Login to reply
Replies (24)
Lies
So now if humans choose to date others AFTER leaving another relationship it isnβt considered love ?
Wrong π
This is some of the grossest mindset Iβve seen portrayed yet.
Accepting humans for who they are is far more loving than the false ideology of the swill that kid is pushing.
Or maybe heβs just young & one of those incels β¦ IDK π€·π»ββοΈ
nostr:nevent1qqsvu075nj87v64ktpakpurw52fj0nvxm2gck998wz2tkn927xmn6cqpzemhxue69uhhxetpwf3kstnwdaejuar0v3shjex7llc
Yes and no. The issue with this video is that the dude is making a blanket statement.
For some people, yes, what the dude is saying is absolutely true.
The fact that what the dude is saying is true for some people, however, does not necessarily mean that it is true for all people.
To make that suggestion is to be guilty of committing the "part-to-whole logical fallacy" aka "the fallacy of composition and division".
Just because the tires are made of rubber doesn't mean the whole car is made of rubber.
This guy is a psychology major. That doesn't indicate that his awareness of logical fallacies is anywhere near robust.
Why would governments or religions teach logical fallacies to the next generation?
It is not in hegemons interests to give their subjects the tools necessary to throw off the yoke of that hegemonic relationship.
Then explain me how on earth you can love someone, if Immediatly after a break up, you go into another connection?
A break up between 2 people that are in love, brings heartbreak, you don't just switch. If being in love, means making another part of self, and making sure they are ok and safe, how can you deliver that pain?
Love isn't attachment & attachment isn't love.
Many use the word Love without having ever felt Unconditional Love.
Love isn't found in a psychology textbook or a dating app.
One can Love another while walking away from a toxic relationship with them. A lack of attachment doesn't prove a lack of Love.
Understood. But walking away from a Toxic connection you don't go soon after into another. Trauma bond is not that easily dismantled. We need a pause to heal. The new person does not have to deal with unhraled uncouscious traits that come after the abuse.
I will give you an example involving my own relationship with my family.
My family does not see the me that I am today.
They see me as a series of snapshots they collected from moments long ago.
Surely you are a different person from the person you were just 5, 10, 15, or 20 years ago, as am I.
We are not static creatures in a state of arrested development.
I can easily imagine scenarios where two people believed they were legitimately in love years ago, however, as time passed and experience accumulated, the two people who were once in love drifted apart and their ability to commune with one another degraded as a result.
Then there's the ultimate issue which is that most people don't even understand love in the first place. Love, specifically unconditional, universal love, is necessary for activating the heart chakra. Practicing the Golden Rule is a great way to activate the heart, throat, and 3rd eye. Most people do not activate any higher chakras because most people do not understand the essence of the Golden Rule. I can say that because basically every major religious tradition on the planet has a variation of the Golden Rule which tells us 2 things:
1. It's important for spiritual evolution
2. People suck at it. If people were fantastic at abiding the Golden Rule, it would be unnecessarily redundant for every religion to be pushing it.
Agreed! I do understand that people can drift away, still have love for one another, but there is no more space for growth, together. Love remains, but transforms into platonic uncondicional love.
None of those tools are needed when the reading comprehension rates are so low in the #USA which is sad truth π«
He is quite literally using truth sandwiches to seek to spread his false narratives. Icky.
Recently been looking at the reading comprehension rates in #USA & trying to find the balance. WOOF πΆ was I shocked π€―
π± : outlook not so good
More than 60% of Americans cannot understand a complex argument written above an 8th-grade level.
Right...same idea...the slave owners are incentivized to prevent the slaves from leaving the plantation so why would the slave owners teach the slaves how to read, calculate, or reason well?
The literacy rate in my country is around 3% and dropped from 25% in the last 50y. All because until 74, we lived in a dictatorship. The same idea, the less knowledge, the less power to rebel.
Ima non-monogamous. Maybe thatβs the reason.
Yeah I don't think we share the same definition of love. The exclusive love that you're talking about feels more like attachment.
When you're no longer attached to someone, when you no longer need them to fill a void within, it is easy to let them go.
In most cases people jump from 1 attachment to the next. The other person doesn't complete them as much as they initially thought & so they hop to the next person seeking fulfillment.
True love can only be experienced when you yourself feel whole. When you don't need the other person to feel complete.
One of the hardest things was letting go my dream of achieving enlightenment once I became a father. I knew that I will always have attachment to them. I accepted it & loved them fully & unconditionally as best I could. I want them to experience the fullness of whatever purpose it is that they came here to fulfill. I know that they occasionally need to experience the pain & discomfort of their own decisions & actions. That ultimately their comfort is neither my concern or responsibilty.
I'm only just now starting to feel my attachment to them dissolving. The love is still there but my need for them to be a certain way is softening. I'm only now learning to love myself unconditionally.
Legit.
I want to experience being intimate, hence loving deeply and knowing all qualities and flaws of one person, in a romantic sence.
Goodness, Iβm so sorry to hear that. Truly. π«
Fuck. Shit. Jesus is right. πππ«
Genuinely, Iβm still coming to terms with basic reading comprehension in the #USA after my career spent trying to do best for #humanity under the circumstances
Sorry for levity. Itβs my cope π«
Maybe we do. I would love to grow with one person, not many, in a romantic sence. I know that many don't agree with this my own view. I don't see it as attachment cause I can love deeply while letting go.
I don't want to possess nor out it into a box, but I want to be simply free yet recΓprocal.
This: True love can only be experienced when you yourself feel whole. When you don't need the other person to feel complete.
And from my experiences even if you do love another person fully it doesnβt guarantee the relationship will last.
I am flawed. Yet perfect. Humans π Some are good with others and some arenβt. Accepted this & learned to be rather specific when going into a relationship.
Everything is a lesson. For me.
I have been alone all my life. And I am ok with it. Everything in my house, from floor, to smells to painting, even ekectricity, I dudcit, akone. My father call me a little "master" lol (asking, "how could you do it ?!) As a human, I would love to experience a romantic recΓprocal love, something I have never experienced. It's natural for me to want to experience it. I have love and experience love in many forms, and grateful I am. Except in a romantic sence.
You're never truly alone ever but I understand what you mean.
I've experienced the opposite. I met a girl at 17, left home & I've lived with her ever since.
The grass often appears greener on the other side. π«
Itβs totally natural and understandable to want to experience it.
Apologies for just now seeing this. π«
You could not know. It's ok. π π«π«π«
I love the one , "the grass is greener where you water it" π«π
So good. π π«