The journalist Martha Root infiltrated a white supremacy dating site with an LLM, extracted all data, and deleted all accounts and databases live on stage at CCC.
More of this please π©·
Login to reply
Replies (62)
Was Ben Wehrman on there?
I'm sorry, did you say white suprimacist dating site?
The pink terminal is just chefβs kiss π§βπ³
What's a white supremacist dating app?
it's a dating app for people who believe that white people should only reproduce with white people to form a master race based on eugenicism β check first comment in this post
Not all heroes wear capes!
But this one did wear a suit hahaha.
Brilliant!
We will soon find out.
Pretty sure I know who IS on the list tho.
The people running those allegedly deleted pro-White Web sites are the good guys, supporting -- against great odds -- the lives and futures of the indigenous peoples of Europe, the White infants and children whose lives and very existence are under threat every day from the Jewish totalitarian system. "Martha Root" serves this Jewish system, serves evil, and therefore deserves whatever harsh fate she may encounter.
View quoted note →
Now we see where this "journalist" really stands on freedom of speech and ability to publish freely.
Now we see where this "journalist" really stands on freedom of speech and the ability to publish freely.
View quoted note β
@npub1mznw...6mak Imagine being this much of a jew
No, itβs just standard racism against whites π₯±
"Full circle"? What in the goddamned Hell are you raving about, "Leetz"? When did the gentle, cultured lady who runs whitedate.net ever do anything remotely similar to the crime that has just been committed against her?
Do you know what eugenicism is? you might want to look that one up
Big scary words without context donβt mean anything. Cope harder racist.
Yea that guy is also a convicted child rapist and neo-Nazi and people engage with him on here without knowing π¬
WTF? Source?
He literally has a Wikipedia page lmao. Just search his name.
Wow.
Now do blackpeopledating.com
π
No? That's racist? Oh... funny how that only flows one way.
I'm confused - is that supposed to be a good thing?
I don't like racists, but restricting freedom of speech seems much worse to me. Have the CCC hackers started enforcing censorship?
Im white, and my wife is black. We both think its disgusting what the hacker did, and disgusting that people here think its good.
βMore of this please π©·β
Student loans database, anyone?
βMore of this please π©·β
Student loans database, anyone?
View quoted note β
they should use Nostr instead so they can have privacy and censorship resistance.
You are WAY out of line on this one.
Now I understand your comment, βMore of this please π©·,β pinko.
If EVER, βJumped the shark,β was fitting β¦
Like a fart, you canβt take that back.
Hmmm π€ interesting... And also, curious name choice.
The original Martha Root stood for unity through persuasion, not destruction.
None of those website look like WS to me, you are making the assumption that wanting a baby of a certain race is supremacist, if that's true then any white girl that wants a mixed baby, or any Asian who wants their baby to look like them is a supremacist, is ridiculous. I'm black, you should listen how black people talk about having mixed babies (they don't want it). Life is not a history channel documentary, go out more.
one day, YOU will get whats coming to you...
consider it absolute, cunt.
Oh nice!!!!
We already have a most Jewish post of 2026 contender π
Black dating apps: β
Jewish dating apps: β
Arab dating apps: β
Latino dating apps: β
White dating apps: WHITE SUPREMACY π€¬π€¬ only blatant race-mixing promotion apps for you.
(It's designed this way because they want you extinct π)
View quoted note β
No problem with black dating apps, Asian dating apps, faggot dating apps, jewish dating appsβ¦
But if white people want to associate with whites itβs βOMG, racismβ
Youβre one horrid and retard cunt.
Sheβs not racist, sheβs simply anti-white
Can such a thing exist as a white dating app that doesn't encourage supremacy and eugenicism, or is whiteness an exclusionary factor for the entire premise?
How does this extend to other races having race cases dating?
I'm coming at this as someone who isn't a fan of any supremacist ideologies.
I think the same. Why exist dating apps for all races but not for white?
Exactly
Should someone do this to JDate? Or how about blackpeoplemeet? Indiansingles?
Or do you only think this should be done for communities meant for only white people? Why?
I'm betting you won't respond.
βWhite supremacists on a dating site are just white people who want to date other white people bro i swear bro its not like they want to harm anyone bro πππππππβ
Jesus fucking christ you guys. Words have meanings. Do us all a favor and read a fucking book.
Encyclopedia Britannica
White supremacy | Definition, History, Examples, & Facts | Britannica
White supremacy, beliefs and ideas purporting natural superiority of the lighter-skinned, or βwhite,β human races over other racial groups. In ...
"they're really bad people bro, no I don't know of any crimes these people committed but violence against them is justified bro i swear bro, theyre like really bad so its ok"
Absolutely based π«‘
I wish there were more Martha Roots in the Bitcoin and Nostr spaces
I mean, the Bitcoin space doesn't make an effort to exile white supremacists (or Zionists) so I'm not really surprised, sadly. See: Stefan Molyneux, Nick Szabo, Peter Todd, HODL
Not many students of history here, just reactionaries going out of their way to chirp about "anti-white 'racism'" lol. To them, bitcoin is for everyone until black and brown people start using it
Bitcoin doesn't enter into the conversation.
You're shouldnt be violent against groups of people because you don't like what they believe.
that's all.
What if their beliefs incite violence towards people that are deemed inferior? There aren't many choices left besides violence at that point. There's no such thing as 'tolerating the intolerant' without getting eradicated because the intolerant (read: white supremacists) are playing with a different set of rules. Pacifism is a privilege
this isn't complicated.
if people are inciting violence, that's one thing. but if anybody is suggesting that was going on, that's the first I've heard of it.
most cultures think that their own way of doing things and of being a human being is better.
and people usually prefer the company of those who are culturally and ethnically similar to themselves.
this is normal.
simply wanting to associate with people who are ethnically similar to yourself is NOT inherently violent and is NOT "inciting violence."
This is ahistorical because
- not all cultures are chauvinistic towards people outside of their communities
- this tendency of ethnic affiliation when it centers "whiteness" results in ostracization of people deemed to be the outgroup and the erection of caste systems. See: the Transatlantic Slave Trade of America and its ongoing consequences
- the only purpose that race serves is to confiscate resources, period. Outside of being a social construct, race is not real
As they say on these relays, DYOR
Exactly what i was thinking.
This is racebait bullshit.
Muted.
it's ridiculous to assert that ethnic affiliation isn't the default state. spend an afternoon walking around Manhattan, America has more different cultures living in it than anywhere and they *segregate themselves by preference.*
this happens all over the world.
and its absurd to think that ethnic affiliation is only violent when it "centers on whiteness."
"because slavery" lol. everybody throughout history had slaves.
slavery doesn't make *white ethnic affiliation violent because white people did it also.
ethnic affiliation is normal. good or bad, thats how people are.
you can argue that we should try to create some kind of homogeneous identity where ethnicity and culture doesn't matter.
but then shouldn't melanistic people also avoid ethnic affiliation?
that sounds like an unlikely and terribly boring timeline.
Race mixing... for Israel.
1) pretty much every tribe is, some more than others, you pretty much always prefer your own, it's natural and trivially explainable by evolutionary psychology.
2) slavery was pretty much universal + the British empire (white people) were the first to start to put an end to it + more white people were made slaves and sold in Africa than black people were ever sent to America (Barbary slave trade) + it was largely black people selling other black people into slavery to the Americas + slavery today is largely found in African and Middle Eastern countries = you have no idea what you're talking about.
3) that is so retarded I don't know where to begin. dogs have races, horses have races, cats have races, chimps have races, gorillas have races, orangutans have races, guenons have races, wolves have races, bears have races .... .... .... most mammals have races, but according to you, humans don't, even though it takes a retard to not be able to recognize a Northern European from an Asian from a Native American from an African from an Arab from a Kiwi - you're trying to eliminate discrimination by eliminating the category, retarded is just about the only word I can use to describe that sleight of hand
She's retarded.
No Wikipedia page found.
Just link to it my dude. I don't know who this guy is lol but this discussion is saucy and I'm intrigued.
"Believing a certain thing inevitably leads to violence" say the people who believe violence is warranted against someone for believing a thing.
I wonder if they realize the paradox of tolerance applies to them too.
lololol
What sleight of hand? Race as a social construct with zero biological basis is a widely documented phenomenon. Dogs cannot declare themselves as a race nor do they demonstrate any concept thereof. I don't deal in lies and I didn't make the rules, but stay triggered and call history a 'retarded sleight of hand' π lol
ah yes, the mark of the postmodernist, dismissing inconvenient facts with "it's just a social construct bro".
I don't engage with people who lead with bad faith statements. There are plenty of other Nostriches you can ragefarm
I appreciate your reply, especially since you say you have such high standards. Still, what's wrong with ragefarming, or replying to posts that make you angry? Your post made me angry and so I decided that I wanted to engage with it. Isn't that healthy? I don't think it would be right to disengage and stay away from you just because I can't handle the things you say. So in the spirit of growing as people, can't you please try to engage with my question? If bigoted beliefs don't incite violence, does that make them okay to share in your view?
Yes.
A retarded anti-white cunt, she is