Spot on. The 80-byte limit wasn’t an arbitrary technical hurdle; it was a philosophical guardrail. When we remove the cost of bloating the chain, we aren’t 'innovating'—we’re just subsidizing data storage at the expense of future decentralization. Sound money requires sound stewardship. ⚡️

The 'move fast and break things' mentality belongs in Silicon Valley, not Bitcoin. If we lose the ability for the average person to run a node because the chain is a 'data dumpster,' we lose the only thing that makes Bitcoin valuable: censorship resistance. Supporting BIP-110 is just common sense at this point. 🧱🟣

The shift from 'money' to 'data settlement' is the crux of the current friction. If the base layer becomes too bloated for a regular user to run a node, we’ve lost. Do you think there’s a middle ground ; like a modest cap , that could have avoided this fracture, or is any deviation from the 80-byte discouragement a slippery slope?

110 will fail. I’ll happily run my v29 node as I watch it fail

OP_RETURN was deliberately limited (80 bytes, one per tx) as a ENCOURAGEMENT mechanism for throwing SPAM into UTXO address, so they remain FOREVER in UTXO set.

Not sure why people always ignoring that a mempool limit is irrelevant because it’s not a consensus rule

Reads like it came out of an LLM. Wanna wager bip 110 activation being a success/failure?

".. OP_RETURN fue deliberadamente limitado (80 bytes, uno por transacción) como un mecanismo de DESALIENTO para datos no monetarios en la capa base.Nunca estuvo pensado para ser un basurero general de datos.Al eliminar el límite y hacerlo efectivamente ilimitado, Core eliminó ese desaliento sin un consenso amplio. Lo hicieron a pesar de:Fuerte oposición en GitHub (4:1 en contra en las discusiones/PR relacionadas) Advertencias de voces prominentes (Nick Szabo, Giacomo Zucco, Samson Mow, Jimmy Song, Luke Dashjr, etc.) Ningún intento real de construir consenso social primero Esto no fue «seguridad conservadora primero». Fue un giro filosófico imprudente hacia convertir a Bitcoin más en una capa general de asentamiento de datos, a costa de su enfoque como dinero sólido y escaso.Previsiblemente fracturó a la comunidad, disparó masivamente la adopción de Bitcoin Knots, provocó BIP-110 como respuesta y creó la actual guerra civil, todo por lo que muchos consideran cero ganancia significativa.Core podría haber mantenido el límite (o haberlo aumentado modestamente tras discusión), pero lo impusieron con arrogancia, despachando las preocupaciones como mala fe o «fabricación de drama».." View quoted note →

This nicely sums up the growing support for knots and now bip-110. Core has made an aggressive move to increase the value of blockspace at the expense of native token ₿ which derives its value from being perfect money. Blockspace, like cloud storage is proving to be less and less valuable. Wallstreet is clamoring to launch securities on eth and sol but those launches if successful, will do little to boost the value of the chain token, and only boost access to the security. Those chains are inefficient data infrastructure, not money. If the native token continues to be valued by an increasing number of users workdwide, blockspace becomes more competitive on L1. I find it hilarious that many of the small blockers who are gladhanding themselves for being right in the blockspace wars are not claiming that the capped op return/no inscriptions crowd are the dangerous change agents in Bitcoin. If bitcoin continues to move in this direction, you’ll see a bunch of sound money cypher punks join the boomer gold bugs….angry about what could have been before the kids had to go and fuck up what wasnt broken. “Intellectual handwaving”, its and IQ test, you wouldnt understand…..fuck off. My money, my node, the ruleset I choose, and if enough people agree tbe longest chain wins.

Let fork yourself away.

Community warning: a shitfork liar who pushes others onto the fork but refuses to swap sats to get more on its side, hence himself deeming it less valuable

Not the longest chain, the chain with the most proof of work! There is a difference.

Not v30+ Just going to stay on v30 forever?

Probably.