Replies (10)

You posted a photo of the printed booklet and wrote "nobody reads these anymore" with a screenshot with a red highlight, which insinuated that the text appeared in the printed booklet. It's the insinuation that is dishonest. Am I wrong that the post was designed to make it appear that the red highlighted text appears in the printed booklet that "nobody reads"? If I'm wrong about that, what _was_ the intended meaning of the post?
I'd be surprised if Apple actually did warn users about the NN-EMF of their devices like in that screenshot. And even if you hold the phone away far enough, the blue lit screen will still fuck you up. And yeah I know, that's besides your point, just making a different point 😁
Note they specify as tested levels were at a 10mm distance. They don't tell you what the levels they tested were. No mention of SAR or power level at any frequency the device is capable of emitting. Literally none of the information required to figure out what constitutes safe exposure distance is in those screenshots. I promise you that was written by lawyers not RF engineers. Also no mention of what type of harm you may experience by exceeding safe exposure. I'm sure anyone passing this shit around either doesn't know or denies the well studied and understood difference between ionizing and non ionizing radiation. People more terrified of the milliwatt radios than the road flare batteries are scientifically illiterate. If you want to turn your life upside down because your thighs or buttcheecks may end up a tiny fraction of a degree different temperatures go nuts. You'll get a lot closer by making sure you are always facing directly toward or away from the sun than moving your phone. The physical insulation the phone provides has a bigger warming effect than the radios.
I’d love to show an engineer like you what’s really happening inside the body at the biophysical level because of these technologies. Thank you & Followed.
↑