SimpleX Chat's avatar
SimpleX Chat simplex@primal.net 1 month ago
We plan to adopt zkEVM networks for problems that require network-wide consensus: - public names - server registry - server infrastructure payments using Community Vouchers represented by SMPX utility tokens on some L2 network TBC Please read the plan and FAQ here:
SimpleX Community Vouchers
 You can get a free NFT on Ethereum mainnet that will provide access to testnet when launched - planned for 2026. image

Replies (31)

Default avatar
npub1ah3a...l76e 1 month ago
We need you here to have the conversation, Evgeny. You need to clarify things. I feel you've chosen the wrong model (state blicenved company model) that will make it hard to deliver something long-term without completely alienating your user base before reaching exit velocity.
1 replies ↓
Default avatar
npub1ah3a...l76e 1 month ago
Why not wait to do this on DarkFi? Why not encourage more server operators. No one really expects you yo provide the backbone. All we want is dev work.
𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 08's avatar
𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 08 componente08@nostrcheck.me 1 month ago
- Nomes públicos são formas de ID - Registro de servidores são uma forma de acabar com a anonimidade dos mantenedores de servidores. - O pagamento por usar servidores não poderia ser independente? Porque não utilizam a idéia do protocolo #nostr ao invés dessa idéia? No Nostr qualquer um pode criar seu próprio relay, e quanto a mantê-los, nossas doações são as que os mantem ativos. Se dinheiro é que precisam, apoio a idéia de um SimpleX Chat pago. Planos por meio de pagamentos em Bitcoin e Monero seria a melhor solução. Etherium não é dinheiro, e usar a sua tecnologia é patrociná-los.
1 replies ↓
SimpleX Chat's avatar
SimpleX Chat simplex@primal.net 1 month ago
Always happy to chat. Ethereum support for smart contracts and native support for zero-knowledge proofs being rolled out this year makes it the best choice to develop solutions that require network-wide consensus - there is no alternative. It's not a cryptocurrency choice as some people think. This choice is purely technical, and not political or ideological - it's simply tech that at the moment works better than alternatives and is the most stable. I commented some points on X, will repost here.
1 replies ↓
Keychat's avatar
Keychat 1 month ago
The first two are pseudo‑problems. The third one is a real problem, but the proposed solution is unreasonable.
1 replies ↓
goatmeal's avatar
goatmeal goatmeal@apathy.tv 1 month ago
you are speaking into an echo chamber full of people who are delusional about the state of smart contract platforms. there are a lot of people in here who will get mad and try to smear you as a bad actor because you wouldn't build on an unfinished bitcoin toy. do not listen to the ankle biters who pretend to be alienated.
Default avatar
21M4TW 1 month ago
@Guy Swann You should have a chat with these guys and the recent guests you have discussed decentralized directories with, to see if there is a better solution...
bud's avatar
bud 1 month ago
Please not you image
Brisket's avatar
Brisket brisket@nostrplebs.com 1 month ago
This is so disappointing. I would have preferred to pay for server access. I would have preferred to run my own server. Whatever reason you have for adopting a shitcoin, you're mistaken. This will be the end of Simplex unfortunately. So sad.
Z2theach's avatar
Z2theach 1 month ago
Talk about one shotting all users.
Default avatar
npub1qt2h...p2gt 1 month ago
Deceptive Claim: “We're developing Community Vouchers as a way to enable secure payments to server operator. ” Reality: “the funds shared between server operators and SimpleX network, with operators receiving up to 60%. ”
↑