Replies (15)

4's avatar
4 1 year ago
Are you (and other people) trolling over this or are people generally agreeing the evidence is strong that Peter is Satoshi?
I loved how he implied this must have been Peter accidentally revealing himself while clarifying his own earlier satoshi post. I read it more as just the pedantic response of a smart-ass.
btw, if you extend the satoshi post just a little further: "... and the transaction fee is higher", it makes Peter's response just seem even more redundant. I wonder why they chose to clip it at the "..." like they did. 🤔
Yep, completely unnecessary and borderline meaningless clarification from someone just trying to shake what their mama gave em and make some noise