⚡️🚨 FYI - Facebook once bought a VPN app for $120M and turned it into a surveillance tool that spied on 33M+ users' entire phones for years. This app helped Zuck buy WhatsApp for a whopping $19B and break Snapchat's encryption. The name of this Israeli app was Onavo. It promised to “secure your data” and reduce mobile data usage. When Facebook bought it in 2013, Zuck said the app would help them connect more people to the internet. Facebook even promised to keep Onavo running as a standalone brand. But Onavo operated as a VPN that routed all your phone's internet traffic through Facebook's servers before sending it anywhere else. Facebook could see: • Every app you opened • How long you used it • Which websites you visited • And at what time you used each app What did this mean for Facebook? It meant that Zuck could see exactly which one of Facebook's competitor was growing popular among people. Look how Facebook was tracking these apps (revealed in the court later) By 2016, this data revealed Snapchat was exploding in popularity. But there was one problem: Snapchat's traffic was encrypted, so Facebook couldn't see how people were using it. In an email, Zuck says: It seems important to figure out a way to get reliable analytics about them Facebook's started "Project Ghostbusters" - named after Snapchat's ghost logo. They would use "man-in-the-middle" attacks to break Snapchat's encryption. Within a month, Facebook's engineers built "kits" that could intercept Snapchat's data before it got encrypted. Facebook created custom client & server side code based on Onavo’s VPN proxy app. This code included a client-side “kit” that installed a root certificate on Snapchat users’ mobile devices. Then Facebook’s servers created fake digital certificates to impersonate Snapchat analytics servers to redirect & decrypt secure traffic from those apps to Facebook. Seeing Snapchat's success, Zuckerberg offered to buy it for $3 billion. But when Snap's CEO refused the offer, Facebook launched Snap's most famous feature on Instagram - Stories. But this wasn't just about Snapchat. Facebook used Onavo to systematically monitor Houseparty, YouTube, Amazon, and dozens of other apps. Any rising competitor was identified, analyzed, and neutralized. Apple forced Onavo off the App Store for violating privacy rules. So Facebook rebranded it as "Facebook Research" and started paying teens $20/month to install it on their phones. When Apple found out, they revoked Facebook's certificates, breaking ALL of Facebook's iOS apps. Onavo shows how Big Tech weaponizes our trust. 33 million people installed privacy protection that was actually the most sophisticated corporate surveillance tool ever built. I'm posting all the screenshots as comments. image

Replies (37)

Show this to Meta users. It might settle somewhere in their subconcious level
FLASH's avatar FLASH
⚡️🚨 FYI - Facebook once bought a VPN app for $120M and turned it into a surveillance tool that spied on 33M+ users' entire phones for years. This app helped Zuck buy WhatsApp for a whopping $19B and break Snapchat's encryption. The name of this Israeli app was Onavo. It promised to “secure your data” and reduce mobile data usage. When Facebook bought it in 2013, Zuck said the app would help them connect more people to the internet. Facebook even promised to keep Onavo running as a standalone brand. But Onavo operated as a VPN that routed all your phone's internet traffic through Facebook's servers before sending it anywhere else. Facebook could see: • Every app you opened • How long you used it • Which websites you visited • And at what time you used each app What did this mean for Facebook? It meant that Zuck could see exactly which one of Facebook's competitor was growing popular among people. Look how Facebook was tracking these apps (revealed in the court later) By 2016, this data revealed Snapchat was exploding in popularity. But there was one problem: Snapchat's traffic was encrypted, so Facebook couldn't see how people were using it. In an email, Zuck says: It seems important to figure out a way to get reliable analytics about them Facebook's started "Project Ghostbusters" - named after Snapchat's ghost logo. They would use "man-in-the-middle" attacks to break Snapchat's encryption. Within a month, Facebook's engineers built "kits" that could intercept Snapchat's data before it got encrypted. Facebook created custom client & server side code based on Onavo’s VPN proxy app. This code included a client-side “kit” that installed a root certificate on Snapchat users’ mobile devices. Then Facebook’s servers created fake digital certificates to impersonate Snapchat analytics servers to redirect & decrypt secure traffic from those apps to Facebook. Seeing Snapchat's success, Zuckerberg offered to buy it for $3 billion. But when Snap's CEO refused the offer, Facebook launched Snap's most famous feature on Instagram - Stories. But this wasn't just about Snapchat. Facebook used Onavo to systematically monitor Houseparty, YouTube, Amazon, and dozens of other apps. Any rising competitor was identified, analyzed, and neutralized. Apple forced Onavo off the App Store for violating privacy rules. So Facebook rebranded it as "Facebook Research" and started paying teens $20/month to install it on their phones. When Apple found out, they revoked Facebook's certificates, breaking ALL of Facebook's iOS apps. Onavo shows how Big Tech weaponizes our trust. 33 million people installed privacy protection that was actually the most sophisticated corporate surveillance tool ever built. I'm posting all the screenshots as comments. image
View quoted note →
Legion XXI's avatar
Legion XXI 5 months ago
Disgusting behaviour from Facebook as usual
hasky's avatar
hasky 5 months ago
that is why i said to GROK ...cock suckers !🤣
hasky's avatar
hasky 5 months ago
Grok back up by Musk and his friend also a joke , then the price is outrages expensive for once he claimed as open source .' Musk keep bitching a bout Sam Altman with his Open Ai name and what do you know ??? the price of Grok ..is the most highest of all that can not be open source . the competitions getting tighter and the risk getting higher . they can just give million dollars funds to start up , for the sake of error and all those money just blew up in the air ... crazy...hyped .
Baerson's avatar
Baerson 5 months ago
Elon is way less bad! I'm not niavly suggesting he's some innocent angel, but Mark Zuckerberg (don't call him Zuck, it's like this cool nickname for the worst human alive today). He's clearly evil.
Baerson's avatar
Baerson 5 months ago
Is that the same as people actually knowing but still no caring?
zuck is a psycho. i already knew this but i had no idea the depths he had already plumbed. i quit using facebook because i found out they were deliberately isolating me from the social graph in 2018. but this goes beyond the pale. all meanwhile zuck was helping along with the russia hoax and all, i mean, they are all in it together, and we need to shun them, and warn our friends. unfortunately normies are not gonna pay attention until they get their identity stolen or their bank accounts drained or blocked or suffer a physical attack because of someone using that information hacked out of their insecure systems. some people are gonna suffer a lot, but there's not much you can do except warn them. they have to take the action to learn how to defend themselves. authoritarianism is the disease they need to cure, and they will never reject it while they are infected with it and feel no pain.
JamesWillstone's avatar
JamesWillstone 5 months ago
About 80 percent of what he said is disturbingly true, most of it is backed by a credible source aswell. The only part of the statement that’s just speculative is that Facebook was decrypting DMs on Snapchat.
hasky's avatar
hasky 4 months ago
Never mind , i am Not mad anymore with Ai or Grok . They all the same .
Default avatar
G Force G 3 months ago
I think this was at a time when most android phones come with Facebook preinstalled and you can't remove it, only "disable" it. I wouldn't know because I use graphene now.