Replies (102)
Well we all wanna change the world and that's cute
#AQSTR thank you sir for sharing some generational love into the future 🤝
Gracias por los sats, muy interesante 👍 este post
Thank you for sharing🙌🏽
Thank you for sharing🙌🏽
No I don’t think I will
Thanks for sharing ❤️ I love seeing this kind of content
Thanks for sharing ❤️ I love seeing this kind of content
Greetings, thanks for the assignments, guys.
Thanks a lot for the sats 🫶
Muchas gracias por los sats 💜
Hey guys, thanks for the homework
Block 961,632 is coming ...
Thank you so much for sharing 😊
Thank you so much for sharing, 😊 interesting
#AQSTR toxic maximalist ...pragmatism is better. Life is not either black or white. So be you.
#AQSTR captain jack era el nombre de una canción top de los 90. Lo reventaba en la radio. Otros tiempos.
Obrigado por compartilhar isto
Grato pelos sats enviados
Thanks for sharing and thanks for the sats
Strong statement! Where do you stand? The clock is ticking...
Thank you for sharing this content. Keep posting and thanks for the zap.
Dr. Jack is the man for that one!
#runbip110
#bitcoin
I'm more bullish on bitcoin now
TOXIC MAXIMALISM may sound negative
but yeah that's the only way
BRING BACK TOXIC MAXIMALISM 👍👍👍
BRING BACK TOXIC MAXIMALISM 👍👍👍
On my node, on August 5th, I will be running BIP110. And I STRONGLY suggest you do the same….
I would do this campaigne for free
Bueno la idea es justamente que la cadena no se llene de spam sobre todo imágenes por eso hay que ser muy responsable si escribes algo en la cadena.
Of course, it's a very valid argument.
Let's take a look at this!
Thank you for sharing your experience.
Thank you for sharing the content.
Thank you for sharing the content.
I think i need to study current Bitcoin implementation a little more, can explain?
#Aqstr Thanks for the satoshis
#Aqstr Thanks for the satoshis
Saylor for the win always.
If miners are the only thing that matters, why do we bother running full nodes? If a miner produces a block with invalid signatures, what keeps that block from being accepted by the rest of the network?
More importantly, If miners fill blocks with non-monetary data, are we still using Bitcoin as a monetary network, or just a decentralized data storage solution? At what percentage is arbitrary data okay? 60%, 80%? 99%?
Let's gooo Let's gooo Let's gooo Let's gooo
Let's gooo Let's gooo Let's gooo Let's gooo
Roadrunner running high on the network:
BIP BIP 110 !
Very nice thank you for sharing this with us👍
Very nice thank you for sharing this with us👍
It actually does address the rune problem. Runes protocol relies on embedding "Runestone" metadata within these outputs, capping them at 83 bytes renders the majority of Runes transactions (especially "etchings," which require more space) technically impossible to include in a valid block.
Also by limiting data pushes and witness elements to 256 bytes, the proposal prevents protocols from using alternative methods to "pack" their data across multiple pushes.
Finally BIP-110 consensus rules state that any transaction with a scriptPubKey exceeding 34 bytes is invalid unless it is an OP_RETURN (up to 83 bytes). Any attempt to use larger scripts or bypass these limits will cause a BIP-110-enabled node to reject the transaction outright.
So yes. Runes are fucked.
mempool.kilombino.com
BRING BACK TOXIC MAXIMALISM 🛸
thank you so much Dr. Jack
Viele mercy per your robota et thanks für les sats too!
Viele mercy per your robota et thanks für les sats too!
gracias por compartir sats
gracias por compartir sats
Tengo que usar más wavlake
Ok, thank You for this 🔥
He usado muy poco #wavlake.
Necesito probarlo más seguido.
Necesito usar más seguido #Wavlake 🧡
Valor por valor sin terceros.
Viva #Nostr y Viva #Bitcoin
will BIP110 have aggressive filters? will it lead to a fork?
will BIP110 have aggressive filters? will it lead to a fork?
TOXIC MAXIMALISM whwre where?
Because this shit is showing on Bitcoin and it cannot happen
Bip 110 is definitely the most rational thing to run. Everyone is free to choose it or reject and therein lies the beauty of #Btc
Nah, fuck BIP110 and also Core... Core V29 Maximalism is the way for me, even if I am alone on this.
Thank you very much for sharing this post.
Thank you very much for sharing this post.
thanks for sharing on the network with everyone
thanks for sharing on the network with everyone
lol core maximalism… you like getting you’re ip exposed and wallets deleted? 😅 what’s the benefit exactly?
BRING BACK TOXIC MAXIMALISM 🛸
I run a knots node but didn't want to signal for bip 110,
Sorry bub, I'm a monero maxie
Im sorry for your loss
bitcoin cannot be saved at this point. it's just going to slide into a quicksand pit of centralized L2s and paper bitcoin schemes. knots will not save you from this at all.
Do not be like the retarded below. Fuck knots and bip110.
lmao, cope and seethe harder
Because this shit is showing on Bitcoin and it cannot happen
Because this shit is showing on Bitcoin and it cannot happen
On my node, on August 5th, I will be running BIP110. And I STRONGLY suggest you do the same…. Because this shit is showing on Bitcoin and it cannot happen
On my node, on August 5th, I will be running BIP110. And I STRONGLY suggest you do the same
support content on nostr #aqstr
support content on nostr #aqstr
Ok friend thanks Bitcoiners
Excellent friend thanks 🥰🥰🥰
No hay que ser tan maximalistas pero si bitcoiners
Love to see it keep up the good work
Great track thank you for making it available
The implication at the end is bigger than the main point.
Da igual el nodo que corras, si no corres uno no aportas a la red
gm & pv thanks for sharing
We are never too toxic to be honest!))
I need to take a look on BIP110, I've seen a lot of discussions about it but i need to study more before giving my op
What would change your mind on this?
Toxic maximalism = anti bip110 and Dr Kruse has turned into a pathetic chud
being anti spam and anti centralization is the epitome of bitcoin maximalism. Thats bip110
He verifies all Bitcoin. I do too. With Bitcoin Knots and BIP 110
Voted with my node 🫡
I don’t get people who stay on Core 29. Don’t they realize that the same developers who made Core 30 possible also made all the previous versions, at least back to Core 25? They gradually degraded the software starting with v26. Core 30 was simply the final nail in the coffin of this “open-source” project. If you’re having issues with Core bc of v30, you should take issue with all of its recent predecessors.
![ꓘɨℓσꬺƄɨP110ꓘɳσ[Ŧƨ] 𓅦丰's avatar](https://image.nostr.build/23ee33cac87bf71b98e809e2d990cf0a04c5aa1af452383f8a845479e072d79f.gif)
