Replies (43)
I also saw somewhere his mom tried to admit him to some psych ward or something because she was worried and that it didn’t happen and he wasn’t admitted. That was a huge fuck up too.
There’s almost always incredible signs.
Funny how everyone is completely safe in Singapore. It's because they go hard in the paint on violent crime. It's not rocket science.
Fuck virtue signalling midwits.
Mercy without justice isn’t compassion, it’s sabotage. If a man can terrorize others with a weapon and then stroll back out on the street, the state isn’t governing, it’s accessorizing the crime.
Exactly
White Libtards are the problem.
Truly
it only would take common sense
The legislative apparatus that enables this F’d up negligence, propped up by lobbyists who profit from institutional paralysis perpetuates a deliberate cycle of systemic failure.
You, like so many people educated in the West, are blind to the bonds of ethnic solidarity that bind non-White ethnic groups. I was too.
Add a racial filter to your processor if you haven’t already.
If not for your brand, for your children who will inherit this world.
Anyone who threatens with a gun and robs people deserves no mercy. The law must hit them to the fullest. Letting them out after such a serious crime is a betrayal of the people and public safety.
Civilization requires a spine. If you stick a gun in someone’s face, you forfeit your claim to comfort and leniency. Prison isn’t a “maybe,” it’s the bare minimum.
View quoted note →A necessary consequence of what I’m advocating is that it will disproportionately affect certain racial groups and yet it’s still what needs to be done. No more soft on crime “he had a bad childhood and mental issues” bullshit. If you’re a victim of childhood trauma you have my sympathy right up until you go from victim to victimizer and then we need to lock you up or execute you and be done with it.
careful holdl, the nostr liberals will delete your npub
Violent offenders have shown that they are threat. letting them out early puts everyone at risk. Rehabilitation can be used for non-violent crimes but for serious violence deserves strict accountability.
Safety first
They already put some sort of censorship label on me lol fuck them
This is the way 🤝
As future president, will you bring back public executions for instances such as this?
True. And the harsh reality — they simply don’t care.
Any person who commits a violet crime should be locked up for life. If aren't able to live in society without hurting people, you shouldn't be able to live in it
💯
1000%
Yeah. Violent criminals need to be physically restricted from being able to do more violent crimes until they are able to be rehabilitated, if even possible. It’s a matter of public personal safety
Even more true
Follow me if you see this please! New to Nostr and don't want it to feel lonely like it does now
I like just encouraging gun ownership and shooting criminals
Most of them die or run away
Seems to work well here in Florida, very safe
You have my vote 🫡
It’s not possible to rehabilitate them.
Then what do you suppose we do?
I said above. Life imprisonment or execution.
Yet another retarded glowie post by HODL
Allow people to defend themselves as well, level the playing field. You’re not going to see these cowards mess around with armed targets.
Public hangings for murder and other abhorrent crimes when you can prove beyond reasonable doubt.
🤝🏼
Maybe post an introduction?
Nostr is a tool not some algorithm to appease you or anyone. GL and welcome to the freest place I’ve ever been.
Ah okay
This haunts me. I have a daughter about the same age.
forfeit
That video is absolutely insane in so many ways.
13%
I bet yous a 13 percenter
don’t know much about the incident, but let me guess, it happened in a gun-free zone?
Wtf is that
Absolutely, why advocate for better laws when you can just kill everyone and remove the need for laws in the first place?
Great points.
