Replies (62)

Default avatar
Uhu 2 years ago
Interesting, will follow closely
Finally someone is thinking about the UX! I’m already on board
mykopikid's avatar
mykopikid 2 years ago
Go go go, we need more development on layer 2.
It sounds interesting. Liquidity management is something that the vast majority of people will never do. Any solution that helps to alleviate that pain point is worth exploring.
Gregor's avatar
Gregor 2 years ago
Pretty wild coming from a self professed former big blocker.
I love the name Ark and his reasoning behind selecting that name.πŸŒŠπŸ«‚πŸ’œπŸ§‘ β€œNow back to Ark, I named it Ark because it resonated with Noah’s Ark to save plebs from chainalaysis companies and custodians. Self-custodial Lightning doesn’t work for obvious reasons, and chainalaysis companies significantly threaten user privacy.” When I first saw the name I was immediately reminded of all those Twitter Bitcoin Ark Memes that used to float around. πŸ•ŠοΈβš”οΈπŸ’œβš”οΈπŸ§‘βš”οΈπŸ•ŠοΈ
nobody's avatar
nobody 2 years ago
Still concept, needs a softfork to be implemented I believe. So most likely a few years away...
From the way the article reads there will be one centralized server holding liquidity and processing transactions. Surely that can't be the plan... It's also not clear to me how this server will ensure anonymity to users. Looking forward to learning more about this. I always expected to see competition on L2 and I welcome it πŸ™
Wigger's avatar
Wigger 2 years ago
πŸ‘€ I want to test this out with a few thousand sats
Even if this specific solution doesn't work, I think it's great to see the North Star of "we need and want something like this"
zkCSV provides far better privacy (no mixing, just ZKP) and frees up block space significantly. TXs are 15x smaller than normal, just needs a UASF.
Default avatar
nobody 2 years ago
like if i just handed you a bunch of papers in person? that's off-chain. it allows me to make multi-layer "payments" too. lmfao.
The only downside is the insane capital liquidity requirement for the ASP. I'd guess there will be a huge capital fee per round. Consider this, in Wasabi 2.0 we currently have a remix rate of ~50, meaning that every 1 btc that freshly enters the coinjoin, does on average 50 consecutive rounds. The ASP has to provide liquidity for every round, not just for a fresh input. So, in our example, the ASP needs 50 btc liquidity for that one user even though he only has 1 btc.
Hi Jason - Noah.com is a good looking site. I love the crisp clean design aesthetic - minimalist black & white color scheme with a burst of vibrant Bitcoin orange. I love the name β€œNOAH” too. Very nice.πŸ”³πŸ§‘
There is most certainly room for improvement in regards to Lightning. It should be as easy as Apply Pay. I’m confident we will get there soon.πŸ’³πŸ“²βš‘οΈπŸ§‘πŸ’œ
↑