Replies (32)

Jason High's avatar
Jason High 2 months ago
From the side it looks pretty close to the original but the back is quite different.
AK πŸ‘ΈπŸ»'s avatar
AK πŸ‘ΈπŸ» _@thenobody.club 2 months ago
I think there are still cars that are bare minimum. Like commercial vehicles used for delivery or 3rd world country bad models. If you’re in America, I don’t think those minimums are up to standards so they wouldn’t be available there. I think you’re better off with an old but well maintained car from the early 90s and older.
Sleventy3's avatar
Sleventy3 sleventy3@zaps.lol 2 months ago
Currently driving a 2002 chev Silverado. Happy with my Harri (yes I name my vehicles πŸ€™) But I'd really like a second one with no trackers. Maybe a 5 speed like my old 99 Hyundai Accesnt. But a hatchback for extra room.
casey's avatar
casey 2 months ago
Definitely needs different tires, but I’m willing to give it some time to grow on me. I don’t immediately hate it.
1 replies ↓
Default avatar
npub1wxzf...lpqk 2 months ago
Not a fan of stock but once people start customizing it could look sick. Lifted, big wheels, etc
elsat's avatar
elsat elsat@habla.news 2 months ago
It's not so much about this particular model, or make. It's about ALL "modern" "new" vehicles looking the same. If you removed the logo from the front, and name on the back I would have no idea which car is made by whom, as they all look the same. Compare & contrast with some of the decades old iconic designs you or others share here. I wonder if the regulatory gulag is causing the convergence of monoculture design.
↑