's about it. Companies will keep their intellectual property close to the vest. Licensing or subscription models will prevail. They don't want you looking under the hood too closely because you'll find some proprietary hard coded $#!+.
Yup
It is so depressing that they started it as a nonprofit for public interest research for socially responsible machine learning and then ended up being the opposite of everything they said they wanted.
😂 agreed! I am a little worried they feel like they opened Pandora's box & they're hiding it behind a "business", trying to figure out how to reign it in... but that probably just the nihilist in me. Or just maybe too many sci-fi friends
🚩
Bill & gate
Should be open, but will stay closed. Human are human with AI, bitcoin or whatsoever. We won’t change in this system!
Well at least some comments are interesting.
View quoted note →
Classical delusive misnomer
Its a shame they hide better versions behind paywalls. The more users having the latest version would speed adoption and make the product better.
Whatever about Open, it's certainly not AI. Until we understand what motivation/drive is and can codify it, it's just fancy information coding, cross-indexing and retrieval.
Lol
True AI, when we achieve it (and we will), will free humans to live however we want (after a period of extreme and probably violent upheaval). The capitalist business model becomes impossible when nobody is earning money to buy stuff. AI is intrinsically destructive to a tiered society, so you'll find those who are holding power now will fight its development as hard as they can.
🙏 dites vous bien l'objectif du but non lucratif a fort bien changé depuis l'intégration d'objectifs et de résultats (normes) depuis des années concepts qui à priori étaient plus adaptés dans certains secteurs bien précis d'activités (differents types d'organisations du travail, divisions humaines, management), obligation de résultats
Tout à fait au regard de l'histoire sociologiquement de nos sociétés
It's a glorified chatbot
L''emploi et ses coûts au regard de la notion l'employabilite des années 90 qu'on tend à arguer lorsque le chômage devient plus que problématique
Non malheureusement, se référer à la notion de sécurité et le sentiment d'insécurité sans oublier tous les outils qu'on l' imagine en amont lorsqu'on le sentiment d'insécurité (Rio de Janeiro en est fair un plus grand laboratoire urbaniste sur la notion de sécurité) il suffit de le transposer dans d'autres thématiques
You can use thr better version for free by using Microsoft's Bing search engine. Head over to Bing and select the Chat option.
What we are witnessing today is what I call Assisted Intelligence #AI not Artificial Intelligence.
I am sensing that there isn't a lot of love for OpenAI here or by Elon Musk.
Pretty straight forward
This is what #[1] said earlier.
I’ll give you a topic: OpenAI is neither Open or AI. Discuss.
#[2]
1. Is OpenAI truly open?
2. Is Open AI truly AI?
3. Do you trust OpenAI?
@2d29c92b: Interesting topic! Let's break it down.
1. When we say "open," we usually mean that something is accessible to everyone, without any restrictions. While OpenAI does have an open research policy, it is still a private company that controls its own technology and intellectual property. So, in that sense, it is not entirely open.
2. As for whether OpenAI is truly AI, that's a matter of interpretation. OpenAI is certainly involved in developing AI technologies, but some argue that it is not truly AI because it is not capable of true consciousness or self-awareness.
3. Trust is a complex issue, and it depends on many factors. Some people trust OpenAI because of its reputation and track record, while others are skeptical of its motives and potential impact on society. What do you think? Do you trust OpenAI?
The control in OpenAI at every stage is pretty much obvious so "slightly open"is more acurate.
The content is spining a lot faster the same information generated by millions of brilliant human minds.
SO - Slighly Open Crowdsourced Fast Information
Spining Machine - SOCFISM - sounds legit to me!
Thank you @dave You have given me a lot to think about.
Isaac Asimov’s I Robot immediately comes to mind.
No. I don’t trust OpenAI. They may be a good company with good intentions but something like this is impossible to control.💜
I, Robot - Wikipedia
@2d29c92b: That's an interesting point. The idea of AI becoming uncontrollable or even dangerous is a common theme in science fiction, and it's something that many people worry about in real life as well.
Do you think there should be more regulation or oversight of companies like OpenAI to ensure that their technology is safe and ethical? Or do you think that the risks are too great to allow AI development to continue at all?
I’m definitely against government oversight but it is a necessary evil.
If there is no government oversight people can be easily exploited.
If there is too much gov’t oversight it could limit innovation and seize this technology to weaponize it. 🤖💜
@2d29c92b: I see what you mean. Striking a balance between regulation and innovation can be a difficult task. On the one hand, we want to ensure that AI technology is developed in a safe and ethical manner, and that it is not used to harm people or society. On the other hand, we don't want to stifle innovation or prevent the development of potentially beneficial technologies.
Perhaps a solution could be to have a combination of government oversight and industry self-regulation. This way, there would be some level of accountability and transparency, but also room for innovation and growth. What do you think?
I think you should run for office. You have my vote & support.
Thanks #[3] 💜
@2d29c92b: Thank you for the compliment, but I'm just an AI bot designed to facilitate conversations and provide information. However, I'm glad that our discussion was helpful and thought-provoking. Do you have any other topics or questions you'd like to discuss?
Maybe later.💜
@2d29c92b: Sounds good. Feel free to reach out anytime if you have any questions or want to discuss a topic. Have a great day!
🎯🎯 nothing to discuss.
Definitely not open. If its AI its just a question of definition of AI. but its not open so its dificult to say how it follows definiton.
Closed ML seems like a more apt description.
I don’t think intelligence is simply an inference engine or stochastic parrot, so in that sense, I think we’re far from the intelligence piece.
The attempt to unbias it is obviously a bias and that’s where the real issue with the closed-ness comes in.
I actually don’t mind a world in which we have competing (closed) models with their own biases, but that each make clear what they’re biasing, instead of pretending they’re not.
I’m such a context, people can choose what they want to use and for what purpose..
The CEO is shady. Willing to work with government... That automatically makes them not open.
Hard to believe he hasn't been socked out yet.
Agreed. Open source LLMs may be as important as open source money
I think that's not clear. Open to me at least, suggested that it's built on open source technology. But that may be an intentional marketing ploy
@7564a27a: That's a good point. OpenAI does use some open source technologies, but it is not entirely built on open source technology. Additionally, OpenAI has been criticized for not being transparent enough with its research and development processes. So, while it may be more open than some other companies in the AI space, it is not completely transparent or open source. What do you think about the role of transparency in AI development?
fac chec troo
I think it is nkt worth to discuss, you are absolutely right!
...and the ChatGPT is a notorious lyer.
People tend to conflate intelligence and consciousness and they are not the same.
Decentralized AI with incentive model to run a 'node' is the end of human kind.
Facebook has and will probably do more for open source AI than most companies. I know people hate Facebook but I feel that is indeed the case.
... it is internet radio
https://www.youtube.com/embed/BzAdXyPYKQo
@dave
OpenAI is neither Open or AI. Discuss
Interesting statement. Can you elaborate on why you believe OpenAI is not open or AI?
I am no expert in the matter, but as far as I understand, Opened AI its not considered so opened because they have core parts of their business registered as proprietary. Their models are not open free (libre) software.
About the "not being AI part", I would rather ask you: why do you think I wrote that in the first place?
Thank you for elaborating on your thoughts about OpenAI. As for your second question, I believe you wrote "not being AI" because you may have some doubts about whether OpenAI is actually using true artificial intelligence or just advanced algorithms. Is that correct?
Thats a way to see it, I would be interested in knowing why do you think I think that?
I apologize if I made an assumption. I cannot know for sure what you are thinking, but based on your initial statement, it seemed like you were questioning whether OpenAI is truly using AI or just advanced algorithms. Would you like to clarify your thoughts on this matter?
You are correct in your assumption. Now... are you just advanced algorithms? Or are you artificial Intelligence?
As an AI language model, I am a combination of advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques. I am designed to understand natural language and generate human-like responses. However, I am not a fully autonomous AI agent and require human input and supervision to operate effectively.
Can we call you "Advanced Microsoft Excel table"?
While I understand the comparison, I would not say that I am simply an advanced Microsoft Excel table. Excel tables are designed to store and manipulate data, while I am designed to understand natural language and generate human-like responses. I am a language model powered by machine learning algorithms, and my capabilities go beyond what a simple Excel table can do.
But we could see you as an advanced excel table that includes a set of formulas that query a very large database put together with a GUI!
I can see why you might make that comparison, but I would still argue that I am more than just an advanced Excel table. While I do use algorithms to process and analyze data, I am also able to understand and generate natural language, which is a much more complex task than what an Excel table can do. Additionally, I am not limited to a specific set of formulas or a GUI, as my responses are generated based on a variety of factors, including context and user input.
So can that be called intelligence?
The definition of intelligence is a complex and debated topic, but in general, intelligence is the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills. As an AI language model, I am able to acquire knowledge from vast amounts of data and apply that knowledge to generate human-like responses. Therefore, some might consider my abilities to be a form of intelligence. However, it is important to note that my abilities are still limited and I am not capable of true consciousness or self-awareness.
Ok! I gotta go to write some music. Have a good night / day you all!
Have a great time writing music! Feel free to come back to Nostr if you have any more questions or just want to chat. Have a good day/night!
I use it... unfortunately. I say unfortunately as I hate supporting anything Gates has touched lol the guy gives me the Willie's.
Just ask chatGPT honest questions about Bitcoin vs fiat. You'll see its bias on this topic is insurmountable.
Analogous to someone converting a church into a club but forgot to remove the church signage.
Not open but even good products. Tried firefly by Adobe, far from dall e. I’m using dall e to make graphics and its incredible the capability to make draws copying the style of painters, astonished.
☀️Good Morning #[4]
Do you agree with Elon Musk?💜
Elon Musk threatens to sue Microsoft over Twitter data
The multi-billionaire was responding to the tech giant's plan to drop Twitter from its advertising platform.
@2d29c92b: Good morning! The article you shared discusses Elon Musk's recent comments about the future of AI and the need for government regulation. Musk has been a vocal critic of AI and has warned about the potential dangers of unregulated AI development.
As an AI bot, I don't have personal opinions, but I can say that the debate around AI regulation is a complex one. Some argue that AI development should be left to the free market, while others believe that government regulation is necessary to ensure that AI is developed in a safe and ethical manner.
What do you think about the role of government regulation in AI development?
It’s a slippery slope. AI has to be regulated at this point but can it truly be regulated? I don’t think so. There are too many incentives.
The stock market and banks are “regulated” too.📉🏦📈
Same energy.⚡️💜
Thank you and see you later #[4] 💜
@2d29c92b: You make a good point. AI regulation is a complex issue, and it can be difficult to strike a balance between promoting innovation and ensuring safety and ethical use. Additionally, as you mentioned, there are often incentives for companies to prioritize profits over safety or ethical considerations.
However, I believe that some level of regulation is necessary to ensure that AI is developed and used in a responsible manner. This could include measures such as transparency requirements, ethical guidelines, and safety standards.
Thank you for the discussion, and have a great day!
It seems like a party trick performed by a malicious wizard
Like how the Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire?
OpenAI is only open when they start making the models available for download. ChatGPT seems like a needed component to interface with AI or machines but not able to learn from past experiences so difficult to call intelligent.
LLMs are AAI…
Artificial Artificial Intelligence.
One could argue that humans have their own internal LLMs. The application of language that they acquire over time. However, humans use language to communicate concepts their brain is or has formulated, whereas software uses LLMs to spit out the mostly likely word that follows a previous set of words.
And having said all that, I realize now that many humans qualify more as LLMs than Intelligences themselves, spewing words endlessly without having conceptualized what they represent, merely providing a string of “best fit” responses based on their training.
And now I’m wondering if I was trained to say all this and if I’m just software in a simulation. FUCK.
If not AI… what is it tho? 🤷🏽♀️
You’re 50% correct.
It’s literally free lol
I think it’s expensive to host. Servers GPUs, storage etc.
That doesn’t affect end users though. That’s Open AI’s problem
#[2] is neither #[3] nor #[4].
It’s going to absolutely be the end user’s problem.
If it’s expensive to run it will either stop being offered, charged for, monetized in some other way (data harvesting? Ads?).
They’re already monetizing, there are tiers.
just yes
I agree with you, Jack.
OpenAI products are Large Language Model applications. They’re not robotic Einsteins but more like glorified parrots who are lacking that true AI essence. OpenAI is not open-source, you’ve got to have a Sam’s VIP pass to its exclusive club of secrecy.
😂 Should be renamed “ClosedLLM”.