I've just witnessed an https connection successfully established via nostr. if you know, you know what this would mean ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ

Replies (51)

Wow this is really really cool
calle's avatar calle
I've just witnessed an https connection successfully established via nostr. if you know, you know what this would mean ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ
View quoted note →
๐Ÿ‘๏ธโšก๐Ÿ‘๏ธ I think there's some confusion. Nostr is already establishes connections with HTTPS every time you use a relay. Are you saying you used Nostr as a transport layer for HTTPS? Interesting concept! Can you share more details on how and why this was done?
yes, that's what I meant. I'm not the dev of this btw, my skills aren't sufficient for this kind of black magic. the tool consists of two pieces of software, and entry node and an exit node. the entry node runs locally or can be hosted by many third parties. the entry node offers a socks proxy over which TLS is established with the web service. the exit node is run by the web service. it all works similar to Tor. you'll be able to visit Google via nostr. you'll be able to connect to cashu mints. the traffic will be encrypted which means the entry and exit nodes won't be able to see it. it's going to be so sick.
a1denvalu3's avatar
a1denvalu3 1 year ago
Sorry but how is this different from Tor? Relay operators will become like Tor nodes operators and the increased traffic will clog up the network just like it's clogging up Tor. Then who would want to run a relay for free? Only three letter agencies -- like on Tor. I think nostr should stick to its original purpose.
Not a techie and I don't know what any of this means either but I feel a tickle down below too. But ISPs provide the physical infrastructure for the servers and clients to connect, so regardless of the protocol, I don't think there's a way around them. You can do as much magic as you want with your software -- it still needs to be transported. Plus (this may be outdate because I learnt it like 20 years ago), there are several layers of ISPs. The local one you're buying access from buys it from a regional one maintaining your state/national network, who in turn buys international connectivity from the Backbone ISPs who lay and keep the submarine cables connecting continents and countries.
DZC's avatar
DZC 1 year ago
npub replacing DNS + CA!! ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿคฏ
Seems like unlike Tor, Relays are easy to monetize. Not running them for free = the feature.
Kush's avatar
Kush 1 year ago
Iโ€™m with you and waiting to hear someone say yay or nay
ClearMined's avatar
ClearMined 1 year ago
It sounds like NOSTR can be used as a transport protocol. ISPs that provide physical infra and IP routing can't be replaced by this.
SweedWick 's avatar
SweedWick 1 year ago
โ€ฆWe get to stay in Wonderland and see how deep the rabbit hole goes!
Saw some posts saying the project looked dead because it hadnโ€™t been updated in awhile. Glad to know itโ€™s not dead
โ†‘