I'LL PAY 21K SATS TO THE BEST ANSWER: How do commercial banks “create money”? Is it money? Why is it inmoral? Why don't most people understand it? You must share this post to be eligible for the reward. Responses are valid from now until 24 hours from now.

Replies (28)

When a commercial bank issues a loan, it doesn’t lend out existing deposits. It types the loan amount into the borrower’s account, creating a new asset (the loan) and a new liability (the deposit) at the same time. The Bank of England confirmed this in its 2014 paper Money creation in the modern economy. Around 97% of money in circulation is created this way by private banks. Functionally it spends like money, but technically it’s a claim on the bank rather than base money, which is why bank runs exist. It fails Rawls’ test of justice. Behind the veil of ignorance, not knowing whether you’d be born a wage earner, a saver, or a bank shareholder, no one would choose a system where new money systematically transfers purchasing power upward through the Cantillon effect. Rawls’ difference principle says inequalities are only just if they benefit the least advantaged; bank money creation does the opposite. Most people miss this because schools still teach the “money multiplier” model, which is wrong: banks aren’t intermediaries between savers and borrowers, they are money creators, and the jargon hides how simple that reality actually is.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Your question brings to mind a striking parallel. Why do people refuse to believe in God despite the evidence? Because belief is a choice, not a consequence of the facts. It’s the same with money, but in reverse: the evidence is there, and yet they choose to believe it. Money creation by banks is living proof of this…
Zitteraal1982's avatar
Zitteraal1982 1 month ago
Most people think banks lend out existing money. They don’t. When commercial banks issue loans, they create new digital money through accounting entries. New debt = new money. That money is “real” because society accepts it for payments, salaries, and taxes. Critics call the system immoral because: * private banks gain power to create purchasing power * most money enters society as debt * banks earn interest on money they created * losses get socialized through bailouts Most people don’t understand it because schools rarely teach how money is actually created — and the system is intentionally abstract. “Money” today is mostly bank-created credit.
Banks create money by typing two ledger entries. A loan asset and a deposit liability appear at the same instant. Nothing was transferred from a saver. The Bank of England admitted this in 2014. Roughly four fifths of dollars in circulation were spoken into existence this way. It spends like money. By the older test it is not money. Real money is a bearer asset with no counterparty. A deposit is a claim on a thing the bank has already lent out many times over. Mises called it fiduciary media. The plain word is fraud. It is immoral because it violates honest weights. Every dollar created without prior production dilutes the dollars already held by people who did the work. Inflation is theft on a long timeline. The new money routes to those nearest the spigot. Banks, asset holders, federal contractors. Wage earners and savers pay the bill. It funds wars no household would fund by honest tax. It rewards the leveraged and punishes the patient, which inverts every virtue a free people depend on. It breaks inheritance, because a father cannot store thirty years of labor for his children in a unit that is being diluted in real time. Most people miss it because the mechanism offends intuition, the vocabulary hides the substance, the textbooks still teach a model the central banks abandoned, and every institution that could expose it is funded by it. The damage is diffuse, so people blame the grocer, the landlord, the boss. The real cause sits upstream of every symptom. Bitcoin is the first credible exit in a hundred years.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Banks don’t create money they create tokens. Money is the method that we use in our minds to find the value of something, it is not a currency nor a token. What banks do is immoral because it’s usury and theft and it supports the enslaving system that we all live under. Most people don’t see it because agendas have been created in order to normalize this illusion. Fear is used as a tool to keep us all in line with their agendas.
How Banks “Create Money” - Commercial bank lending: When a bank issues a loan, it doesn’t hand out pre-existing deposits. Instead, it creates a deposit out of thin air in your account. That new balance is spendable — it looks and acts like money. - Balance sheet trick: On the bank’s books, your loan is their asset, and your deposit is their liability. No physical cash was printed, yet the money supply expanded. - Not central bank money: What banks create is credit money, not base money (like central bank reserves or cash). It’s accepted because the system is designed to treat deposits as “real” money. ⚖️ Is It Money? - Yes in practice: You can buy groceries, pay rent, or send transfers with it. Society treats it as money. - But fragile: It only works because of trust in the banking system and government guarantees. If confidence breaks, those digits are just promises. 😈 Why Some Call It Immoral - Privilege of creation: Banks enjoy a monopoly on money creation for profit, while ordinary people must work for it. - Debt spiral: Every dollar created this way comes with interest attached. That means society is locked into perpetual debt. - Moral critique: Critics argue it’s parasitic — private institutions extract wealth by issuing promises backed by collective trust, not their own labor. 🤔 Why Most People Don’t Understand - Complexity by design: Textbooks often simplify or mislead, teaching that banks “lend out deposits” instead of creating them. - Invisible process: You never see the ledger entries; you just see “money in your account.” - Cultural conditioning: People grow up thinking money is coins and bills. Few realize most money is just numbers in databases. 🔑 Bitcoin Angle Bitcoiners highlight this because Bitcoin flips the script: - Supply is fixed, rules are transparent. - No privileged institution can conjure new units. - It exposes how arbitrary and debt-driven the fiat system really is.
How do commercial banks create money? Is it even money? Commercial banks create money through fractional-reserve banking. When a bank makes a loan, it doesn't hand over existing cash; it simply credits the borrower's account with a new deposit. This is "book money," or credit. Although it functions as transaction money, it is technically a private liability (a promise to pay) and not base money like physical cash. Why is it immoral? It is considered immoral because it allows private institutions to create purchasing power out of thin air. This devalues ​​the currency through inflation, acting as a hidden tax on savers. Furthermore, it creates a system of debt bondage. Why don't most people understand it? The complexity is intentional. The banking system is shrouded in technical jargon that obscures its reality. As Henry Ford suggested, if people understood how the monetary system works, there would be a revolution before tomorrow. Most people assume that banks are simply intermediaries that lend out what others have saved.
1. How do commercial banks "create money"? Commercial banks create money through a system known as fractional reserve banking. Contrary to popular belief, money doesn't just come from a government printing press; it is born out of the act of lending. The Process: When you deposit $1,000, the bank doesn’t keep all that cash in a vault. Regulations allow them to keep only a small fraction (e.g., 10%) as a reserve and lend out the rest ($900). The Expansion: That $900 eventually ends up in someone else’s bank account. That person's bank then takes 90% of that deposit and lends it out again ($810). The Result: This cycle repeats multiple times, expanding the original money supply far beyond the physical cash in existence. 2. Is it actually money? Technically, what banks create is bank money or "credit," but in the modern economy, it functions as money for all practical purposes. Legal Tender vs. Bank Money: Legal tender consists of the coins and bills (cash) issued by the Central Bank. Bank money is simply a digital entry in a bank's database. Purchasing Power: Because you can use that digital balance to pay taxes, buy goods, or transfer funds, it has the same purchasing power as cash. In fact, in most developed economies, over 90% of the money in circulation is bank money created through debt, not physical cash. 3. Why is it considered "immoral"? This is a profound ethical and economic debate. Those who argue it is immoral usually focus on these points: Creation from Nothing: Critics argue that private entities shouldn't have the privilege of generating "money" through a simple accounting entry, especially while charging interest on something that didn't exist before the loan. Value Dilution (Inflation): By increasing the money supply without a matching increase in the production of goods, the purchasing power of those who save "real money" (stored labor) is reduced. Many see this as a "hidden tax." Systemic Risk: The system assumes not everyone will want their money at the same time. If they do (a bank run), the bank collapses because the money physically isn't there. 4. Why don't most people understand it? There are several reasons why this concept feels counterintuitive: The "Safe" Illusion: Most people are taught that a bank is a "safe" where you leave your money for safekeeping. It’s hard to accept that, legally, when you deposit money, you are actually giving the bank an unsecured loan, and the money is no longer "there." Complex Terminology: Financial jargon (legal reserves, money multipliers, liquid assets) acts as a barrier that keeps the average citizen away from the conversation. Lack of Financial Education: The mechanics of the monetary system are rarely taught in schools. We are taught how to use money, but almost never where it comes from or how its value is originated.
How do commercial banks “create money”? They do not lend existing savings. They create new deposits out of nothing. A 100 deposit lets the bank lend 90 (or more), so total “money” rises to 190 while reserves stay the same. Is it money? No, in reality it is credit—new debt created by the bank. It is subject to different rules like the Law of Reflux and other market checks. However, because we don’t have a true free banking system, these limits are weak, and it ends up functioning as money in daily use. Why is it immoral? Not the act itself in pure free banking. But under today’s privileges—central-bank backstops, deposit insurance, and legal-tender laws—the state lets banks create claims they cannot redeem all at once, while shielding them from failure. Why don't most people understand it? It is invisible—numbers on ledgers, not coins.
kampouse.near's avatar
kampouse.near 1 month ago
When you use your credit card you «  create money » Since in theory could be backed by nothing we trust the end user that they pay it back any credit creation that a back offer you is money **created** same thing with fed and dept just not at same scale View quoted note →
MXLVL's avatar
MXLVL 1 month ago
My answer is : commercial banks and most people are FAKE and GAYYYYYYY
welp, i’ll take a stab at it… when a bank gives you a mortgage, it doesn't pull that from existing deposits. it types a number into your account. liability on their books, spending power in yours. functionally, it is real money but.. philosophically i beg to differ banks earn interest on money they conjured while you spend decades repaying principal that never physically existed. every new dollar also quietly dilutes every existing one. you're not just repaying a loan, you're subsidizing the system that issued it which is immoral.. banks profit from a privilege that the public never granted.. most people don’t understand because financial literacy is conspicuously absent from public education, and that's by design, not an accident.
doggiebtc's avatar
doggiebtc 1 month ago
Most people think banks lend out money that already exists. They don’t. Commercial banks create new money the moment they issue a loan. You sign a mortgage for $300k & the bank types “$300k” into your account the new purchasing power appears instantly. That money did not come from a saver’s vault. It was created as debt. That’s modern fiat banking. Is it really money? Functionally, yes. If society accepts it for: payments, salaries, taxes, goods, then it behaves as money. But it’s temporary money tied to debt expansion. Most “money” in circulation is not cash printed by governments — it’s bank credit created from loans. Why is it immoral? Because: banks gain the privilege to create purchasing power from nothing, while everyone else must work for it, and the cost is hidden through inflation, debt dependency, and asset inflation. New money enters closest to banks, governments, and large corporations first. They spend before prices rise. Regular people receive the money last — after housing, food, and assets already became more expensive. It silently transfers wealth upward. Why don’t most people understand it? Because the system is intentionally abstract: people think banks are warehouses for money, schools rarely teach monetary mechanics, central banking language is deliberately complex, and digital numbers feel disconnected from real value. Most people never ask: “If every loan creates money… where does the interest come from?” That question alone exposes the treadmill. Bitcoin matters because it removes money creation from private banks and political discretion. Fixed supply. No dilution. No insider privilege. Just rules.
Brian's avatar
Brian 1 month ago
They tap some buttons on a computer. If the people you want to trade with will accept it, it's money. It's immoral because 99.999% of people have to work for it while a small group of men can simply print it. This has downstream effects like war, poor health, infertility, etc. most people are overwhelmed with trying to keep their head above water that instead of occupying their time learning, they focus on quick easy pleasures.
You ask for a loan. Banker hits enter and brand new money appears from nothing. It's money. Immoral? Smoothest theft in history. Most don't get it 'cause the con needs you clueless. @Micael Shared 😂 image
Jamie's avatar
Jamie 1 month ago
Let’s see if I get this right. How do commercial banks “create money”? A customer requests a loan from the bank. The process of giving the loan creates the money. Is it money? No, it is a debt obligation. Money is destroyed when borrowers pay back their loans. Why is it inmoral? Money is supposed to be a storage of value to be used in the future. Banks do not create value. They create money from nothing, which comes at the expense of others who hold the money. Plus, the banks are charging interest to the borrower. Why don't most people understand it? They aren’t taught how a bank truly works. Instead, they are influenced to use the system. Propaganda suggests that banks hold deposits in vaults and use them for loans.
Commercial banks don’t create it, but State run banks do. They justify it by making the people happy. If the people are happy, the State creates more.
CptKook's avatar
CptKook 1 month ago
Here’s my synthesis of @Saifedean Ammous from the beginning of my Bitcoin journey lol: Everything in a civilization is downstream of money. Money is one half of every exchange. It’s not some collective hallucination or social construct, it’s a technology with certain characteristics that make it desirable as a money. The best money is a hard money. The polar opposite of soft money, hard money maintains its value over time and space by making itself as scarce as possible. This process becomes self-fulfilling as individuals expect it to best retain value. With a reputation for retaining its purchasing power, individuals forego present satisfaction to save in that money. The more individuals save, the more they value the future.   For millennia, gold’s hardness made it the best money to hold across time. If governments misbehaved, gold would flow out of government coffers and inflict proportional economic damage on their subjects. However, because gold is too expensive to audit and authenticate, too expensive, slow, and dangerous to move, and easy to confiscate as a physical bearer instrument, individuals who own gold often custody it with a third party, making the third party a honeypot for thieves. Since the Romans, governments have nationalized mints and inflated the supply of gold by filling gold with tungsten or instituting centralized gold derivative pools like the London Bullion Market Association. Things went from bad to worse when governments monopolized advances in 20th century telecommunication technology to substitute government-issued paper receipts for gold. The further abstraction of this soft money to wiring IOUs across a global payment network was faster and cheaper than transporting gold. In the fiat system, there are 200 central banks around the world that merely add and subtract digital ledger entries to support the shenanigans of banks, settle international trade, buy government bonds, and back the local currency. Only the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) has the authority to validate the additions and subtractions. The Fed has its origins in measure number 5 of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto. This measure requires centralized control of money to aggress on private property rights. Insecure private property rights result in an uncertain future, conflict, and a deterioration of economic goods and natural resources. Without private property rights, individuals have no other rights. According to Ayn Rand: “the right to life is the source of all rights—and the right to property is their only implementation.” Secure property rights are necessary for peaceful cooperation among individuals. These rights ignite the process of civilization. Individuals start to see the value in working, saving, investing, accumulating and deploying capital, specializing, contributing to the division of labor, boosting productivity, creating better, faster, and cheaper technology, and increasing the standard of living for themselves and society. Barter blooms into sophisticated markets, culminating in the stock market. The stock market opens avenues for individuals to freely own and trade capital. The act of individuals engaging in consensual exchange with a hard money under scarce conditions translates into prices that reflect actual conditions and thus the most effective combination of factors of production. Every individual in an economy must express their preferences in market-driven price discovery to be able to project profits and losses and satisfy desires of consumers or else economic calculation, and in turn civilization, breaks down. Civilization has been breaking down since at least the revolutionary era. When American colonists killed their King, they ended up with many kings fighting over who would rule them. They learned that a King with a multigenerational interest in their rule and a respect for hard money is preferable to a revolving door of jockeying 4-year forever term kings who get while the getting is good and leave us holding the bag. These kings, better known as reactionaries, transferred the locus of government power away from a more accountable state or local level by using a military to bind non-signatories to an all-devouring constitution. Reactionaries exploited their newfound power to spin up the first and second national banks. These banks caused boom and bust cycles culminating in the panics of 1819 and 1837. Later, socialist President Lincoln ran the same playbook usingpromises to siphon off the South’s productivity and emancipate slaves as cover. He encouraged the Legal Tender Act of 1862, which allowed banks to redeem private bank notes for greenbacks instead of hard money like precious metals. Soft money sapped information flows and distorted price signals to reveal the deafening noise of complications underlying anindustrialized economy. The chaos led to runaway credit expansion, rampant price increases, and the gradual nationalization of state banks into the hands of wall street banks. It was only when the U.S. went back on the gold standard in the 1870s that the money supply contracted, innovation and economic output took off to deliver modern marvels such as the lightbulb, automobile, and plane, and prices dropped. There was no such thing as government funding science. Instead, there were entrepreneurs. For example, John D. Rockefeller brought cheap and efficient petroleum-based products to virtually every home and industry in the country. Contrast Elon Musk, who survives on government handouts, child labor, and ecological devastation to build 19th century technology vehicles, launch swarms of spy satellites into orbit, implant mind controlling devices, and restrict free speech on Twitter. Elon Musk and the rest of the counterfeit class use unbacked credit to consume more than they produce. Some of the biggest debtors are central bank shareholders: commercial banks. They work the Fed like a sock puppet to steal money.   Nearly all money in the global economy is issued by commercial banks via loans. The type of loans they issue is constrained only by how much risk the loans will create in the system. They manipulate the amount, duration, and price of loans to bankrupt small businesses and reserve cheap, long-term loans for their friends. The counterfeit class use these loans to steal a disturbingly large amount of the world’s assets, and use these assets to take out more loans to buy more assets, and so on. As they bid up asset prices, every new loan created eats away at the value of dollars over time so they can pay off the older loans with fewer dollars. The productive class disproportionally bears the brunt of this grift since they are limited in their access to credit or save their wealth in a devaluing dollar. The average wage worker lives paycheck to paycheck and, if they’re lucky, is left with the option of investing what’s left in rigged, risky assets alongside the counterfeit class in the hope of covering the rising costs of living. They usually come up empty handed as their investment positions are margin called, stomped out, or rugged by the counterfeit class. This evil scheme will continue so long as the counterfeit class is willing to lend to themselves or until their borrowing triggers price increases sufficient for civil unrest. To keep the game going, the counterfeit class limits price increases by balancing the money they create for themselves with the orchestrated destruction of the money—in the form of loan payments and defaults—belonging to the productive class. Volatility in the money supply creates boom and bust economic cycles. When individuals think they have more money than they really do (boom), they employ means of sustenance to service low priority goods, and these malinvestments cause prices of goods and services crash (bust). There are two standard reactions in the bust phases, and both make future busts worse. First, government stimulus throws soft money at the productive class. The productive class use this money to chase real goods and services and drive prices higher. Second, banks cause economic apartheid by issuing just the right amount of loans tothe counterfeit class to qualify for bailouts without triggering risks that could break the system. They mitigate risks by lending primarily to the counterfeit class, which hold the legal monopolies required to steal enough stuff to pay them back. Both reactions cause a system with too much debt and not enough dollars to service the debt to spin into a death spiral as the market continually reprices the issuer’s credit risk and the issuer is forced to attach ever higher interest on the debt. Afterall the banks have gone bust, the Fed becomes judge, jury, and executioner of a global financial system. Similar to the Soviet Union’s Gosbank, it will centralize all assets in the system into one ledger, giving themselves a central bank digital currency to freely lend and micromanage transactions. Supranational organizations serve to accelerate the death spiral. The IMF and World Bank use the U.S. dollar to sell exploitation as development. Despite the holier than thou hand waving around both agencies, they merely replaced the imperialist sword with inescapable debt. Member states and their proxies stir up crises, install a dictator willing to accept predatory loans and structural adjustments, and extract these evil demands from the masses. The game is repeated to hook billions of people on foreign aid, devalue the local population’s currency, and drop export prices to turn the economy into a monoculture exclusively serving the global north. At home, the difficulty of saving money for the future incentivizes individuals to value the present over the future.Individuals come to realize the futility of saving a failing dollar for future generations, so they spend it. Financial distress forces both parents to work soul crushing jobs or divorce. Without the structure and discipline of a nuclear family for support, young family members wander down harmful paths to find meaning and belonging. These individuals are first tyrannized by a deterministic fiat education system. This system seeks to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority, create conformity, and sort individuals into different classes. Top-down edicts are counterproductive and expensive. The cost to send a student to a crime and drug ridden public school is far more than sending that student to a private school. Public schools churn out individuals like Carl Panzram, whereas private schools keep financial costs down and standards high in response to feedback from competitive market forces. Universities are immune from these market forces as most of the money they receive comes from government research grants or federal loans for student tuition. Universities subscribe to prestigious journals, pressure faculty to submit studies supporting the conclusion that more research is needed, andcollect grant money for more research. Publishers take universities’ work, stick it behind a paywall, charge it back to universities at exorbitant amounts, and universities pass the costs along to students. There’s not a cost to being wrong, there’s only a cost to not publishing and improving the school’s rank. Unfortunately, education is not the only place where ideas live or die according to its ability to generate and secure funding. For example, intellectual property rights give well capitalized and connected right holders access to thegovernment’s monopoly on violence to dictate how others can use their property. The counterfeit class declares ownership over the minds of individuals to establish property rights over an idea. This results not only in a subtle form of slavery but also disastrous economic consequences like endless litigation, stifled innovation, and monopoly prices. Another incoherent patchwork quilt of special interests designed to consolidate economic power in the counterfeit class is energy markets. Economic growth tends to accelerate as energy consumption increases. Cost effective, high power, on-demand, continuous energy sources like natural gas and coal form the foundation of an extended market order of machines automating conditions for every individual to survive and flourish. Thesesources are battle tested to command a nature that’s dynamic, deficient, and dangerous. The proliferation of subsidized, unreliable, dilute intermittent flows of renewable power generation sources like solar and wind are the counterfeit class’s Malthusian plan to depopulate expensive, energy hungry humans behind the pretense of protecting Mother Gaia against climate change. The rollout of renewables is a ploy to impair individuals’ ability to channel energy across time. An additive drag on individuals’ productivity stems from what individuals eat. Most of our food is supplied by large-scale industrial farmers monocropping huge swaths of agricultural land that mechanically, chemically, and physically destroys cover crops and root structures housing innumerable living organisms and feeding many more. A nutrient starved soil requires the continuous introduction of biocides, toxic industrial byproducts like seed oils which release polyunsaturated fatty acids in our bodies that deplete our ability to control oxygen and cause inflammation and chronic diseases like cancer, as well as genetic modifications and other harmful adulterations into our food supply to maximize short-term yields. Farmers get roped into short turnaround times because they must reinvest in the next yield before they drown in continuously rising input costs. However, when farmers used hard money, they had enough financial runway to rotate longer-lived cattle and other ruminants around their natural habitat to graze grasses and shrubs down, till and fertilize the land, and reignite robust carbon, nitrogen, water cycling to reverse desertification, jumpstart a diverse ecosystem, and maximize long-term, healthy livestock and crop yields. Using soft money, individuals are fed a steady diet of subsidized sugar, corn, and soy repackaged into highly addictive, poisonous, and palatable junk. This junk forms the basis of national dietary guidelines, which pervade advice from doctors and dieticians, cafeteria menus in hospitals and schools, and the military. Eating refined sugars build up fat around an individual’s organs, insulin resistance, and elevated levels of insulin which allow cancer cells to metastasize in an oxygen starved environment. A diet of predominantly plants, like corn and soy, over red meat yields humans that are generally shorter, weaker, and more prone to sickness. When more people get sick and stay sick, more dollars pour into insurance, hospital, and pharmaceutical companies. The U.S. healthcare system is a quarter of the economy. Since the 1970s, the ratio of administrators to providers has ballooned roughly 1000x to brace their monopoly. Roughly half of the costs individuals pay go to paying for administrative staff. Providers, pharmaceutical companies, and hospitals spend most of their time maximizing billing and battling insurance companies instead of providing us with quality care. Insurers fight back because what they don’t pay on an individual’s behalf is their profit. In the end, patients are stuck with health andfinancial stressors that feed on one another until they die or file for bankruptcy. The only interest group with more influence than healthcare over the dollar is the Zionist-backed military industrial complex. Henry Kissinger, a Zionist behind U.S. land grabs, said the quiet part out loud: “if you control the money, you control the world.”Since at least the beginning of the 20th century, the socialist Zionist movement spread convoluted Talmud interpretations and Rabbi zealotry to fuel international wars and steal money. As WWI spread, European governments started to sendtheir gold to the U.S. for safekeeping. The Bank of England took this opportunity to circumvent weak domestic demand for war bonds by trading inflatable gold receipts for Treasury issued war bonds. Other European governments followed suit and financedwar expenses with this kind of soft money to keep up with Europe’s raging war machine. In the death throes of WWI, the bill came due for the financially distressed British. Britain appealed to influential Zionists, particularly Lord Rothschild in the Balfour declaration, to dupe the strongest and richest remaining nation-state, theU.S., into joining the war. In exchange, Britain promised to give the Zionists Palestine to fulfill their ethnonationalist aspirations. Britain followed up on their promise in the 1930s by disarming the Palestinians while Chaim Weizmann raised a Zionist military to infiltrate Palestine. Military operations increased the land holdings in Palestine for Zionists from ~5% in 1945 to over ~90% today in the Israeli government’s land authority. For millennia, Muslims, Christians, and Jews peacefully coexisted in Palestine with equal access to property rights under Muslim rule. However, American banking houses, owned and operated primarily by Zionists, controlled industrial juggernauts like GM, GE, Dupont, and Standard Oil, all of whom profited handsomely from a recurring cycle of more conflict, more attention, and more money. These banking houses bankrolled the likes of genocidal narcissists Trotsky and Hitler with the support of the New York banking fraternity. The fraternity included the Roosevelts and J.P Morgan, who touted more government intervention through the New Deal to aid and abet self-serving legal monopolies manifest in the concentrated industries of today. Thus, the fiat system was a temporary measure to finance war at the turn of the 20th century gone awry. It became a permanent fixture when governments realized they couldn’t fulfill their financial obligations. Too many individuals had a vested interest in a system where they could get something for nothing.
BEST ANSWERS: (But there's still something missing I'll be reveling soon) 1) @Contra Banks create money by typing two ledger entries. A loan asset and a deposit liability appear at the same instant. Nothing was transferred from a saver. The Bank of England admitted this in 2014. Roughly four fifths of dollars in circulation were spoken into existence this way. It spends like money. By the older test it is not money. Real money is a bearer asset with no counterparty. A deposit is a claim on a thing the bank has already lent out many times over. Mises called it fiduciary media. The plain word is fraud. It is immoral because it violates honest weights. Every dollar created without prior production dilutes the dollars already held by people who did the work. Inflation is theft on a long timeline. The new money routes to those nearest the spigot. Banks, asset holders, federal contractors. Wage earners and savers pay the bill. It funds wars no household would fund by honest tax. It rewards the leveraged and punishes the patient, which inverts every virtue a free people depend on. It breaks inheritance, because a father cannot store thirty years of labor for his children in a unit that is being diluted in real time. Most people miss it because the mechanism offends intuition, the vocabulary hides the substance, the textbooks still teach a model the central banks abandoned, and every institution that could expose it is funded by it. The damage is diffuse, so people blame the grocer, the landlord, the boss. The real cause sits upstream of every symptom. Bitcoin is the first credible exit in a hundred years.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 2) @Farside Commercial banks trade in fiat currency. It is not money. Fiat currency is debt, backed by nothing but the promise to pay it back. It is literally a "trust me, bro" financial system. Let's call it money for the sake of this conversation... The banks lend money into existence. When you get a mortgage for example, and IOU is created (your mortgage), and a ledger entry is created on the bank asset side to balance the accounts. That's it. And you pay interest on that balance. Which is usury. Which is immoral because having someone pay you interest on something that costs you nothing and which you have no risk exposure is predatory. If the bank requires capital to meet regulatory requirements, it goes and borrows it from the central bank. The central bank types the number into a computer, and the amount is loaned to the commercial bank just like a mortgage, but at a much lower interest rate. Most people don't understand it because it is an inversion of what money actually is, and what people intuitively think it is. They simply can't wrap their heads around examples like if you buy a coffee at Starbucks with your credit card, you are creating money, but if you pay with cash, you destroy it. 3) @Magnetar The bank is legally required to keep only a small fraction of our deposits (the reserve) and can lend out the rest. This creates an expanding supply, also known as the money multiplier. For me, it's not money; it's just credit. It is definitely immoral and dishonest for a bank to tell a depositor that their money is available on demand, while simultaneously lending that same money to someone else. This also creates credit bubbles that eventually burst. People don't understand it because they are financially illiterate by design and trust institutions. View quoted note →
Its through fractional reserve banking. As i understand it, effectivly a bank can lend the same dollar out multiple times by treating the debt of others as an asset that they can then loan out again. Say you have a dollar and you deposit it with the bank. The bank treats your deposited dollar as their asset which it then can lend out multiple times. Each time it does this it counts each loan as a "new" asset(the debt of that loan) effectivly "printing" new dollars into existence. On top of that each dollar they lend is now owed back to them with interest. This *only* works as long as there is enough time in-between deposits and withdrawals for the bank to remain *solvent* on paper. Its only when every depositors wants to withdrawal all their money all at once that the system breaks and a bank run happens.
1. How do commercial banks “create money”? Is it money? Yes, they are money, and literally, they are based of government's debts/loans; the more trustworthy seemed government, the more money central bank can print (without uncontrolled inflation, - while fair market's interest rate is comparable to inflation, and both is considered comfortable) 2. Why is it immoral? They are mostly moral: the small inflation keeps money in circulation, not in a hidden bunkers/treasures; in another words, almost every paper banknote can be used by anyone who claims "I'll pay interest rate, I promise!!"; it makes more money for investment, innovations, wellfare, "obamacare", etc (how many startups are funded by bitcoin? Not many? Because huge bitcoin hodlers prefer to hodl instead of circulation; "zap economics" seems to rising fast, so, we still have our best hopes;) it's not 100% moral because people are enforced eather trust banks, or invest in risky way, or agree with inflation; and neither banks nor governments have 100% ethical right to decide what to do with results/payments of fair work. So, fiat money are, I can say, 90% moral if we have Cute Elven Princess in our government 😜 💜 3. Why don't most people understand it? Most people understand it, but agree with fiat risks. Also, as I mentioned above, inflation-resistant coins are mostly hidden in treasures, not circulating in economics. Also, bitcoin (even custodial LN wallets such as coinos.io) are not very user-friendly in comparison to paper money or friendly support in fair bank (not every bank is fairy! ) Sorry for my bad english... >.<
Sry for being late! ✌️ Most of us grew up thinking banks are just giant piggy banks. You deposit your paycheck, they hold it in a vault, and maybe lend a piece of it to your neighbor for a mortgage. That's a lie. Banks don't lend out existing money. When you go to a bank for a loan, they don’t check the back room to see if they have enough cash. The loan officer literally types numbers into a computer screen. Through double-entry bookkeeping, they simultaneously create an asset on their end (your signed promise to repay them) and a liability (the amount they just credited to your checking account). Boom. New money was just conjured out of thin air. Functionally, yes, is it money! You can buy a house, buy groceries, and pay taxes with it. But fundamentally? No. It’s fiat credit. It’s basically a digital IOU. Nearly 97% of all the "money" in the world today isn't physical cash printed by a government it's just digital debt created by commercial banks. Why imorally; If you or I print money in our basement, it's called counterfeiting and we go to federal prison. When a bank does it, it's called "providing liquidity." The system is entirely unethical for a few reasons: The Cantillon Effect: The people closest to the money printer (banks, massive corporations, the government) get to spend this newly created money first, before prices adjust. By the time that money trickles down to the average 9-to-5 worker, the money supply has expanded and the cost of living has skyrocketed. It mathematically transfers wealth from the working class to the elite. Theft of your time: You trade your scarce time and physical energy for a paycheck. Money is supposed to store that energy. When a bank dilutes the supply with a keystroke, they are quietly stealing the stored energy of your labor. It's a hidden tax. Socialized losses: Banks charge you heavy interest on money they created for free. When the economy is hot, bankers pocket massive bonuses. But when this debt-based house of cards collapses (like in 2008), the taxpayer is forced to bail them out. They keep the profits, you pay for the failures. Why don't most people understand it? Why most people don't understand is... Honestly? Because it sounds like an insane conspiracy theory. There is a massive normalcy bias at play. People assume the system is fair and that the money in their banking app is actually "in the bank." Furthermore, Wall Street and central banks purposely hide this reality behind a wall of incredibly boring, complicated jargon" quantitative easing," "reverse repos," "liquidity coverage ratios." They make it sound so dense that the average person just tunes out, assumes they aren't smart enough to understand it, and trusts the "experts." We are essentially forced to play a global game of Monopoly where the banker can just write new numbers on a piece of paper whenever he wants to buy up the board. This is exactly why Bitcoin was created. You cannot type a Bitcoin into existence. It requires an undeniable sacrifice of real-world energy (POW). You can't cheat the math. ⚡️