In August 2025, Google announced that starting next year, it will no longer be possible to develop apps for the Android platform without first registering centrally with Google. This registration will involve: - Paying a fee to Google - Agreeing to Googleโ€™s Terms and Conditions - Providing government identification - Uploading evidence of an appโ€™s private signing key - Listing all current and future application identifiers

Replies (39)

Don't beg them. Fuck them. Build the alternatives.
Zapstore's avatar Zapstore
In August 2025, Google announced that starting next year, it will no longer be possible to develop apps for the Android platform without first registering centrally with Google. This registration will involve: - Paying a fee to Google - Agreeing to Googleโ€™s Terms and Conditions - Providing government identification - Uploading evidence of an appโ€™s private signing key - Listing all current and future application identifiers
View quoted note →
we need more devices with graphene >_< they can't make people sign these things for buying a pixel tho, so there's still a hole in this thing. they really can't ever completely close up custom rom dev because AOSP devs build many parts they depend on. i just wish there was an alternative to buying from the pigs themselves instead, i should be able to run it at least on samsung, motorola maybe. nope.
yes there, only they are not as well known as iPhones or Androids and those who make them do not make them en masse because the number of people who buy them is still a niche, but if you go to their official sites maybe you will be able to reserve one
Hello I'm helping 10 people to invest in stock by turning your $160 to get $6,200 in 2 hours do not be curious to DM me and type "want to know how"? Do not miss this opportunity inbox me, for more information TEXT SMS: text WhatsApp:+1 (873) 300-3966 WhatsApp link below ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡
Hello I'm helping 10 people to invest in stock by turning your $160 to get $6,200 in 2 hours do not be curious to DM me and type "want to know how"? Do not miss this opportunity inbox me, for more information TEXT SMS: text WhatsApp:+1 (873) 300-3966 WhatsApp link below ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡
Hello I'm helping 10 people to invest in stock by turning your $160 to get $6,200 in 2 hours do not be curious to DM me and type "want to know how"? Do not miss this opportunity inbox me, for more information TEXT SMS: text WhatsApp:+1 (873) 300-3966 WhatsApp link below ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡
Hello I'm helping 10 people to invest in stock by turning your $160 to get $6,200 in 2 hours do not be curious to DM me and type "want to know how"? Do not miss this opportunity inbox me, for more information TEXT SMS: text WhatsApp:+1 (873) 300-3966 WhatsApp link below ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡
Hello I'm helping 10 people to invest in stock by turning your $160 to get $6,200 in 2 hours do not be curious to DM me and type "want to know how"? Do not miss this opportunity inbox me, for more information TEXT SMS: text WhatsApp:+1 (873) 300-3966 WhatsApp link below ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ‘‡
Tony Acid 's avatar
Tony Acid 3 months ago
my plan to tackle this is to have two phones: 1) regular android phone only with the apps that require Google Play Store (banking apps, Gmaps etc.) 2) degoogled phone (either graphene or LineageOS without Play Store), with zap store and other APKs that are not currently on Play Store
Does it mean that devs can't publish their apps on googles app store without registration? But will devs still be able to publish their apps on alternative stores like zap store? Or is it more complex?
REDACTED's avatar
REDACTED 3 months ago
Yeahโ€ฆ thatโ€™s not not happening on REDACTEDโ€™s watch ๐Ÿ˜ˆ
Most people will feel that it's too hard / expensive. Privacy awareness is not binary. It's a spectrum. Some people see privacy as super important and will go to great lengths to keep it. Some don't care about it at all and will not suffer any inconvenience for the sake of privacy. Most people are somewhere in the middle. Which means the easier it is to gain privacy, the more people will have it. A better solution will be a VM inside graphenos tor android apps. If it's easy to set up, people will go for it.
Will it then still be possible to use grapheneOS on pixel phones. Suck for devs for sure that they will lose reach when they don't want to register in Google
mister_monster's avatar
mister_monster 3 months ago
This is really bad, like "android is cooked" bad. I think it's time we forked from upstream.
Will we be able to use those Google play apk's on GrapheneOS? I think so, because of backward compatibility. But with the Google play Integrity API, the writing is on the wall that their ultimate goal is to keep the apps for Google-authorised builds of Android only. Fuck em, they can keep their spyware apps
Why two phones? You can do all that with Graphene (minus apps that specifically use the Play Integrity API) in separate/private profiles
this honestly seems more monopolistic. how has the eu and us governments not shut this down yet. this is stopping private sideloading, and the eu forced apple to allow sideloading.
You can totally use Google Play Services on a different profile on the same GrapheneOS device. Banking apps no idea, people still use banks? ๐Ÿ˜‰ why not use a computer or web version for that?
poolrooms's avatar
poolrooms 3 months ago
My bank (and presumably others) requires their app with location services enabled in order to use Zelle, which is the least shitty way I've found to send fiat to people. ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ
โ†‘