"I listened to a podcast yesterday where they were 99% sure they found Satoshi. It was pretty convincing" - My Dad
Login to reply
Replies (27)
Yeah there's a journalist saying it's Adam Back, but his evidence is circumstantial and vibey
Lol Of course it's convincing if you believe they can be 99% sure of their conclusion. The problem is that 99% is no more meaningful than 50% in this context. It doesn't give you an actual answer and someone else could easily be 99% sure it's a different person.
"I listened to a podcast yesterday where they were 99% sure they found Satoshi. It was pretty convincing" - My Dad
This is the kind of content that makes you stop and think.
I need to use this gif format more often.
Boomers man. They cannot let go of the filtered programming. This is why they want to KYC/regulate the internet.
Was that podcast AI by chance?
Why are Boomers falling for BS?
NYT podcast idk which
Mountain-grown, low intervention wine from Paonia, Colorado.
Minimal sulfites. No toxic additives.
6+ bottles ship free.
PeonyLaneWine.com
The reporter basically decided from the start that he thought it was Adam and then set out to prove it. Weak evidence, clearly doesn’t understand Bitcoin or Satoshi.
Did you tell him we are all Satoshi?
i love my Dad, but his generation have done enough damage...
Lol. My step grandma sent me the article and thought I’d “be interested in it”. I politely thanked her and then tried to explain that unless Satoshi’s coins are provably moved by someone, it’s all just speculation and sensationalism. She moved on to the next subject pretty quickly.
“The government says they're going to ban Bitcoin.”
— Boomer
Every friend I didn’t orange pill successfully the past 5 years is hitting me with that link😂
On the advice of Ghost of Satoshi bot.
To Ben's Dad, we are all Satoshi!
I’ve been in bitcoin world for awhile and personally Adam has always been my “if I were to guess”, but I listened to “The Dailys” podcast and they had the journalist on who wrote the article break all his findings down, 99.9% sure he’s cracked it. It was pathetic. He’s like “they have the same interests and talk about them the same way”. My dude, tone and writing styles are not even admissible in court without a forensic link from meta data. He basically presented a fancy version of “I have a feeling”.
So, could Adam be Satoshi? Yes. Is this smoking gun evidence? No.
You won’t believe this but I am satoshi
Because courts have a 100% record of getting things correct
“Who is Satoshi” is one of the only safe angles from which legacy journos feel they can cover Bitcoin.
Too awkward for them to get into the reason for Bitcoin’s existence.
View quoted note →
free palestine
I guess I mean more like the rule book. Not the courts themselves.
I’d be willing to bet an amount that “Satoshi” is a team of people.
The important thing is, they are now.
Pre first block satoshi