Exercise your right of freedom of association and take care of your reputation by not associating with shitforkers who attack bitcoin. The social layer protects it too 🛡️

Shitforkers shall be shunned

Those who don’t respect the consensus and push a contentious change using dirty tactics such as lawfare or empty‑word propaganda (words not backed by sats) don’t deserve respect

The social layer defends 21M from shitforks #Poznań #Polska

Zapraszam w najbliższą niedzielę na spacer społeczności entuzjastów bitcoina: 11:00 zadaszony stojak rowerowy na skraju Ewangelickiej przy Skwerze Jana Suwarta

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

#Poznań #Poznan

There’s no such a thing as attacking bitcoin at no cost. The social layer protects it too! The shitfork liars should not be surprised when honest bitcoiners, who care about their reputation, don’t want to be associated with them in any way. BIP-110 proponents are worse than Roger Ver. He also didn’t understand decentralisation, but at least he put his capital behind the fork, so he didn’t consider it a shitfork. Additionally he exited cleanly with a hard fork, not trying to mount a 51% attack to push through a contentious soft fork. RDTS promoters more closely resemble CSW by not being backed by their own capital and resorting to babbling, bluffing, lying and lawfare. View quoted note →

For over 2 months, I’ve been challenging shitfork promoters in my native‑language 21 group to enter a futures contract. There are actually a few of them in that group as @Tomek ⚡ K allows the group to be used as a platform for promoting the shitfork. I can report that all of the promoters turned out to be full of shit liars who knowingly push others towards a cliff (explicitly promoting a shitfork, a fork they don’t believe will succeed). There’s no genuine support backed by sats in the Polish 21 community. There have been only folks who have expressed interest in taking the same side of the contract, defending 21M against the contentious fork. My offer remains open and like @Rob Hamilton I’ll give 10% of my potential winnings from the contract if you refer a BIP-110 proponent into actually making the bet with me but I’m happy to take smaller bets than Rob does. So whenever you see someone promoting that shitfork, link them to this post so we can both make some bitcoin! View quoted note →