Starting in 5 minutes View quoted note →

Join us tomorrow, approximately 24 hours from now (12 noon US east coast time), as we continue studying "The Law of One” which is a series of 106 conversations that occurred from 1981-1984 between a physics professor & the entity known as Ra who had previously tried to spread the Law of One in ancient Egypt with mixed results. Last week, we covered: -The "Ambiguity" logical fallacy as covered on yourlogicalfallacyis.com, -The 2nd section of Chapter 5 (pages 132-138) from “A Wanderer's Handbook”, -The 2nd 1/2 of Session 103 of the Law of One, -Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. This week we plan to cover: -The "Anecdotal" logical fallacy as covered on yourlogicalfallacyis.com, -The 3rd & 4th sections of Chapter 5 (pages 139-144) from “A Wanderer's Handbook”, -Session 104 of the Law of One, -Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. Link to join the "Flight Club" study group Clubhouse:

Clubhouse

Flight Club

Flight Club is a study group created by Red Tail Hawk to study all religious and esoteric wisdom traditions seeking common ground, truth, and insig...

Link to RSVP for the upcoming study group session: https://www.clubhouse.com/invite/1djuDq0nZeNp80wYdewKWbvBBW0YcGAGlYE:xkcZzkSHFKEGrGjCHqiKYaGi_5UWfEKOlLCUbbJry-M

Nostradamus's quatrain prophecies have cyclical accuracy & refer to multiple events often separated by lots of time. Century VII-14 is, among other things, about my research. Will not elaborate now. Follow me, attend my study group sessions, & read my book when it's published. 🪶

For those interested in my explorations of the Kailedy Gospel, i'm getting closer to a conclusion regarding its authenticity as a 1st century Gospel text. I'm at the point where I'm growing increasingly convinced of two things: 1. The work is a 20th century fabrication. 2. Despite this, the work is a valid spiritual wisdom text. By finding a number of clues in the text, one can basically determine a window of time within which a hoax author would have had to have been active. Certain details could have been harvested from certain publications in 1910 and 1925 in particular, however, the first copies of the Kailedy were said to have been circulating within mystical/occult circles in Great Britain sometime in the 1920s or 1930s. Well I found a guy who was a member of such a mystical/occult society before most people graduate college. He was also fluent in multiple languages including English as a first language, French, Greek, Coptic, and, importantly due to the 1925 source, German. He died in the early 1930s so this fabrication was a masterpiece final effort before checking out. This person was a meticulous scholar and a legitimate spiritual master. While they might not have been Jesus of Nazareth, I'm not going to fault Thierry Henry or David Beckham for not being Lionel Messi. I can learn from Hall of Famers even if they aren't considered by many to be the greatest of all time (GOAT). So, I stand by my recommendation to read the Kailedy Gospel as it is an excellent source guide of spiritual wisdom while, at the same time, I realize that it is not what it was claimed to be. Speaking strictly philosophically, there is a non-zero probability that a Gospel written by a spiritual savant in the 20th century could very well be more profound, deep, historically accurate, and insightful than any gospels written before it. This is perhaps unlikely, but certainly not impossible, especially given that paranormal means like channeling, dreams, etc. can all offer paths of insight into the events surrounding the life, passion, death, and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. My full analysis of the Kailedy Gospel will be included in my book. It will serve as a bridge between the autobiographical chapters that lead off the book after any introductions, prefaces, etc., and the discussion of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Kolbrin Bible. Discussion of these subjects will allow me to lead into the subject of reincarnation and continue my normal presentation flow from there into pole flips (not pole reversals, pole flips...one is 180 degrees, the other 90), lost civilizations and land masses, and then decoding religions with science, language, and a perennialist approach to the various religious, cultural, occult, and esoteric wisdom traditions that exist. I'm constantly finding things that need to be incorporated into the manuscript though, so just because you've heard me on a podcast or 7 doesn't mean you've got all of what I have to offer. It's getting to the point where I've found so many dots that connect in consistent ways that I've begun to forget some of what I previously found and noted as significant. This work isn't planned to be as long as Atlas Shrugged but it's not going to be anywhere as brief as The Communist Manifesto either. My guess is that before all is said and done, this thing gets close to 400 pages. I might try to make it be 420 pages just because. 🪶

I just learned the word "Purushim" and I feel like Mack in Agents of SHIELD when he finally got his shotgun-axe. It's the Hebrew term that points at the group known from the Bible as the Pharisees. It means "those who set themselves apart" or "the separated ones". Basically, as a concept, it encapsulates divisive dogmatism which is antithetical to the Golden Rule found in every religious tradition. To the modern, exoteric, mainstream Christians who hold yourselves above all others, know that you are modern Pharisees. That was the pride. This is the fall. Perhaps the most ironic thing is that you cheerlead a heavily distorted, censored, gatekept version of what was the greatest perennialist philosophy in known history. Christ originally travelled during the missing years of the "canonical" (fiat) Gospels. There are plenty of sources that point to the narrative that Christ travelled to Egypt, England, and along the Silk Road as far as Tibet, Nepal, India, and Persia, learning the words and ways of the great religious institutions found in those places. He walked the walk. He didn't just talk the talk. There's a reason modern, exoteric, mainstream Christians and Muslims do not understand passages like Matthew 10:16 or Genesis 3. It's because they're restricted by self-imposed boundaries. It's because they're fear-controlled, not love-driven. So, dogmatists who claim to revere Christ, prepare for internal struggle because you are modern day Purushim. You set yourselves apart as separated ones yet you fail to understand your most important rule: the Golden Rule. The flock has lost it's way but the return of the Prodigal Sons and Daughters is cause for celebration. Do the Hokey Pokey and turn yourselves around. That's what it's all about. 🪶

Join us tomorrow, approximately 22 hours from now (12 noon US east coast time), as we continue studying "The Law of One” which is a series of 106 conversations that occurred from 1981-1984 between a physics professor & the entity known as Ra who had previously tried to spread the Law of One in ancient Egypt with mixed results. Last week, we covered: -The "Burden of Proof" logical fallacy as covered on yourlogicalfallacyis.com, -The 2nd half of the 1st section of Chapter 5 (pages 127-131) from “A Wanderer's Handbook”, -The 1st 1/2 of Session 103 of the Law of One, -Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. This week we plan to cover: -The "Ambiguity" logical fallacy as covered on yourlogicalfallacyis.com, -The 2nd section of Chapter 5 (pages 132-138) from “A Wanderer's Handbook”, -The 2nd 1/2 of Session 103 of the Law of One, -Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. Link to join the "Flight Club" study group Clubhouse:

Clubhouse

Flight Club

Flight Club is a study group created by Red Tail Hawk to study all religious and esoteric wisdom traditions seeking common ground, truth, and insig...

Link to RSVP for the upcoming study group session: https://www.clubhouse.com/invite/o7LHNb6awY3ZkO49wlqyRQl5ze0AFRBRlqV:CDTZBQNndOnkTllsIsGV7Dkw12wFqgBtVO--QvkuKXk

I have a torch in the darkness. So do you. Should we argue about whose torch illuminates more darkness or should we put our torches together, producing light greater than either individual torch could produce by itself? What does that mean, to “put our torches together”? It means I study that source of light which you carry and you study the source of light that I carry, not as heresy hunters focused on seeking out differences, but rather as humble, curious, loving people seeking common ground. 🪶

Marketing line for my book when it is released: “Dogma is just a translation error” 🪶

Common experiences during Mercury retrogrades include technical glitches, communication breakdowns, and travel delays. This looks like both a communication breakdown and a travel delay, technically speaking. Things I never would have thought or said 5 years ago... View quoted note →

The discovery of what appears to be an ancestral relationship between the Kolbrin Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls continues to yield fascinating new rabbit holes to explore. The British Israel hypothesis is proving itself to have some real chops. Two of the Vatican's most well regarded historians using at least one source that is publicly available and at least one source from the Vatican's private library have affirmed the story that Joseph of Arimathea and a bunch of early disciples got Shanghaied on an oarless, sailless boat around 36 AD and wound up landing in Marseilles before distributing throughout Gaul as the first class of missionaries. Joseph of Arimathea continued on with some of the disciples to Britain where he linked up with the Druids who it seems understood the genetic logical fallacy quite well according to the Kailedy Gospel's early pages. I just started reading the Kailedy Gospel yesterday and have already found it to be very interesting. It purports to be one of the earliest Christian Gospels. Perhaps most interesting is that, in the Kailedy Gospel, John the Baptist talks about how "One comes who will be the promised Instructor of Goodness". Students of the Dead Sea Scrolls might see "Instructor of Goodness" and think to themselves...huh...that sure resembles the Essene notion of the "Teacher of Righteousness" found in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Students of Dolores Cannon's work "Jesus and the Essenes" would further recognize that John would be speaking Essene concepts because John and Jesus were both educated as children with the Essenes. There's a very reasonable chance that Elizabeth fled to Qumran with John and took shelter there from Herod's search as John learned alongside his cousin. Scholars, in my opinion, have prematurely dismissed both the Kolbrin Bible and the Kailedy Gospel as 20th century, "new age", fabrications. The provenance for both the Kailedy Gospel and the Kolbrin Bible are spotty records with large gaps or lacunas. Those gaps don't mean they're illegitimate, but they do introduce attack vectors for those who speculate that the Kailedy Gospel is not authentic as a first century gospel record. Note, I only learned about the Kailedy Gospel this summer so this is a new thing for me and I'm not some lifelong Culdian or British Israel hypothesis apologist. Some of the earliest known physical copies of the Kailedy (and Kolbrin) were said to have been handwritten copies circulating in Britain in the 1920s or 1930s. Post WW2 it seems the handwritten copies were transcribed into typewritten copies for preservation. There is a clear consilience forming here, but the question is why? There are only 3 possibilities as to how the Kailedy Gospel contains such a potentially significant textual overlap with the Dead Sea Scrolls. 1. Dumb luck 2. The Kailedy Gospel is legit 3. The fabricators of the Kailedy Gospel somehow learned about the Essene's "Teacher of Righteousness" prophecy and baked in a synonymous concept into their fabrication. Furthermore, they somehow connected the dots that John was educated as a child with the Essenes. In order for #3 to be the case, the reports of the Kailedy and Kolbrin hand written copies from the 1920s and 1930s could be difficult to explain, as the Dead Sea Scrolls weren't found util 1947-1956. After the influx of scrolls and fragments found in Cave 4, Father de Vaux implemented a secrecy rule, restricting access to the scrolls to a select group of scholars who would be working on analyzing and editing them. So, again, if #3 is the real timeline, we have to explain how there are copies of the Kolbrin and Kailedy circulating before the Dead Sea Scrolls were found and how the Kailedy contains the "Teacher of Righteousness/Instructor of Goodness" prophecy. The only way I can see that this "new age fabrication" hypothesis works is if the fabricators used the Damascus Document, but that doesn't even explain everything. The Damascus Document was found in 1896 and eventually published in 1910. That document explicitly contains the "Teacher of Righteousness" bit. So, there is a brief window from either 1910 to the 1920s, or, a larger window from 1896 to the 1920s but it applies to a much smaller subset of the population, i.e. friends of Solomon Schechter who were aware of, privy to, and involved in his work on the Damascus Document. It should be noted that the Damascus Document was found in Old Cairo which, again, makes sense given the Sons of Fire (Kolbrin) -> Sons of Light(Essenes) connection and the known Egyptian connection with the Hebrew tradition, i.e. Moses and Exodus. So, I guess the point here is that I've found a textual overlap that identifies the window of time within which the textual overlap could have been dishonestly and inauthentically transplanted from the Damascus document to the proposed fabrication. According to Josephus, the Essenes had a habit of adopting and raising children from external families. We know that John's father was murdered and Elizabeth was relatively elderly, making raising a child on her own in an adversarial climate difficult without support. Qumran is sufficiently distant from Roman authorities as to remain under Herod's radar. Qumran is the most logical support community she would have found that qualifies as "wilderness". If Elizabeth and Mary were sisters, and Joseph of Arimathea is Mary's uncle (Talmud), then Joseph was also Elizabeth's uncle. If Joseph was an Essene, it makes sense that Elizabeth would have known about Qumran and would have gone there. The wilderness in the Kailedy is described as "the wilderness of Shaba". I'm hearing Walter from The Big Lebowski saying that he doesn't roll on Shomer Shabbos, related to Shabbat and Sabbath, which, based on the Dead Sea Scrolls Sabbath content, could be the match. I'm kind of thinking that John's father was telling John's mother, Elizabeth, to take John out to the "satellite community" (wilderness) of the guardians of the Sabbath (Shaba), or, in other words, the Essene community at Qumran. I'm not aware of anyone but Dolores Cannon who suggests that John was educated by the Essenes and her first past life regression hypnosis patient was in 1968. The patient she worked with in order to acquire the content that led to her book "Jesus and the Essenes" wasn't even born until 1960. So, again, I'm not sure how all these details keep aligning if these stories aren't true. 🪶

I've been on the record for years now, saying that Rome, after hijacking Judaism and Christianity, took advantage by redirecting these religious movements away from the doctrine of reincarnation because people who believe in reincarnation would have been much more of a problem for the hegemony than those who believe you only live once (YOLO). As I've been studying George Jowett's "The Lost Drama of the Disciples", I learned that Julius Caesar may have affirmed my exact position, although, it seems that Jowett took some liberties in translating Caesar's words in order to suit his own beliefs. Jowett said "Julius Caesar wrote, circa 54 B.C.: 'They make the immortality of the soul the basis of all their teaching, holding it to be the principal incentive and reason for virtuous life. Believing in the immortality of the soul they were careless of death.'" I decided to double check Jowett and looked up Caesar's words. It seems that Jowett cherrypicked his translation to avoid admitting that the doctrine of reincarnation was a belief of the Druids. This did not accord with his own YOLO beliefs which he simply did not realize were inconsistent with paleoChristian teachings. Like many modern Christians, Jowett chose to engage in utterly ridiculous mental gymnastics to circumvent the admission of the validity of reincarnation that Jesus offered in Matthew 11:13-14 which reads "For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John. And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come." Here is Caesar's real quote: "The cardinal doctrine which they seek to teach is that souls do not die, but after death pass from one to another; and this belief, as the fear of death is thereby cast aside, they hold to be the greatest incentive to valour." -Julius Caesar, Commentaries on the Gallic War Note, when I say "real quote" here, I'm pointing out that basically every translation of Caesar's words incorporates the idea that the Druids believed that souls pass from one body to the next which, very clearly, is reincarnation. Jowett simply left that part out as it didn't validate his own distorted understandings. Yet again, it seems the perspective my research has distilled has proven itself poignantly accurate and, again, I will say that, either the perspective that I've distilled in my research is, relatively speaking, highly undistorted, OR, I have the worst case of confirmation bias I could imagine. As usual, one ought not to throw away the baby with the bathwater. Jowett has been a very valuable resource. I won't say that I agree with his every thought, but he is definitely a useful contributor of information. 🪶

Looks like I was onto something with this, but I jumped the gun and needed to follow the trail a bit further. It's not the first time that's happened. The Magi/Medjay connection was a similar experience for me as my "Time is Bitcoin" article from late 2023 shows. That said, here's the correction and update: It seems that the tradition of wearing a white wedding dress arose from Queen Victoria's wedding dress in 1840. That said, we also know that English royalty are highly positioned not only exoterically in broad society; they are highly positioned in occult circles and secret societies. As such, they would have been well informed on the idea that vestal virgins, priestesses of Hestia and Apollo, the Delphi oracle, paleoChristian nuns who'd taken a vow of perpetual virginity, and those who had earned the prestigious title of "God's Wife of Amun". The pre-classical Delphi Oracle existed ~3400 years ago. During this era, the priestesses wore undyed, naturally white linen or wool to represent their ritual cleanliness. Herodotus reports that Egyptian priestesses were strictly banned from wearing colors or animal fabrics like wool. They could only wear pure, bleached, white flax linen. Minoan priestesses from Crete wore a "heanos", a base underdress or tunic, during rituals, made of white linen. This corresponds with the generally Mediterranean rule that approaching the altar required shedding dyed, polluted, everyday clothing. None of these data points have dissuaded me that the origin of this tradition of wearing white to signal one's purity, chastity, virginity, or innocence began in Egypt, nor have any of these data points dissuaded me that the white garment was originally pointing at the enlightened aura. I still maintain that at some point, this esoteric understanding leaked to the exoteric world who misunderstood the expression but still attempted to emulate it. 🪶 View quoted note →

TL:DR; I think I just figured out that the tradition of wearing a white wedding dress is a distortion of a description of the enlightened aura. #TouchPaper Details: So, I was just finishing up my analysis of the words that start with "ānkh-" including ānkh itself. As I was preparing for the recently recorded but not yet released episode 4 of the Bitcoin Consciousness podcast's Red Tail Hawk series in which I cover and we discuss lost civilizations, particularly Mu, I wanted to include an analysis of the many "Mu-/mu-" words that were in that dictionary and distill some patterns which proved out to have been fruitful given what it yielded (primary meanings: water, mother, cease to exist). In that exploration, I noted a word "mu nu ānkhamu" which was defined as "a solution of ānkham flowers". Obviously the presence of ānkh in that got my attention. At that point, I looked up ānkh and saw a number of entries for ānkh as well as a number of words that all started with "ānkh-". In that section, I found ānkham which was a "a flower used in funeral wreaths". Looking it up online yielded that the ānkham flower was pointing at the Egyptian blue lotus. At this point I must have accessed a message @Henry sent me a while ago about how he'd heard before that the ancient Egyptians were consuming blue lotus somehow. I also remembered a quote from Uncle iIroh from Avatar, the Last Airbender, who declared a particular cup of tea "nothing more than hot leaf juice!" So, I figured, maybe the Egyptians were making a tea out of these Egyptian blue lotus petals. That would satisfy the "solution" concept in mu nu ānkhamu. So I looked it up and yeah, Egyptian blue lotus tea was/is a thing and it produces some very relaxing states. Pretty much all of the reported effects of consuming Egyptian blue lotus tea are consistent with theta dominant neural oscillation pattern states of consciousness. Apparently no scientific testing has been done to verify that this tea produces these neural oscillations, but it seems like we probably already know how that study will go. The usage of ānkham flowers in "funeral wreaths" more likely designates their association with Da'ath, the activation of the throat chakra. It's association with any higher, dormant chakra activation is the main point to distill from this. E. A. Wallis Budge, the author of the dictionary, likely was not esoterically informed on Kabbalah's teachings or on Da'ath, and, as such, the symbols that were used to designate "Da'ath", were conflated to mean physical "death". This echoes the strange phonetic similarity between Merkabah and macabre as well. These are mistranslations based on esoteric ignorance. While studying the ānkh words, I noticed that the 6th entry reads: "repeating life", a formula used sometimes in the place of maā-kheru In that word, I noticed "heru" which is the Egyptian spelling of Horus and also means "hawk". It's also a Chi Rho word. The k on the front actually doesn't affect the pronunciation much. The same phonetic similarities that allow us to bridge between "kigh", "kee", "chigh", or "chee" to hero, Hera, Heracles, Eros, etc. are in play here too. It's just a phlegmy H as opposed to an aspirated H. Those probably aren't official linguist terms but I have them written down somewhere in the manuscript. So I looked up maā-kheru and found 2 entries, one of which had a primary definition plus 5 alternative definitions. In all 7 definitions, the theme always was "innocence". The primary definitions of interest to this group are: 1.[to be declared to be] "true of voice, or word" in the Judgement, i.e., to be innocent, to be justified like Osiris; maā-kheru (fem. maāt-kheru) ALWAYS follows the names of the DEAD, it being assumed that they have been declared innocent, as was Osiris; 2. a crown of innocence, a garland of triumph Based on these definitions, it seems clear that the term "innocent" was pointing at the enlightened aura which, based on what we read today in "A Wanderer's Handbook" in which a selected quote from The Law of One was read (38.5), and based on Dead Sea Scroll 4Q405 23, ii, the enlightened aura is like a garment, something worn, and, in addition to having all 7 colors of the rainbow radiating iridescently, there is also a whiteness to it. Looking at modern traditions, in what circumstance is a white garment worn in order to symbolize the innocence, the purity, of the wearer? Wedding dresses. How do weddings tie in here? Well, activation of all of the higher dormant chakras is described as the reunification of the Divine Feminine with the Divine Masculine. Yoga means union. The "unio mystica" is a term from mystical Judaism pointing at the same thing. The phrase "hieros gamos" basically means holy union. The Rosicrucian book "The Alchymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz" directly invokes the word "wedding". It seems that there is a very real possibility that the concept of the "white wedding dress" was an expression of the enlightened aura, but was misunderstood exoterically by people, eventually becoming the tradition we have today of wearing a white wedding dress to signify virginity, i.e. innocence. 🪶

Starting in 5 minutes View quoted note →

Join us tomorrow, approximately 22 hours from now (12 noon US east coast time), as we continue studying "The Law of One” which is a series of 106 conversations that occurred from 1981-1984 between a physics professor & the entity known as Ra who had previously tried to spread the Law of One in ancient Egypt with mixed results. Last week, we covered: -The "Loaded Question" logical fallacy as covered on yourlogicalfallacyis.com, -The 1st half of the 1st section of Chapter 5 (pages 121-126) from “A Wanderer's Handbook”, -Session 102 of the Law of One, -Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. This week we plan to cover: -The "Burden of Proof" logical fallacy as covered on yourlogicalfallacyis.com, -The 2nd half of the 1st section of Chapter 5 (pages 127-131) from “A Wanderer's Handbook”, -Session 103 of the Law of One, -Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion. Link to join the "Flight Club" study group Clubhouse:

Clubhouse

Flight Club

Flight Club is a study group created by Red Tail Hawk to study all religious and esoteric wisdom traditions seeking common ground, truth, and insig...

Link to RSVP for the upcoming study group session: https://www.clubhouse.com/invite/N17IDW42OowG4AXrgw32aKLQwLolUNpN9VJ:lu9SZhVajP627RiFKVCNFSiPj15HDNWd6pWXECKYsqI

One of these is Teth. The other is entry 19 from section IX of “A List of Hieroglyphic Characters.” of E. A. Wallis Budge’s Egyptian Hieroglyphic Dictionary, entitled “Amphibia(Reptiles)”. Most people probably would struggle to tell them apart given how similar they are. The translation of the Egyptian symbol is “goddess”. I think this is pointing at Kundalini Shakti which, mind you, is awfully phonetically consonant with the first half of Shekinah. If: the Earth/Malkuth/root chakra is where Kundalini Shakti typically resides coiled up, Kundalini Shakti, as a concept, points at the Divine Feminine component of our spirit body’s anatomy, Shekinah is grammatically feminine, and is said to be the divine presence of God on Earth, Then: I see Shekinah as pointing at the same thing Shakti is, same as Teth, same as Ba, same as Omega upside down, same as u (In this same dictionary, u=serpent, amongst other definitions/meanings/concept values), same as “s”, same as that Egyptian looking serpent hieroglyph depicted. Note, just a few entries later, another serpent hieroglyph is assigned a phonetic value of “tch”. We know Teth is essentially equivalent to the English letter T in sound, so this further confirms the match. #TouchPaper 🪶

1 Coronthians 12:1-11 is about siddhis. Siddhis are spiritual gifts, often clairabilities, e.g. clairvoyance, clairaudience, claircognizance, clairsentience, etc. Discerning spirits is probably magnetoreceptive vision which supports my speculation that magnetoreceptive vision can be a siddhi, not just the result of ergot or LSD trips. I find this notable given that my abilities in interpreting multiple languages, including parts of Arabic, Hebrew, Greek, Coptic(Egyptian), Chinese, Sanskrit, and Native American languages, have ramped up considerably in the last few years, as has the word of knowledge been going brrrrrrrrr. #TouchPaper 🪶

Real View quoted note →