Types of nostr users:
Beekeepers
Christian devs
Ray Peat enthusiasts
People who think they're being gangstalked
Stoners with access to watercolours
A bunch of people in Thailand
Login to reply
Replies (60)
That's Thai people in Thailand lol, not the weirdo types. Just fyi lol #siamstr
Homesteaders
You forgot about psychotic Bitcoin maximalists 🤓 ( me )
I was trying to forget about that lol;)
what about fascists lol
Lurkers who occasionally interact
I see a lot of Japanese in global.
ヨロシクね😀
That's only according to bluesky tho lol:)
Forgot:
ham radio tinkerers
🫡
I should check out global again, not looked in ages👀
Gangstalking is real... Check out rdrama.net, they post about gangstalking on there sometimes as people doing it (not people having it done to them)
Are you talking about alogging or are they actually doing IRL physical stalking of targets?
There's a belief that any platform that embraces free speech will eventually be dominated by fascism. It's semi true but not generally for the reasons that people think.
Gangstalking isn't about monitoring, it's about manipulation - character assassination, destruction of mental health, etc. The rdrama talk is about doing it online, but gangstalking also involves physical IRL stuff sometimes.
Yeah, but I consider that the distinction. Alogging is all of those things without physical interaction but gangstalking is both. This all comes from Francis E Dec "CIA gangster police beat me bloody"
That can't be the distinction because it usually can't be distinguished 🤔
You cant distinguish between people posting stuff online and people hiding in your bushes?
I can if multiple people get together in a group and the plan they come up with is to all hide in my bushes.
Yeah that would be gangstalking then because it's no longer entirely online.
Since that's so rare, such a definition would make gangstalking much rarer and a much rarer term ("alogging") would then describe the more common phenomenon. Doesn't make sense
I don't think gangstalking is a well known term unless you're from a certain corner of the Internet.
you mean beard keeper
I was more thinking of the 'you see that red car, red cars means they're following me. The lamppost blinked out twice, that then sending a messave' -type gangstalked.
Yeah the beauty of the modern schizo poster is that there are plenty of people on the internet who will happily make their delusions a reality.
You don't understand, that is part of being gangstalked.
I've been gangstalked "heavily" compared to anyone I've met but still lightly compared to some people, and yesterday a plane flying low over the rural dirt road I live on made me wonder if it was there to poison me or drug me with something in its exhaust.
That is one of the points of gangstalking, to undermine the victim's ability to safely limit speculation about what's happening. That's what happens when the people who have fucking nukes decide they're going to form groups of psychological experts to gaslight people. The victims feel endangered because they are and they have to begin considering all the ways the danger can possibly present itself and nobody cares because some dangers are obscure or seem silly.
And people like you don't understand, and make fun of it.
Irrelevant. I compared how common two terms are, I didn't say either one is very common outside the internet. You're acting like a fed
That's beautiful to you?
It's an utterly insane thing to make fun of - it reflects on society's mental health and delusions, not the victims.
"Haha, this guy who constantly gets fucked with by the people who do shit like put drugs and poisons in plane fuel wonders if they would do that to him, what a delusional basket case!"
Sorry, I was poking fun at it tbh, because it has become a meme a log time ago. Didn't mean to make fun of you specifically or anything.
No worries, you're still one of my favorite people on nostr 🙏
It's a turn of phrase. Please calm down or I will start hiding in your bushes.
shout out to Thailand
I feel seen. 😂
Where am I?
felt identified even tho this is so specific
Beekeeper to-be beer
We're all gonna be beekeepers soon 🤞🤞
Ok I like that!
I would genuinely like to do beekeeping in the future. Can't imagine how I'd be in a scenario where/when I can do that. But it's a nice thought:)
Beer brewers
You dont need a lot for beekeeping man. There is all sorts of fancy gear, but the basic stuff isn't too expensive.
I think you need a bit of space tho:(
I'm not sure you could be a beekeeper in London in a tiny garden. Bet someone's done it tho
Perhaps it might be difficult but not impossible. Hmm
It would be nice if Londoners could have access to a "community apiary" where you have your hive amongst others.
This may exist and I don't know if it. Will look into this at work in a bit lol
Beer brewers on nostr unite!
Multi-accounters looking for sweet sweet zaps is a big cohort
Beekeeper here 😊🐝
*Stoners with to many servers
เงียบหน่อยนะ ผู้หญิง!
pious anarchist cynic that drinks too much checking in
Don't think I haven't considered it, there must be some market for my puns, but I can't even manage to keep one wallet open much less 2.
You coulda been rich, had you just spent less time doing productive things like raising 6 kids, and stacked zaps instead
I can see it now, on my deathbed wishing I just spent more time and effort chasing zaps.
Surely the likes, and even moreso our meaningful interactions, will suffice
It will.
Until I discover that heaven is going to a subscription model. I mean you could self-host but it is going to be 20,000 sats to open a channel and it might get force closed on you at any time.
I just made myself depressed with that thought experiment, thankfully the official line is that heaven is FOSS. The only gotcha is that you can't fork it. That'd be like forking the number 7. It's still the same one. If you change it, then you have something else.
Put in a good word for old yodl, will ya, jic. "He tried, he wanted to believe. Alas, he was too logical for his own good."
I certainly will, but... That is neither how belief nor logic work. I don't fault you, I am a skeptic on the far side of a decision.
Given flawless logic, a conclusion is only as good the axioms it is based on.
Given flawless axioms a conclusion is only as good as the logic leading to it.
I am not claiming better axioms (how would I know?) but I would presume that a difference in belief came from a difference in assumptions not in logical rigor.
Yeah, different assumptions would be the case. Good luck to us both. though we cant both be right, can we? Likely both wrong, to varying degrees though. Not sure where I was going with this...