Spammers arenβt sending their best π₯±
Login to reply
Replies (26)
Spammers π₯±
their sending arenβt best
their sending arenβt best
lol, 2000 dunbar number...
doesn't even have what should be the minimum option of 130
i bet you get a lot better quality without people who are pointlessly following more than that
Wish all clients had this
This is fantastic. Well done πͺ
What spam
Nostur ftw π
View quoted note β
View quoted note β
Can I ask, whatβs the reasoning for having a tab opening for every post or item we select? And is there a way to close all tabs at once? Iβd love not having to close them one by one since they accumulate really fast.
It should only open a new tab for every post you open from the main feed, in a tab it should navigate inside the tab but there is a bug that will keep opening a new tab, this is fixed in TestFlight, will be in App Store soon.
Exactly π
![[Redacted]'s avatar](https://i.nostr.build/tY4jXJYaDhmNcqRc.jpg)
That Dunbar number setting is pretty cool
@Fabian if I have over 2,000 follows in my contact list do my replies appear as spam?
My assumption is that your followers would not be included in my WoT unless others I follow (with less that 2000 followers) have the same followers.
With the current spate of spam bots (all with 0 followers) perhaps those should be considered low quality?
Actually I take that back - a lot of the bots are following each other π
I have the same question. In my case, I have less than 2000 followers.
is this in a new release? how is @Nostur determining spam?
What is the spam to useful ratio of each relay?
Yeah but why should it open a new tab for every post you open (touch/click) from the main feed??
lets go, nostur is awesome πͺπΌ
The number of people you follow won't affect whether your replies are seen as spam. Your follow list is only used to help decide if other people might be spammers.
For example, because I follow you, the people you follow are generally considered not spam. However, if you follow a huge number of people (the Dunbar threshold), then your follow list is no longer consider useful for this purpose.
this is correct
I don't have that info for each relay, I should probably add that
the basic web of trust filter existed like forever, the dunbar threshold was added I think about year ago, the stat that shows how much was actually blocked I added yesterday, will be on TestFlight soon
yea, the "spam filtered" counter is what i was wondering about. thought maybe my web was already free of spam
Interesting. Maybe the name Dunbar can be replaced by a term which doesn't require insider knowledge?
And can also set the depth of the web of Trust? Like 1, 2, 3 levels?
Hmm maybe the Dunbar setting can be name related to the width (per follow) to be taken of the follow graph , and the depth is as explained above?
Probably you won't read my message because I'm not on your follow list. You could add a feature that you also accept people who has zapped you above a certain threshold, this would mean they have something so important to say that they are willing to pay you to listen:)
Actually, not your followers but the people you follow.
The people you follow would not be included in my WoT unless others I follow (with less than 2000 follows in their contact list) also have those follows in their contact list.