Just received a call from Apple, I have to remove zaps from posts in the next version
Login to reply
Replies (81)
Apple ain't the platform
Ha the next one ☝️
so gay
@apple 
Did you send them a link to ZapplePay?
@Openvibe next?
It was anticipated that it would happen, but the feeling is still very disheartening.
#fuckapple
The gatekeeping legacy systems...
View quoted note →
果然是還不夠肥🙊
hey, congrats on this, seriously
Tell them it’s fine, we’ve got ZapplePay
ecash实现zap的话基本是礼品卡兑换的原理，而不是引入支付系统，可能通过Apple审核会容易些。
View quoted note →
Don’t care. Still zapping.
The gaze of Sauron is upon you.
Nostur 👀
View quoted note →
All good as long as custom emoji reactions work.
Dump Apple Pay and use ZapplePay
View quoted note →
Sorry man. Apple does whatever they want… like a damn honey badger
Slowly moving away from Apple.
View quoted note →
One day yall will stop wasting ya time on apple bullshit...
Let Apple control idiots money.
Not yours....
🙄
View quoted note →
Bummer, but it was inevitable.
I’m not a lawyer. I wonder if Apple considering these Zaps as payments (money) is in conflict with the fact that the US does not recognize Bitcoin as money.
Does not surprise me 🫤
⚡️
This is brilliant
Is there not a way to make zap workflows outside of the apps as a user-defined workflow? Just like nsecBunker is an inbound workflow for a client, we could have outbound workflows. It could be called anything. A user could kick a workflow, outside of the app, by clicking a button on a note, if he wants that workflow to zap the author then fine, but it could be something else such as tag it in a community (nostr.kiwi). After all, nostr’s strength is interoperability ☺️. No?
Stop making shit for Apple
See @Zapple Pay and View quoted note →
They got good hardware and really missing their user base would hurt nostr adoption no?
Did they provide an explanation for the reason? Is it because they can’t tax it or due to other concerns?
Throwing out apple products like
Maybe short term, but you can't fight a walled-garden system. They won't adjust their rules for us, so we shouldn't be limiting freedom tech capabilities to please a giant closed-source ecosystem
I just zapped you from my Iris.to web client on my Safari browser and there’s nothing Apple can do about it.
🤣 🤣 🤣 Fuck Apple.
At least you iOS folks now have Zapple Pay as a workaround.
View quoted note →
Kinda like this zapplepay.com ?
Hope that Google is not looking 😅
View quoted note →
🥲
I’m zapping you from iOS now ;)
Oy vey I could feel Tom Apple seethe while I did it.
😂
Exactly
They'll change their mind within a year.
Otherwise, forgoing Bitcoin adoption and choosing to rely on legacy system monies will be their undoing.
Adopt or die scenario.
Add Zapplepay.
Fuck ‘em!
Jerks. Was only a matter of time based on the past few weeks unfortunately.
But Why? 😡
Next phone won’t be Apple I’ll tell you that much
stop using apple products. they have nothing but contempt for their own customers.
What 😳
How about...
Don't make an update.
🤣
View quoted note →
For which product?
Apple insists on getting a cut (usually 30%) of all payments that use its platform
Lightning isn't Apple's platform.
Yeah, I'm certainly not defending them. They are exploiting their monopolist chokepoint to exclude any payment platform other than the one they can control and take 30%
I was hoping the new DMA law in Europe would force them to allow alternate in-app payment, but it seems they still might insist on getting a cut, and probably wanting it in standard currencies, not in any blockchain currency
Mobile Dev Memo by Eric Seufert
The DMA and alternative in-app payments: too early to celebrate | Mobile Dev Memo by Eric Seufert
The DMA and alternative in-app payments: too early to celebrate. Mobile marketing and advertising, freemium monetization strategy, and marketing sc...
bruh
早期比特币钱包上架常碰到类似问题，再发展大些就好了。
Bitcoin is inevitable, so is Nostr.
"在种子中，未来的森林已经存在。"
感觉我也快了 😅
类似的事情微信闹过一遭，后来互相妥协了，nostr可以参考。
微信重开公众号打赏，和苹果扯皮一年多终于有结果了
图片来源：视觉中国6月6日，微信官方公众号发文宣布，重新开放公众号打赏功能，而功能的名字也变成了“喜...
“2017年9月，苹果更新了App Store条例中的3.2.1第七条，即关于应用内用户相互打赏的内容，更新后的条例显示，个人用户可以在不通过应用内购买的形式来向其他用户赠予礼物，但应用开发者不能从中抽成。”
微信是什么体量，诺斯特是什么体量，不可同日而语。而且诺斯特和微信还有个最大的不同，诺斯特是协议，是网络，在 web2 世界里并不存在实际主体，如腾讯公司
苹果公司如果自己当真也遵守这条规则，就不可能有现在这一出出的威胁下架戏码
适用这条的争议应该在于nostr行为是per key而不是per user，pubkey和个人不等同，这本是nostr特殊的地方，其他应用用户可以等价到个人。
nostr fund可以雇佣专业的商务谈判去处理这件事情。
zap绝对符合：
3.2.1 Acceptable
(vii) Apps may enable individual users to give a monetary gift to another individual without using in-app purchase, provided that (a) the gift is a completely optional choice by the giver, and (b) 100% of the funds go to the receiver of the gift. However, a gift that is connected to or associated at any point in time with receiving digital content or services must use in-app purchase.
Sadly, it's the danger of building a business on top of the business of someone else... they own you. Still, I hope Apple will finish to understand the potential of Bitcoin for them too.
Then you don't update. xD
I guess it was a matter of time.
This is an achievement actually.
Congrats king 👑
Bummer. I suppose that's eventually coming for all the zap-enabled apps. Still, frustrating.
So are bitcoiners gonna ditch apple yet or keep using permissioned services?
🤷🏻♂️
Fuc# em!
Fam, this is genius! Had no idea this was a thing.
🤨
Fair point. (Not a lawyer either)
You built this!? 😮
This is so cool! Thanks for sharing, man 🫂 Gonna make a PWA of this for the future
Is that because apple doesn't have a wallet to take their 30%? 🤔😁