The cast iron vs stainless steel pan debate is dumb.
Titanium is the new hotness.
Login to reply
Replies (34)
Why?
ππ€ legitness
A personal chef trumps all
Now Iβm questioning my choices
I've found a uranium pan gives a superior crust on the ribeye...
quartz ftw
Deep into grill season and IDGAF about pans, but that does sound cool.
Now youβre just making shit up
Nah, who paid you to say this?
Aluminium ftw
meat on a stick over an open flame is the way!
How have we not moved from tungsten cubes to tungsten pans yet?
Not in the SHSS category
Ceramic (Ballarini from Italy)
SHSS?
Stay Humble, Stack Sats!
Anything that can't go into dishwasher is garbage. Time is the most valuable thing.
is that debate still going on where?
Ah, I should have known. I'm useless at acronyms. I was never on Twatter so I never needed to abbreviate
I'm legit interested
I vote for magnesium. It's light and in a pinch, you can cook by directly lighting your pan.
where do copper pans sit in this argument?
I prefer vibranium
Copper is very good, but generally because of cost, they are thin and do not have as much thermal mass as cast iron or stainless. Due to cost, they are not something you want to abuse like you can with iron products.
π noted
I'll never give up on cast iron
Iβm digging the carbon steel, treat it like cast iron but lighter.
Which ones? I looked but reviews for most seem a bit shit.
This is the way!
aircraft-grade π
With the crackle of glowing charcoal underneath, I care little about the metal that the steak rests on.
agree
I defend stainless still for who is starting cooking and casting iron for who already have experience with pans. as a advocate of stainless I defend titanium too
Always been a secret ceramic maxi