Login to reply
Replies (78)
Glad you're back. Now is time to support back bip 110?
Working on it.
bro the mempool is completely empty
You think it will stay that way forever?
The sense of urgency, as you see, is not unfounded.
Hopefully not
Bro the Bitcoin mempool and blockchain is for monetary transactions.
Spam currently takes more than 36% of the blockchain space and brings less than 1% of revenue for the miners.
It devalues Bitcoin, its a waste, it makes running a node harder and it hinders decentralization.
There are memcoins for spam and jpegs. Bitcoin is Freedom Money.
Issue #3 - Three Years of Spam
From zero to 36%: a timeline
Lets treat it like a problem until it becomes one
Bitcoin's blockchain ( a decentralized inefficient database) takes advantage of "the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle."
The blocksize limit is what prevents the chain from being to cumbersome to do the IBD.
This was always Bitcoin. The problem is your brain never had the power to grasp what this is. You needed someone to tell you what Bitcoin is.
Bitcoin isn't for everyone.
Spam excusers are funny these days 🤡
Go back to reed the white paper, iletrate.
*read
Are you a Craig Wright dick sucker? He kept pointing at the whitepaper.
Satoshi described bitcoin way more on the mailing thread/bitcoin talk then he ever did with the whitepaper.
But never the less... #FiltersUp #BIP110
Is an anti ai bot defense.
Keep digging that hole buddy you're doing great.
Are you a brainless spam excuser cock sucker?
Even on the Bitcoin forum, Satoshi told you that large data is unacceptable. The whitepaper is Bitcoin's birth certificate. Bitcoin is Freedom Money.
Smells like panic.
... thats what the blocksize limit is for. Its impossible to fight spam in a decentralized system. Satoshi knew that. Now go buy some fucking bitcoin ffs.
It has been a problem since the inscriptions bug
You are completely wrong. BIP 110 🤙
Bitcoin mempool and blockchain is for monetary transactions.
Spam currently takes more than 36% of the blockchain space and brings less than 1% of revenue for the miners.
It devalues Bitcoin, its a waste, it makes running a node harder and it hinders decentralization.
There are memcoins for spam and jpegs. Bitcoin is Freedom Money.
Issue #3 - Three Years of Spam
From zero to 36%: a timeline
Im not wrong. But yes. #FiltersUp #BIP110
Then we agree on #FiltersUp #BIP110.
(I thought you were sarcastic at first about the mempool filters and BIP 110)
Love it
Did you crawl out of the trash again Aaron?
Empty is not.
Memecoins on btc chain should not exist.
Go back to Solana shitcoiners
View quoted note →
That image is pure digital gold, ‘Bitcoin’.
Meanwhile fees are at an all time low and blocks are empty.
Can I posit something to you I've been thinking of?
What if "spam" was able to fit in smaller blocks? Today spam requires a greater amount of blockspace but tomorrow it may not. Does the rationale change? Do we advocate for smaller block sizes? This is where I struggle. If an ordinal is going to pay an exorbitant amount to get into a block... Isn't that representative of a free market? Isn't that what bitcoin is about?
Please school me!
Only mistake I see is that there wasn’t a door in the first place
😂😂😂
I still don't know when he is sarcastic or if at all.
The mempool is nearly empty and fees are at all time low!
@hodlonaut look at all that spam clogging the blockchain 😂
Let free markets be free markets
It’s an emergency!!! Quickly change consensus for this critical but temporary measure!!!
You guys should hear yourselves from a rational point of view sometime.
Fees don't price spam out, spam is getting larger. Look at the data.
Bitcoin mempool and blockchain is for monetary transactions.
Spam currently takes more than 36% of the blockchain space and brings less than 1% of revenue for the miners.
It devalues Bitcoin, its a waste, it makes running a node harder and it hinders decentralization.
There are memcoins for spam and jpegs. Bitcoin is Freedom Money.
Bitcoin mempool and blockchain is for monetary transactions.
Spam currently takes more than 36% of the blockchain space and brings less than 1% of revenue for the miners.
It devalues Bitcoin, its a waste, it makes running a node harder and it hinders decentralization.
There are memcoins for spam and jpegs. Bitcoin is Freedom Money.
Issue #3 - Three Years of Spam
From zero to 36%: a timeline
LOL we need to show them Lightning network
At these prices I'd like to mine some more spam because fees are way too low.
If anyone can find some additional use for the bitcoin network and is willing to pay for it, please do.
Thank you.
Sorry for the guys losing their lunch money on having to buy a larger ssd to store the blockchain, very very sad indeed!
To me every other transaction is spam too and am happy to mine it in the next block.
Bitcoin is for enemies
Bro you make that stuff look fun with this picture
Spammers said they wanna make Bitcoin fun again, so it checks out. Meanwhile Mises said it best:
Zoom out and find out!
What exactly I’m supposed to find out?
Oh no, the blockchain is growing exactly in the speed every node runner is committed to 😱😱😱
4MB every 10 minutes nothing more
They committed to 4MB of monetary transactions you tool, not to 2.56 MB of monetary and 1.44 MB of dickbutts. Plus nobody said blocks need to be100% full for Bitcoin to work properly.
If blocks are not full and people find a way to use this space you can’t do nothing against it. That’s the point
But some idiots like you will never understand that
People finding ways to abuse the extra space is not the same thing as the network allowing them to do it; or even removing the few obstacles remaining in their way.
But some idiots like you will never understand that.
I don’t like spam but is the best way to stop it really to move to a node being maintained by someone who lost 200 bitcoin in a hack?
Ironic… AI slop graphic
There is already BIP 110 on Core.
Which could cause a chain split from my understanding
also this is if you want to know the truth which I doubt
Issue#10: BIP-110: The Miner's Paradox
Sound money or spam database: Miners must choose what they're mining
Is this an argument or evidence that I should implement something that could permanently impact my future life savings?
You doubt that I want to know the truth? Are you here to shed light on my “ignorance” or act superior?
Observing reality, your communication and actions speak loud enough.
It is whatever you like it to be. Spam on Bitcoin will also impact your life savings because it has 0 value and its used to scam people.
Based on 2 notes? Notes that I didn’t even make a claim in
So spam on Bitcoin is going to ruin Bitcoin and if I don’t implement BIP 110 then I’m going to lose all my sats?
So in a chainsplit which one of four outcomes you will lose all your sats?
You have at least 6 notes in this thread only. But I have seen notes from you before too. And yes thats more than enough.
I’ll answer your question after you answer mine
😂, mine is a rhetoric question, no answer is needed from you
Which notes? I’ve been pretty open to hearing a good reason to switch to knots and/or BIP 110 but the risks don’t seem worth it to me. Does that mean I’m ignorant or don’t want to seek truth? Or does that mean I’m cautious and humble enough to admit that I don’t know what’s going to happen?
Very helpful and productive conversation thanks for confirming that I made the right decision by waiting and doing nothing
Aren't you also concerned that Core V30 shipped with a bug deleting Bitcoiners wallets with all their Bitcoin?
Also, about Knots, it has a number of different contributers and peer reviewers. So your worries are kind of strange ...
Of course that you continue to just find excuses it is no wonder.
I am concerned about that which is why I haven’t updated to V30. But acting off emotion often causes more harm. I don’t have enough information to make an informed decision. It doesn’t help when everyone is just attacking each other.
What do you want from me? Lmao I answered your questions and you don’t like it. That’s not my problem GFY 🤣
typical
typical again
Humility is a virtue. But there’s a logical fallacy hiding in your humility — it’s called Appeal to Ignorance: “I don’t know the outcome, therefore I won’t act.”
Not acting IS a choice. And currently, that choice means endorsing the status quo — a chain filling with junk data while node operators foot the bill.
Read the actual proposal before deciding the risk isn’t worth it.
BIP-110
BIP-110: Temporarily Limit Arbitrary Data in Bitcoin
A one-year consensus soft fork to limit arbitrary data storage in Bitcoin, protecting its purpose as sound, permissionless money.
My choice is to wait until things become more clear. Can you guarantee that I’ll be on the right side of a chain split? Of course not. No one can. I’ll wait and see how things play out. If a fork happens, then I’ll wait for the market to decide what chain is the real one.
🤔😳🫡…this is retarded wisdom imho⭕️
It’s retardedly simple. There’s no reason to gamble your life’s energy on egotistical devs.
Satoshi didn’t say “wait and see.” He said “run a node.” Sovereignty requires a decision. The chain doesn’t wait for you to get comfortable.