The CIA making Bitcoin narrative that Tucker sparked isn't even worth talking about.
Once you understand what Bitcoin is, you understand it doesn't matter who created it.
Login to reply
Replies (13)
Thank you CIA
i've never said the cia created bitcoin, but i *have* said that it wouldn't matter
i've also said that the nsa must know who satoshi is, and this bothers people. has everyone forgotten about snowden already? sorry 🤷🏻♂️
Some people think there’s some backdoor to Bitcoin that will allow the CIA to control it once it reaches a certain value. But I feel like one of the many devs certainly would have figured this out by now..
Tucker *is* CIA.
nostr:nevent1qqst9h4lsrvfs8935yty74kanhrdulyql2fqlr0rrhtd3pl2xx87meczyqgrv5tkdduvex54e9pcu9wja723lr9d8xr2amh68n6q6p0utzqguqcyqqqqqqg63f4z3
Technology by itself is not enough for freedom.
If the NSA was omniscient, they wouldn't need to spy on everyone. If they spy on everyone, then there must be some people they can't get intel on.
There is absolutely no indication that Satoshi worked for a government. All arguments I've seen are basically, "I don't know, therefore this," which is retarded.
huh? an unknown, unprecedented dragnet exists. to avoid it you would need to be nearly irrationally paranoid. as a random person, are you in the net, or not in the net? lay low long enough and you'll probably fall out of retention. but what if you became suddenly interesting?
not sure how you would conclude satoshi worked for a government though, other than to make a strawman you call retarded
Well, now I know you're retarded. Goodbye and good riddance.
never said hello
Bitcoin reached its value jan 3rd 2009. USD hasn’t caught up yet.
For sure
Pythagoras could have been a low life scumbag human and yet A squared + B squared still equals C squared. I’m using the theorem because it works and is useful…..
nostr:nevent1qqst9h4lsrvfs8935yty74kanhrdulyql2fqlr0rrhtd3pl2xx87mecwwurvv