Replies (15)

you would have to murder me to get my nodes to run anything other than 21 million nevent1qqs9aka5pterdpcs5s4m09f89zpr2qqg3ytcx58c8sxa2tzelrtv34cpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wc85nnjw
Fools? You call bankers fools? ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป
LiberLion's avatar LiberLion
๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐—œ๐—ป ๐—•๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป: ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—•๐—ง๐—– Do you think I exaggerate? Read on. More and more developers are looking forward to breaking the algorithmic limit of 21 million BITCOIN BTC. There are many explanations for this, triggered by various causes. But I think the main one is the increasing centralization of BTC held by bankers, and the lobbying they do with a lot of money to corrupt and dominate this blockchain. I said it some time ago, there will be another fork in Bitcoin, and the most liquid and powerful one will be the banking one with no limit of issuance. The other fork will be residual and die. BitcoinCash will continue its way competing to the banking BTC. Read this image https://x.com/BTCTN/status/1916787222474285557
View quoted note →
1) Remove the config option letting nodes decide what transactions they can accept. 2) Further increase the blocksize. 3) Change 21m hard cap. BITCOIN IS UNDER A COORDINATED AND WELL-CALCULATED ATTACK! ROLL BACK THE BLOCKSIZE. SAME BYTE, SAME PRICE. nevent1qqs9aka5pterdpcs5s4m09f89zpr2qqg3ytcx58c8sxa2tzelrtv34cpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wc85nnjw
Itโ€™s not a problem. The point is that thereโ€™s never a need to create more Bitcoin. With an infinitely divisible asset, any quantity can be money for any size economy.
โ†‘