Replies (59)

Kendy's avatar
Kendy 2 years ago
Are you being serious? I imagine an AI image/video content screening service is extremely expensive or tough to code
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 2 years ago
You think a child should expect flawless content safety from clients less than a year old dev’d by underpaid and understaffed teams accessing a relatively-brand-new immutable protocol? Will is not responsible for parenting children. There is zero implication of expected child safety here.
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 2 years ago
That looks like it requires the note authors to opt-in to that tag? Correct me if I’m wrong pls
Diego Valley's avatar
Diego Valley 2 years ago
There is an option in settings to not show images automatically. I think it works for videos and for people you don’t follow
It doesn’t solve it, as I still have no idea what’s behind the blur and would be playing coinflip pretty much
damus is also 17+ and has blurred images/videos by default. I don’t know how people expect that a browser will be able to police the internet. Maybe when AI is good enough to detect “woman fucking a dog” in realtime on-device.
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 2 years ago
It’s effectively useless for these contexts while you have to trust the note author to opt-in. Maybe the exception would be good-faith adult content creators. Better than nothing I guess
No it was my idea, damus web implemented it first. This nip author just codified it. It just doesn’t solve the problem of always screening “bad” content from users.
Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
Why not just creat AI "dog videos" with appropriate disclosure and stick behind a paywall? Just a #bimbos idea
Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
You're misinterpreting laws
Kendy's avatar
Kendy 2 years ago
Lmao. I heard those relays track their IP addresses and send them juice boxes and crackers
Aside from jokes, it's the easiest for Relay to ban encrypted messages, analyze the content of texts, screenshots and videos with AI. Kids-friendly Relay is not a fantasy, it's a question of price.